It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You continue to spam this board and the 9/11 forum. That is the same cut and paste garbage you have posted more than a dozen times just in the last month. STOP REPEAT POSTING!!!
Just want to thank you for your in-depth reply as a contribution to the topic. Thanx jude11
There are some more things coming out of the archives about WCT7
I am frustrated
"A fireman-Butch Brandies tells other fireman not to go into the building because of creaking noises and a collapsed ceiling in the lobby" This also, was at 9:59
Captain Chris Bolye recalls that there "was a hole 20 stories tall in the building with fire on multiple floors" and "I informed someone(?????) that the building was in danger of collapse"
Frustrating to say the least!
Do you mean you are trying to work out the exact time that WTC-7 was evacuated and who ordered it? sorry just want to be clear on your question.
, besides the terrorists smashing planes into the buildings next door that is.?
reply to post by hgfbob
You continue to spam this board and the 9/11 forum. That is the same cut and paste garbage you have posted more than a dozen times just in the last month.
STOP REPEAT POSTING!!!
I get that someone told you what they believe and you believe it too i get that
but just for arguments sake do you think you can answer his questions or at least give us some actual evidence to rebut his claims
NCSTAR1A p.39/130 "the damage from the debris from WTC 1 had little effect on initiating the collapse of WTC 7."
correct me if i am wrong but buildings like skyscrapers are built to withstand more than just fire or designed to free-fall from a little structural integrity....
For those who haven't yet seen it, here's a link to the voluminous work done by Jeff Prager regarding the evidence (debunk it if you can) of mini-nukes being used to take down the towers. It's worth looking at just for the amazingly zoomable photos that are included which you won't easily have access to anywhere else.
Jeff Prager Nukes - 911
Funny that this information is so demonized and not discussed fairly, while Judy Wood's cockamamie theories are trotted out over and over again.
The truth appears to be that someone nuked NYC and whoever it is will feel free to do it again if they're not brought to justice. Is your city next in line for the 'no one could ever have imagined' false flag scenario?
but just for arguments sake do you think you can answer his questions
or at least give us some actual evidence
to rebut his claims other than a tree branch can fall in mysterious ways because correct me if i am wrong but buildings like skyscrapers are built to withstand more than just fire or designed to free-fall from a little structural integrity...
You see Spooky at myself (i know arrogant) are probably two of the most informed "OSers" who still bother to regularly post on this forum
Case in point. You will claim that WTC-7 was brought down by controlled demolition
because it looked like a controlled demolition, but you cannot provide any actually proof it was a controlled demolition. Then you demand that we prove it was not a controlled demolition effectively asking us to prove a negative as you have no proof of controlled demolition
if you read the full report it becomes clear that a number of factors contributed to the demise of WTC-7 including the massive damage it sustained, in the picture below is just one example.
the NIST report makes this very clear but it does say that it was not that damage
The connections holding floor 13 to column 79 failed
any actual evidence though that there was foul play
"No conclusive evidence was found to indicate that pre-collapse fires were sever enough to have a significant effect on the microstructure that would have resulted in weakening of the steel structure."NIST NCSTAR 1-3C, p. 235
"no evidence the type of joining methods, materials, or welding procedures used was improper"NIST 1-3 p.99
"recovered bolts were stronger than typical".NIST 1-2 p.133
"no core column examined showed temp. above 250C" NIST 1-3 6.6.2
besides the terrorists smashing planes