It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
www.activistpost.com... decision to bring this information to the screens and actually show people the collapse of Building 7 was inspired by a scientific poll that was done by the campaign. The poll found that 51% of Canadians who are shown video footage of the collapse of Building 7 suspect that it was a controlled demolition, compared to 18% who suspect it was caused by fires.(1) When the people were asked who they were more inclined to believe – the U.S. government which still states that the building was brought down by fires, or the critics such as Architects and Engineers For 9/11 Truth who argue that it was a controlled demolition, 49% agree with the critics, while only 20% believe the official story from the government. 44% are in support of reopening the investigation while only 14% are opposed.
Aside from this ad campaign in Toronto the people behind ReThink 9/11 have had several campaigns running all over North America including Vancouver, Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco, New York, Dallas and even London, England.
TheForced
reply to post by jude11
20% of Canadians believe the US governments propaganda??
Come on guys just watch it, and reference its collapse against other building fires and consequential effect.
9/11 was planned, and not by a bloke in a cave.
intrptr
And proof of the controlled demolition is riiiight….
oh, never mind.
Yusomad
intrptr
And proof of the controlled demolition is riiiight….
oh, never mind.
Would not need much more than common sense...
Then you can go to physics and all but that horse is long dry.
Sremmos80
Freakin awesome canada.
I wonder the repercussions, legal or outrage, for doing something like that here in the states would be...
Aside from this ad campaign in Toronto the people behind ReThink 9/11 have had several campaigns running all over North America including Vancouver, Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco, New York, Dallas and even London, England.
Aleister
reply to post by jude11
All well and good, but I did notice that the ad begins at a point where the first couple seconds of the collapse aren't shown.
When readers have a few minutes here is a skeptical view of the conspiracy argument, ably given by poster OtherSideOfTheCoin. I personally found his thread to be very educational, well presented, and fairly researched.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Aleister
reply to post by Sremmos80
I'm not an expert on the topic, citing chapter and verse and all, so I don't have a horse in this race when it comes to Building 7. But I've read the books, threads, and other presented data on the entire day, it's, of course, a very interesting topic. What I'm saying is that OtherSideOfTheCoin's thread presents data which I had not known before, especially on his excellent opening posts (although he had trouble imbedding quite a few of the cited videos).
zazen
What I'd like to see, and what might turn me around on 9/11, is just one video or film of a building collapsing in that fashion due to fire. Certainly in the history of the world there must be ONE video of a building falling down like that which is NOT due to controlled demolition.
Would not need much more than common sense...
Then you can go to physics and all but that horse is long dry.