Toronto 9/11 Ad Campaign Launched: Subway Riders Will See Footage of WTC 7 Collapse

signalfire
Sigh...

For those who haven't yet seen it, here's a link to the voluminous work done by Jeff Prager regarding the evidence (debunk it if you can) of mini-nukes being used to take down the towers. It's worth looking at just for the amazingly zoomable photos that are included which you won't easily have access to anywhere else.

Jeff Prager Nukes - 911

Funny that this information is so demonized and not discussed fairly, while Judy Wood's cockamamie theories are trotted out over and over again.

The truth appears to be that someone nuked NYC and whoever it is will feel free to do it again if they're not brought to justice. Is your city next in line for the 'no one could ever have imagined' false flag scenario?

Here is another Canadian's view on this

www.henrymakow.com...

999zxcv
Here is another Canadian's view on this

www.henrymakow.com...

A article that starts with a lie....

Ed. Note- This would explain why everything disintegrated into a fine dust

What idiot would claim "everything" disintegrated into fine dust? What makes anyone think a nuke turns everything into dust....

Also I love this claim....

In other words, nuclear devices had been placed under the WTC complex from the time the buildings were constructed for their future demolition.

So now they claim NYC knew there were mini nukes installed in the buildings when they were built...

They also believe no planes hit the WTC buildings...

reply to post by hellobruce


What idiot would claim "everything" disintegrated into fine dust? What makes anyone think a nuke turns everything into dust....

999zxcv
reply to post by hellobruce

 

What idiot would claim "everything" disintegrated into fine dust? What makes anyone think a nuke turns everything into dust....

Nothing turning into dust in that picture, just the spire collapsing down and the lighter dust that was on it remaining behind... in fact in the 3rd picture you can see where it has moved down....

Also please explain why a mini nuke 70m below the basement will cause a spire 400m+ above it to disintegrate, but not disintegrate 400m horizontally...

reply to post by hellobruce


www.bibliotecapleyades.net...

bit in there about demolition

999zxcv
bit in there about demolition

A bit of a problem with that fairy story - the bathtub was not damaged, if it had been damaged the site would have flooded!

spooky24
There is no room for insults in a civilized debate.

The fact remains that until you can put explosives in that building your theories, are, and always be, theories.

There is just as much chance that Jeff and his mini nukes caused the collapse. Or the wind, global warming or moose and squirrel for that matter.

For the last time-opinion is not evidence.

By the way Jeff Prager is an alright guy-he is just trying to make a buck and in this day and age it's hard to criticize that.

Wrong again there, Spooky. Jeff gives the entirety of his research away for free. YOU WOULD KNOW THAT IF YOU HAD BOTHERED TO READ THE MATERIAL. And he specifically calls out Stephen Jones as being a known govt operative who has the training to realize that a nuclear event occurred, but refuses to debate the issue. Thermite is a limited hangout.

Wind, global warming, moose and squirrel? People DIED, and 9-11 was used as an excuse to kill over a million more. Your cavalier attitude towards possible criminal scenarios, and your fellow 'liars' (opposite of truthers, I'm sure you won't mind being so named) only serves to debase your arguments. When are your sort going to realize that you're on the wrong end of global awareness? Take a look at the articles and actual legal hearings on this matter in other countries. The world has gotten a clue, it's about time the few remaining OS sycophants did also.

reply to post by spooky24

There is no room for insults in a civilized debate.

in order to debate, those whom ASSERT must prove......FIRST come the asserted official claims PUSHED as truth.....now 'truthers' are here asking questions and DEMANDING that supporting evidence of those claims pushed....

and you fail to provide that when asked.

so how can one debate when YOU refuse to respond????

The fact remains that until you can put explosives in that building your theories, are, and always be, theories.

lmao.......uhm....the FACT remains that IF you could PROVE FIRE did this as PUSHED.......that alone will make the notion of explosives and accelerants null and void....don't cha think???

WOW!!!!....what a CONCEPT huh!!!!

I could care less about EXPLOSIVES.......prove fire.

For the last time-opinion is not evidence.

the 2005 NIST scientific investigation did not find any reason why these three buildings failed on 9-11...2008 NIST is allowed to ignore their own scientific investigation, and claim fire not only caused collapse, but did so as no other building has done before, stated by Shyam Sunder at the NIST technical briefing
vimeo.com...

Shyam Sunder, all through the Q&A section of the video stating,
"brand new event"
"new phenomenon"
"there has never been a collapse like WTC7".

and the only supporting evidence they have are computer models which they refuse to release the data that tells the models HOW to behave.


.....oh wait....didn't YOU mention something bout opinion vs. evidence?

Danbones
the best way to reach canadians is to use a beer cartoon
to whit:
its friday, you get home from laying blocks all day
( the average canadian guy can lay the whole block in a day)
you have a stack of ten two-fours in the middle of the garage floor
(so you don't have to drink and drive because your truck is shut down, it has no-rad )
you put down the bag with the new tool in it your wife bought you for your birthday ...its a drill
you take out the first beer from the top case...
you pop the cap with a bic lighter because you don't have a bottle opener

suddenly all your cases collapse into a pile of flattened cardboard...
no glass, no leaking precious liquid heading for the drain!
you turn to the camera and in your best buggs bunny voice you say:
"but then, i never studied law"

where did all the beer go?

edit on Tuepm3b20143America/Chicago26 by Danbones because: (no reason given)

edit on Tuepm3b20143America/Chicago26 by Danbones because: (no reason given)

Or this one (for our Canadian lumberjack neighbors):

You chop down a massive tree. It falls at freefall speed, throwing branches 200 feet out laterally circumferentially, and fully 1/3 of the mass of the tree turns into sawdust on the way down, starting at the top. 1000 of the squirrels living in the tree are never seen again, and no DNA from them is ever found, but a few tiny bone fragments of squirrels are found on the roof of buildings hundreds of feet away. No nests, leaves, or nuts were found whatsoever in the debris. The roots of the tree are so hot they melt the stone and dirt they're in contact with for the next 99 days. Many branches turn into what looks like taffy, and bend back on themselves like they've been melted.

Oh, and the dust from the tree contains uranium and the known byproducts of nuclear fission and fusion, which went undetected for several years because the dust experts were trained in toxins and were looking for medical problems and none of them thought of checking the obvious clues of nuclear detonation that were present.

But meanwhile, a couple still living squirrels, having seen the whole thing on videotape, keep yelling for years that it 'all looked quite normal to them!'

reply to post by hellobruce

Nothing turning into dust in that picture, just the spire collapsing down

to which you made the still pics resemble that....

too bad for you the actual video footage shows much different.......it shows solid structure turning to dust...that section of 'core' did not topple.

oh, and BTW.....the HYPOTHESIZED official story states there is a TOP BLOCK pushing both towers to the ground.....how does a top block, crushing all below, magically go around structural mass to leave that still standing, and STILL remain perfectly centered to complete the task of 'crushing all'????

..oh....this must be part of the NIST 08 claimed....."brand new physics phenomenon" that occurred ONLY on 9-11, from Shyam and the bunch....

the bathtub was not damaged

tell me bout that newly found, 40 foot deep 'Glacier hole', in the corner of the bathtub that was discovered???

and WHY they did not see it originally when they BUILT!!!

signalfire
Or this one (for our Canadian lumberjack neighbors):

You chop down a massive tree. It falls at freefall speed, throwing branches 200 feet out laterally circumferentially, and fully 1/3 of the mass of the tree turns into sawdust on the way down, starting at the top. 1000 of the squirrels living in the tree are never seen again, and no DNA from them is ever found, but a few tiny bone fragments of squirrels are found on the roof of buildings hundreds of feet away. No nests, leaves, or nuts were found whatsoever in the debris. The roots of the tree are so hot they melt the stone and dirt they're in contact with for the next 99 days. Many branches turn into what looks like taffy, and bend back on themselves like they've been melted.

Oh, and the dust from the tree contains uranium and the known byproducts of nuclear fission and fusion, which went undetected for several years because the dust experts were trained in toxins and were looking for medical problems and none of them thought of checking the obvious clues of nuclear detonation that were present.

But meanwhile, a couple still living squirrels, having seen the whole thing on videotape, keep yelling for years that it 'all looked quite normal to them!'

hgfbob
too bad for you the actual video footage shows much different.......it shows solid structure turning to dust

No, the actual video footage shows it falling....

tell me bout that newly found, 40 foot deep 'Glacier hole', in the corner of the bathtub that was discovered???
and WHY they did not see it originally when they BUILT!!!

If you had a look at where that hole is they never built anything there originally, so did not excavate there...

specifically calls out Stephen Jones as being a known govt operative

That is somewhat difficult to comprehend. He attempts to keep the debate from sounding to bizarre for most people to even consider it.

He is one of the very few who has gotten rich with his eighth book coming out in January. Good old fashion envy seems to be the motivation.

I am totally aware of Jeff's work from top to bottom.

reply to post by hellobruce

If you had a look at where that hole is they never built anything there originally, so did not excavate there...

...except when making the 'bathtub'.

spooky24

specifically calls out Stephen Jones as being a known govt operative

That is somewhat difficult to comprehend. He attempts to keep the debate from sounding to bizarre for most people to even consider it.

He is one of the very few who has gotten rich with his eighth book coming out in January. Good old fashion envy seems to be the motivation.

I am totally aware of Jeff's work from top to bottom.

Stephen Jones was trotted out by the feds to shout down cold fusion; you'd know all about it if you had read Prager's work. I have no idea what you mean by the above highlighted and bolded sentence, your lack of spelling ability 'to' instead of 'too' notwithstanding.

Since you feel he's gotten rich from his books, please show me where to go to buy one. All I've ever seen is free PDF downloads on his own sites. As a matter of fact, he calls himself an anarchist and claims no copyright whatsoever to the work. He's retired and doesn't appear to need the money, having sold his magazine publishing business a long while ago.

Perhaps you're more privy to his finances than I am, in which case please do something other than insinuate....

If you'd like to 'debate' with him, we're having him on the Out of the Box radio show in a few weeks. Perhaps you'd like to put your money where your mouth is, and go up against a true expert on the topic? Send me a U to U if you're interested and we'll arrange it. You'll need Skype and not to be afraid of microphones. Since Jones refuses to discuss the matter even though he's a trained nuclear physicist, maybe you can take his place. Since you're so familiar with his voluminous research, I'm sure you have plenty of scientific rebuttals all ready to go, right?

The reason why more people outside America don't believe the 9/11 OS is simply because they don't have a patriotic cognitive dissonance effecting them.

a reply to: signalfire

Great, when are the hearings?

*Switches off computer

*Waits...

a reply to: Aleister hahaha I went to the site, pure propaganda piece...makes you a shill, disinformation clown, in collusion with the mass murdering traitors.

The crap your peddling forgets to mention the fire in Bld 7 began in the SEC Evidence locker, with all the "Kenny Boy" Enron stuff linking him to the terrorists inside the Beltway.

The government is rogue. Most everyone has got it through their head these days.

I'm leaning towards a DEW (directed energy weapon) being used. It would explain the un-burnt paper, melted cars and "dustification" of steel. God sees everything.

originally posted by: beijingyank
all the "Kenny Boy" Enron stuff linking him to the terrorists inside the Beltway.

And now that the fire happened literally nobody ever makes the connection between Lay and Bush. Apart from in court cases, plays and widely publicised documentaries.