It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
TrueBrit
reply to post by soulpowertothendegree
It is why I actually find discussing world affairs seriously, rather stimulating, as one is never quite sure about the motivations of ones conversation partner or partners. Of course, it would be more EFFECTIVE for all conversation enacted anywhere to be conducted from a position of honesty, with each person only putting forward their own, unadulterated take on affairs.
TrueBrit
reply to post by rangerdanger
Even I have been accused of that, which is hilarious since I have had so little to do with the government that I have only had a provisional learners driving license for about five months, and do not own a valid passport!
soulpowertothendegree
reply to post by TrueBrit
I agree to a point, but I would rather have honest dialogue and discussion from non-shills/non-trolls. Do you think the practice exist?
rangerdanger
There are lots on ATS if you count all the times people call each other disinfo agents. Usually all it takes is someone to disagree, and boom. They must be a paid disinfo agent.
We'll never know how much, or what % is disinfo so I don't see any point to this thread.
soulpowertothendegree
reply to post by rangerdanger
.my question was what percentage of the world population is actually being paid to do the shilling/trolling act on various web site...