The Church of Satan., page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 30-11-2004 @ 12:39 PM by Masonic Light
Originally posted by sweatmonicaIdo

The thing is, how come they are so against Christianity? Why not all religions in general? CoS seems to direct everything against Christianity.


LaVey borrowed some terminology from the British occult scholar Aleister Crowley, in describing various philosophical outlooks as "Left Hand Path" and "Right Hand Path."

According to Crowley, "Right Hand Path" refers to a spiritual view of life, while "Left Hand Path" is materialistic, regardless of what religion one belongs to, if any. Therefore, according to Crowley, even most Christians follow the "Left Hand Path" because they are materialistically minded, and would rather earn a profit than follow the Right Hand Path taught by Jesus and the other Sages.

I'm not sure if LaVey misunderstood Crowley, or if he just chose to define the terms, but according to LaVey, Satanism is Left Hand Path because it openly embraces materialism. Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, etc. are all "Right Hand Path" according to him.

LaVey was more critical of Christianity than the other Right Hand Paths because he believed that the religion had become hypocritical. This is sort of similar to what Emerson once wrote: "Every Stoic was a Stoic; but in Christendom, where is the Christian?"

From my personal experience, I can relate to what LaVey was saying, at least to some extent, i.e., that many Christians act in such a manner that is diametrically opposed to what Christ taught. For example, consider the recent US presidential elections, where hordes of evangelical Christians supported George W. Bush without a second thought, even though his policies of pre-emptive war under false pretenses, unrestrained capitalism, profit making through exploitation of the environment, and other policies favoring the wealthy are anathema to true Christianity. Although LaVey disagrees with the spiritual point of view held by Buddhists and Hindus, they do not display that type of hypocrisy to LaVey because they attempt to live out their beliefs, and therefore he reserves the bulk of his criticism to Christianity.

Crowley, on the other hand, considered almost all Christians to be practically Satanists. He called Christianity the "Black Lodge" and called Christians "Black Brothers", meaning that Crowley believed they lived to spread materialism, which, ironically, is also what LaVey attempted.


reply posted on 30-11-2004 @ 06:57 PM by TgSoe
Here is a link to an interesting bit on the Temple of Set. Appearently it is going downhill fast as many longtime members are have left.
www.heart7.net...





I also read on another site that Zeena Shreck and her Husband have resigned as of 2002 that site was dis-information.com Temple of Set.

Sub Topic 2002 Schism: The Storm Awakens www.disinfo.com...


There is also an interesting interview with Zeena by Kiki Scar on that site that would lead you to believe that the temple of set is the most advanced black magick in the west. She talks much on sex magick www.black-rose.com...






[edit on 30-11-2004 by TgSoe]



reply posted on 11-1-2005 @ 06:05 AM by TgSoe
Here is an interesting xcerpt from The Joy Of Satan web site.


www.angelfire.com...

Egypt and the old religions are of Satan. Satanism, although the name has been changed, is the original religion. One only needs to have enough knowledge and look with open eyes to see the true meaning of the hieroglyphics, friezes and paintings on the walls of the Egyptian pyramids, in tombs and in temples to see these are instructions for reaching Godhead. The dead were buried there by custom as a message that these were instructions for the afterlife. For one to be reincarnated into a God. The Sacred Serpent is seen everywhere in Ancient Egyptian friezes, paintings, carvings and relics. The Serpent represents SATAN.


That site has a lot of interesting things to say about Satanism. I think most people equate Satanism with rebellious teens and not powerful leaders.


reply posted on 12-1-2005 @ 12:42 PM by undercoverchef
Originally posted by IhaveNoClue
Do not take that which does not belong to you unless it is a burden to the other person and he cries out to be relieved.

Do not complain about anything to which you need not subject yourself.

Do not harm little children. and...

When walking in open territory, bother no one. If someone bothers you, ask him to stop. If he does not stop, destroy him.



Oh yes I'm sure if Satan had a church himself this rules would be followed to a tee. What's the point of members belonging to a chruch with rules that do not make sense dealing with the nature of the creation.



The thing with Satan is he is the great deceiver... He is hardly going to say...

Thou shalt kill babies on Sunday

Thou shalt sacrifice virgins in my honour

Come on think about it... the whole point of crazy sects like this is to lure people in under the pretence of actually being a rather nice organization. Only after time do they show there true colours. And before anyone says…

"Oh but Magus Anton Szandor LaVey clearly says that he does not worship the devil or harm anyone etc…"

Er... yeah ok... I want to make a point against the Israeli occupation of Palestine so I start a group called the Nazis??? Hmmm I don’t think so. Anyone with half the intelligence this bloke is supposed to have would not chose the word Satan to make a point to Christians. He could have called his little group anything he wanted but he chose a word that would deeply offend Christians and prevent most of them from ever reading the "clever" points he is trying to make.

It is not very clever to ask someone to stick there fingers in there ears before you try and make a point. Most of the people who read/follow this will have had a major gripe against Christians in the first place.

And as for the comment that Satanists are just “bad Christians” or “Rebelious Christians” The whole point of Satanists is that they REJECT Christ and his teachings!

Christians try to live there life according to Jesus teachings, Hence the term Chist-ians.

Let’s not forget that Hitler had Jewish blood. You don’t call a Nazi a rebellious Jew. That would have to be the most offensive thing you could say to our Jewish brothers and sisters.

Just my belief

Hope I haven’t offended anyone

Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



A masons ring of the 32nd degree
  Posted 7 days ago with 11 member flags
The Court System and Freemasonry.
  Posted 1 days ago with 8 member flags
Exposing Freemasons & 33 - Geometry,Astrology, or Devil Worship?
  Posted 2 days ago with 7 member flags
FACT: Buzz Aldrin claimed moon as a Scottish Rite \'Territory\'
  Posted 10 days ago with 6 member flags
Bimbo\'s Initiation
  Posted 18 days ago with 5 member flags
We Are the Modern Illuminati
  Posted 14 days ago with 4 member flags
Murdered By Freemasons?
  Posted 12 days ago with 4 member flags