It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
poet1b
If you have an electrically neutral hydrogen atom, and the electron separates from the proton, you have 2 ions, the proton and the electron.
dragonridr
Ok im going to make this easy for you and keep it simple. Yes hydrogen can be used to make protons yes there can be hydrogen ions which is plasma.But a free proton is a particle we call them hadrons maybe this is your confusion.
poet1b
Um, the sun can't be 90% plasma, and 90% hydrogen, unless that plasma is considered to be hydrogen.
poet1b
I think you have a point, a plasma is not really electrically neutral, but institutionalized science seems to need to see plasma as electrically neutral.
Mary Rose
Maybe institutionalized science describes things the way they do because they don't want the sun to be electric.
if you ionize helium you get helium ions, that is correct. Helium ions should have two protons (and depending on the isotope, some neutrons) while hydrogen ions should have one proton.
Mary Rose
poet1b
Um, the sun can't be 90% plasma, and 90% hydrogen, unless that plasma is considered to be hydrogen.
poet1b
I think you have a point, a plasma is not really electrically neutral, but institutionalized science seems to need to see plasma as electrically neutral.
Maybe institutionalized science describes things the way they do because they don't want the sun to be electric.
poet1b
reply to post by GetHyped
REALLY! Science is drawn from evidence?
I missed the televised version of when they landed probes on the sun and gathered this evidence.
Most of the scientific theories on atomic structure, plasma, the sun, and the cosmos is developed from a long history of unproven theories. People who think otherwise, know nothing about science.
The idea that our scientists have it all figured out is adolescent.
poet1b
reply to post by GetHyped
REALLY! Science is drawn from evidence? I missed the televised version of when they landed probes on the sun and gathered this evidence.
Most of the scientific theories on atomic structure, plasma, the sun, and the cosmos is developed from a long history of unproven theories. People who think otherwise, know nothing about science.
The idea that our scientists have it all figured out is adolescent.
edit on 8-3-2014 by poet1b because: no to know
but nobody ask if the first discovery was real
dragonridr
Mary Rose
poet1b
Um, the sun can't be 90% plasma, and 90% hydrogen, unless that plasma is considered to be hydrogen.
poet1b
I think you have a point, a plasma is not really electrically neutral, but institutionalized science seems to need to see plasma as electrically neutral.
Maybe institutionalized science describes things the way they do because they don't want the sun to be electric.
Or maybe you dont understand how electrons work its really simple. If an object has less electrons than protons its positively charged and if it has more electrons than protons its negatively charged. And if an atom contains equal numbers of protons and electrons, the atom is described as being electrically neutral. Now if we break down an atom further we get ions that being of course proton neutron and electron.Now in plasma we can get electrons to transfer energy see electrons love to change locations whether its into another orbit or another atom it doesnt care. So it is how energy is transferred from one atom to another.For example a fluorescent bulb an electron hits a mercury atom taking it to a higher energy level. This is unstable so the extra energy is emitted as a photon and the mercury atom returns to its normal energy state.And this leads to the problem we have with the electric sun theory. We have to introduce energy by electron transfer from somewhere. But there is no power source to supply the energy in the first place.See when we look into the sun we should see a flow of electrons entering the sun but we dont its not there. Now you're more than welcome to tell us where this energy comes from to excite the atoms in the sun to produce light it has to come from somewhere.
Or maybe you dont understand how electrons work its really simple.
Your theory is, the Nickolaus must be real.
Phage
reply to post by KrzYma
but nobody ask if the first discovery was real
Can you be more specific?
Which first discovery, in particular, are you questioning? Which was the "first?"
On the other hand, which is the first "discovery" which supports the electric sun notion? Or is that just speculation too?
edit on 3/8/2014 by Phage because: (no reason given)
Phage
reply to post by KrzYma
Your theory is, the Nickolaus must be real.
Until you actually observe your parents putting the gifts under the tree. Your theory has then been falsified.
edit on 3/8/2014 by Phage because: (no reason given)
Who said anything about "proof?"
proof the atom model we have is real, electrons as particles surrounding the protons.
Actually, it's not a matter of keeping kids from thinking. My daughter is a critical thinker and figured it out on her own. But, it works quite well to help younger kids behave during the holiday season when they are indoors too much.
sure, but the parents don't want you to discover that, so anything you get is lies, to keep you from thinking
Prove they visit us and then we can discuss it.
Just one questions, if the Universe is full of life, like the statistics say, and some of them visit us, and have for securities, our theory don't allow speed faster then light however, how did they get there ??
if true
Phage
reply to post by KrzYma
Actually, it's not a matter of keeping kids from thinking. My daughter is a critical thinker and figured it out on her own. But, it works quite well to help younger kids behave during the holiday season when they are indoors too much.
sure, but the parents don't want you to discover that, so anything you get is lies, to keep you from thinking
Prove they visit us and then we can discuss it.
Just one questions, if the Universe is full of life, like the statistics say, and some of them visit us, and have for securities, our theory don't allow speed faster then light however, how did they get there ??
if true
I assume you believe the people who works for the government ?
Phage
reply to post by KrzYma
I assume you believe the people who works for the government ?
Sure, anyone is welcome to their opinion. Did Hellyer provide evidence that UFOs are extraterrestrial, or did he say "This is my own view." Oh, yes he did say that, didn't he? At about 2:45.
Sorry, someone saying that they believe we are being visited is not proof that we are. Sort of off topic though.