It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Bisman
reply to post by FraternitasSaturni
meat is meat. the only reason i wouldnt eat a person is out of respect. (though if my soccer team crash landed on a mountain, i just may)
but i dont respect a cat the same as a person. because its an animal. a resource that either entertains me as a pet, or feeds me when im starving to death.
Lazarus Short
Cracked.com? Seriously?!
ProfessorChaos
JohnPhoenix
LiveForever8
reply to post by JohnPhoenix
As for your Hitler comparison...what are you on about? These weren't cold, heartless murderers slaughtering millions without a second thought.
Er.. how do you know? Seems to me murdering your beloved pet by order of the government is just as cold and heartless as Hitlers actions. No.. in many ways this is much worse than Hitler's holocaust. The government didn't want people to be humane and take care of their pets. They deemed pets do not deserve to live so they made the owners kill them. (I wonder how many children wound up eating their pets!) They turned all Britains citizens into murderers. That's worse.
Normal people do do things just as evil as Hitler and yet - we tend to think nothing of it and or forget it quickly. That's my point.
You may be right.. perhaps they were not cold and heartless.. just stupid.
BTW folks, I have nothing against the British. In fact I love them and have many friends from across the pond. I'd have posted the same thread if this happened in America or any where else.edit on 1-1-2014 by JohnPhoenix because: sp
So by your logic, it would have made more sense to let all of those animals die of starvation? I was expecting something FAR different when I clicked on this thread.
By the way, it was a government recommendation, not an order. If anything, it was the most humane thing that could have been done; these were domesticated animals that were not necessarily prepared to fend for themselves in the wild, and what do you think would have been done to a starving dog caught snacking on a dead human body? Yep, they would have been shot on the spot.
I'm sure a great many of those families (particularly the children) were absolutely brokenhearted to know that this was indeed the only true option for the situation.
Comparing this to Hitler's holocaust is silly at best.
nixie_nox
P.S. Here is a little reality check. 56% of dogs and 71% of cats that enter shelters, get euthanized.
Almost 4 million animals are put down in the US each year.
And we have the money and the needs to take care of them, but we don't. At least the Briish had a good excuse during WWII.
The holocaust is going on now, and for no good reason.
Worry about the problem now, of the millions of animals euthanized each year due to negligence, and the 25 million animals that are homeless and suffering NOW.
nixie_nox
P.S. Here is a little reality check. 56% of dogs and 71% of cats that enter shelters, get euthanized.
Almost 4 million animals are put down in the US each year.
And we have the money and the needs to take care of them, but we don't. At least the Briish had a good excuse during WWII.
The holocaust is going on now, and for no good reason.
Worry about the problem now, of the millions of animals euthanized each year due to negligence, and the 25 million animals that are homeless and suffering NOW.