It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
even those M9's we see are just small movements when you consider the size of the Planet, whats 2-24 metres of movement (Japan Tohoku earthquake on March 11, 2011) compared to the 40,075.16 kilometers circumference of the Planet?
originally posted by: PuterMan
a reply to: muzzy
even those M9's we see are just small movements when you consider the size of the Planet, whats 2-24 metres of movement (Japan Tohoku earthquake on March 11, 2011) compared to the 40,075.16 kilometers circumference of the Planet?
Can one actually compare the vertical motion to the horizontal distance around the earth?
The fault dimensions for Japan seem to vary between 300km x 150km and 500km x 200km depending on who you read, and the estimate fault length for Cascadia in a total fault slip is 1000km. Whilst that is still a small proportion of the planet's circumference (2.5%) it is a better comparison than the vertical movement.
Good stuff....! Thank you Mr. Puterman.
2nd.
Click the image to enlarge
From Kamchatka to the triple junction south of New Zealand, walking the 'joints' is about 18,500km at say 1000km width (none of this is actually possible in a single event) giving a surface area of rupture of 18.5 million square km
I went away and created a very approximate calculator of the relationship between rupture length and width based on New Empirical Relationships among Magnitude, Rupture Length, Rupture Width, Rupture Area, and Surface Displacement (PDF:Wells & Coppersmith 1994) It also seems to match the smaller image above - a calculation by an Australian company so we must be working on the same lines.
Click the image to enlarge
The purple bands are just to make it easier for you to follow a line. This chart shows the lengths from 1 to the circumference of the earth and from 1 to 250 km in width.
Fortunately a 500km long x 200 kn wide rupture does work out to a Mag 9 hopefully validating the calculations. At 1000 km length the width of the rupture is 100 km to produce a Mag 9. Think about this in relation to Cascadia !!!
Based on this calc a complete west side event in the Pacific from Kamchatka to south of NZ would be 65km wide to reach a Mag 10.
Mag 10 is shown in a different colour as it is beyond the realms of human knowledge as to whether that has actually happened before. The first Mag 10 point is 4000km length x 250km wide so just maybe not beyond the bounds of credibility.
originally posted by: berkeleygal
a reply to: abecedarian
Wow, look at that! I posted just before you did and man, look at the aftershocks!
The quake was originally listed as a 4.8 magnitude but was downgraded. There were no reports of damage. But the quake was felt across a wide area of the Inland Empire as well as parts of L.A. and Orange counties, according to the USGS.
According to the USGS, the epicenter was nine miles from Lake Arrowhead, nine miles from Big Bear City and 14 miles from Highland. Twitter posts indicate that quake was felt in downtown Los Angeles and Silver Lake.
In the last 10 days, there have been no earthquakes magnitude 3.0 and greater centered nearby.
Actually, it's still there but it was downgraded to 4.6 and the previous 4.6 is now 3.4.
originally posted by: berkeleygal
a reply to: abecedarian
They have taken this one off...
4.8
6km ENE of Running Springs, California
2014-07-05 11:59:34 UTC-05:00
8.7 km