It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I didnt say the water IS the fuel.
And sprouting your "inteligence"
doesnt help...
I as in ME still need water to get to the hydrogen,
so i can burn it. Right
Serdgiam
I based it on what they said they were doing and the references they state?
Mary Rose
"Moray King: Closed-Loop Water Fuel Cell - Water Cohering Zero-Point Energy: A Self-Running, Open Source Project."
A hypothesis for explaining excess energy production is that the pulsing electrolyzer produces charged water gas clusters, which activate and coherently capture zero-point energy into the cluster, thus raising the water’s energy state [1].
BERKELEY, CA – Scientists with the U.S. Department of Energy's Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) appear to have settled a long-standing scientific question about water clusters – aggregates of water molecules that feature unique properties, somewhere between that of liquid water and steam. Experiments led by Daniel Neumark, director of Berkeley Lab's Chemical Sciences Division, have identified two distinct forms of negatively charged water clusters, thereby providing new insight into the fundamentally important interaction between electrons and water. . . .
boncho
reply to post by Miccey
I didnt say the water IS the fuel.
And sprouting your "inteligence"
doesnt help...
I as in ME still need water to get to the hydrogen,
so i can burn it. Right
No you don't. Technically you could do this (among others):
H2SO4 + Zn ===> ZnSO4 + H2
Novice chemistry.
High School Chemistry Guide
Ah, so i take some other mtrl and heat it up and get Hydrogen.
So the example at the top, the one with MG, how "effective"
is that compared to splitting water....
Miccey
Oh sorry, didnt get that we are looking at the WHOLE picture
all of a sudden...
And the example with heating vs splitting,
you tell me...I have no idea. I know that
using electricity to split water and heating
an "element" are kind of different, thats
why i wanted to know wich one is MORE
effective. Im the novice....
Teach, if you can. But be careful.
Miccey
reply to post by boncho
I said be careful...
Using a bunsenburner is heating right???
Im the novice here remember...
*
High-temperature electrolysis[edit]
Main article: High-temperature electrolysis
High-temperature electrolysis (also HTE or steam electrolysis) is a method currently being investigated for water electrolysis with a heat engine. High temperature electrolysis may be preferable to traditional room-temperature electrolysis because some of the energy is supplied as heat, which is cheaper than electricity, and because the electrolysis reaction is more efficient at higher temperatures.[10][11]
Miccey
Ok cost efficiancy...
Gasoline or hydrogen...
In terms of making it yourself...
I as in ME, must be able to do it.
Here and now...Not as in a oilshiejk.
Ordinary 95o gasoline is 14.33swe kr/L
ca... little over 2$ PER LITRE...
If my calc is correct thats about 8$/g
x1358 = 13.6MJ
Hydrogen, gas[7] (MJ/L) 0.01005
34.2MJ
Gasoline (petrol)[11] (MJ/L) 34.2
Miccey
Ok cost efficiancy...
Gasoline or hydrogen...
In terms of making it yourself...
I as in ME, must be able to do it.
Here and now...Not as in a oilshiejk.
Ordinary 95o gasoline is 14.33swe kr/L
ca... little over 2$ PER LITRE...
If my calc is correct thats about 8$/g
Cost, pure: $12 per 100g
Source: Hydrogen is prepared commercially by reacting superheated steam with methane or carbon. In the laboratory, hydrogen can be produced by the action of acids on metals such as zinc or magnesium, or by the electrolysis of water (shown on the left).