It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
captaintyinknots
reply to post by Mikeultra
Why is that suspicious? Thats what they were there to do.
Mikeultra
How about the fact that it was an FBI SWAT unit that "found" Shoop. That's suspicious.
JBA2848
It is more suspicious that Kevin Shoop was at the mall a half hour before the call went out about a guy with a gun? He found a note and was at the mall looking for his brother before 9:00. He knew what vehicle he had. He would of known where his brother would most likely park and enter it becomes habit to use the same parking area and entrance at malls. So what is the rest of this story?
opethPA
Mikeultra
How about the fact that it was an FBI SWAT unit that "found" Shoop. That's suspicious.
Why is it suspicious that a team who were looking for the suspect found him?
JBA2848
reply to post by Krakatoa
This article also states the family contacted the police.
www.nj.com...
Then why was the house raided if they were talking with the police about what was going on?
www.nj.com...
Do you really raid a house when you are talking to them about finding a family member?
JBA2848
reply to post by Krakatoa
They "raid the house" as you put it
N.J. mall shooting: Police raid house of possible suspect
www.nj.com...
The article put it that way. And they have photos of the event. You should look at links people provide unless your only pushing your own story and not facts from the media with evidence photos.
JBA2848
reply to post by Krakatoa
They "raid the house" as you put it
N.J. mall shooting: Police raid house of possible suspect
www.nj.com...
The article put it that way. And they have photos of the event. You should look at links people provide unless your only pushing your own story and not facts from the media with evidence photos.
there ya go again, stating baseless theory as fact.
Mikeultra
opethPA
Mikeultra
How about the fact that it was an FBI SWAT unit that "found" Shoop. That's suspicious.
Why is it suspicious that a team who were looking for the suspect found him?
Out of 500 SWAT, it's the FEDS that find him. They pulled rank on everyone, and along with their buddies at ATF staged their discovery in the basement. This is part of an anti-gun agenda being pushed by the administration.
captaintyinknots
there ya go again, stating baseless theory as fact.
Mikeultra
opethPA
Mikeultra
How about the fact that it was an FBI SWAT unit that "found" Shoop. That's suspicious.
Why is it suspicious that a team who were looking for the suspect found him?
Out of 500 SWAT, it's the FEDS that find him. They pulled rank on everyone, and along with their buddies at ATF staged their discovery in the basement. This is part of an anti-gun agenda being pushed by the administration.
Or can you back this one up with anything?
captaintyinknots
reply to post by Mikeultra
A bunch of ovezealous politicians is not evidence that this was staged, or that anything was planted, as you claimed. Care to try again?
I never said I wasn't willing to consider that there was more at play. In fact, I'd say its a certainly.
Mikeultra
captaintyinknots
reply to post by Mikeultra
A bunch of ovezealous politicians is not evidence that this was staged, or that anything was planted, as you claimed. Care to try again?
You're not even going to consider anything from the recent past as proof of a pattern of shootings and then major campaigns against Americans 2nd Amendment rights? It's been done in the U.K., Australia, and Canada.
captaintyinknots
I never said I wasn't willing to consider that there was more at play. In fact, I'd say its a certainly.
Mikeultra
captaintyinknots
reply to post by Mikeultra
A bunch of ovezealous politicians is not evidence that this was staged, or that anything was planted, as you claimed. Care to try again?
You're not even going to consider anything from the recent past as proof of a pattern of shootings and then major campaigns against Americans 2nd Amendment rights? It's been done in the U.K., Australia, and Canada.
What I am saying, what you always seem to miss when we get into this, is that maki g statements of fact, such as "this is a false flag" or"the fbi found him so they must have planted something", without providing a single piece of solid evidence to back up the statement, hurts the cause. It doesn't help anything.
Furthermore, to have made up your mind despite a lack of evidence, and to then label all who don't agree with you 100% as conformists and the such is no better than blindly following the msm narrative.edit on 6-11-2013 by captaintyinknots because: (no reason given)
captaintyinknots
I never said I wasn't willing to consider that there was more at play. In fact, I'd say its a certainly.
Mikeultra
captaintyinknots
reply to post by Mikeultra
A bunch of ovezealous politicians is not evidence that this was staged, or that anything was planted, as you claimed. Care to try again?
You're not even going to consider anything from the recent past as proof of a pattern of shootings and then major campaigns against Americans 2nd Amendment rights? It's been done in the U.K., Australia, and Canada.
What I am saying, what you always seem to miss when we get into this, is that maki g statements of fact, such as "this is a false flag" or"the fbi found him so they must have planted something", without providing a single piece of solid evidence to back up the statement, hurts the cause. It doesn't help anything.
Furthermore, to have made up your mind despite a lack of evidence, and to then label all who don't agree with you 100% as conformists and the such is no better than blindly following the msm narrative.edit on 6-11-2013 by captaintyinknots because: (no reason given)
Krakatoa
JBA2848
reply to post by Krakatoa
They "raid the house" as you put it
N.J. mall shooting: Police raid house of possible suspect
www.nj.com...
The article put it that way. And they have photos of the event. You should look at links people provide unless your only pushing your own story and not facts from the media with evidence photos.
I see, media that conveniently now is believable when in the past, they were unreliable and not to be trusted, and "in on the game". Please...pick a side....and don't use them when it meets your needs.