It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
AfterInfinity
Actually, that's a Chinese philosophy. The theory goes that because of the yin and yang, if you are smacked on the cheek, you can turn the other cheek and they won't hit you again because they believe in balance.
Don't believe everything you hear, and do your bloody research, for crying out loud.
FreeMason
How can a state be restricted on what rights are socially acceptable unless those rights go beyond popularity and are given by God.
Either you accept the ability of government to restrict any right or some are inalienable by God.
Cant have it both ways.
Agreed?
Dondylion
AfterInfinity
reply to post by FreeMason
Either you accept the ability of government to restrict any right or some are inalienable by God.
It says "Creator", not "God". So for all we know, they were talking about a force completely distinct from your god.
Exactly. How can we know they weren't talking about our parents? Aren't they technically our "Creators" since they had to have sex in order to create us? Creator =/= God.
So you're saying if you infringe on someone else's rights then you basically annul/forfeit your own rights?
Even though they may be natural/God given?
How can you or other people take or give away / suspend / cancel your God given, inalienable rights?
What if you DON'T get caught or are indicted but found NOT guilty (despite being so)?
Then you get to keep your rights even though you've infringed on someone else's?
So basically, if you're a skilled and/or lucky enough criminal... no consequences for you for your crime?
You get to keep your rights?
I'm not the one making you look like hypocrites.
I'm merely exposing contradictions, flaws and inconsistencies in your reasoning and arguments.
Dondylion
AfterInfinity
reply to post by FreeMason
Either you accept the ability of government to restrict any right or some are inalienable by God.
It says "Creator", not "God". So for all we know, they were talking about a force completely distinct from your god.
Exactly. How can we know they weren't talking about our parents? Aren't they technically our "Creators" since they had to have sex in order to create us? Creator =/= God.
“Man was born free, and he is everywhere in chains. Those who think themselves the masters of others are indeed greater slaves than they.” ― Jean-Jacques Rousseau
“Every man having been born free and master of himself, no one else may under any pretext whatever subject him without his consent. To assert that the son of a slave is born a slave is to assert that he is not born a man.” ― Jean-Jacques Rousseau, The Social Contract
muzzleflash
How are there all the pages of debate?
The OP quotes are wrong by technicality.
Didn't actually read the books referenced, big mistake.
I actually read it for a report so I remember.
If even vaguely.
How this got religious oriented?
Because people have opinions....
But how many know the Facts???
TKDRL
reply to post by FreeMason
Give it up, creator is a generic word. They didn't use god, jesus, allah, zeus, or any other diety. They used creator to apply to all the religions, even those without any religion. One of the biggest reasons the US even happened, was religious bigotry in europe. No way the founders would slant the US, toward any one religion. Learn history.edit on Sun, 20 Oct 2013 00:54:58 -0500 by TKDRL because: (no reason given)
TKDRL
reply to post by Nephalim
I have no idea what you are trying to say, unless you are trying to say the same thing I did....
FreeMason
Dondylion
AfterInfinity
reply to post by FreeMason
Either you accept the ability of government to restrict any right or some are inalienable by God.
It says "Creator", not "God". So for all we know, they were talking about a force completely distinct from your god.
Exactly. How can we know they weren't talking about our parents? Aren't they technically our "Creators" since they had to have sex in order to create us? Creator =/= God.
No they begat us which is wholly different from creation and since the signers were Christian their intentions are plain.
Nephalim
reply to post by Dondylion
I just did. Here is another
Divine Providence
Supreme Judge of the world
loledit on 20-10-2013 by Nephalim because: (no reason given)
Nephalim
Even if you believe that, your parents are your creator, then you were born with rights that are yours, that which is yours is yours, and others are not to take away what they did not create.