It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Hence, the initial roll-out glitches were intentionally initiated.
SWCCFAN
Remember when Obama wanted to spread the wealth around?
EarthCitizen07
reply to post by Flatfish
Whats the point of having capitalism if you cant make any profit? Do you work for free?
The problem is lawyers and doctors make too much money in relation to the services they provide. Sure medical and law school are over-priced and graduates are over-burdened with debt. One should look into all these problems to determine a solution.
Forcing everyone to have medical insurance is not like car insurance where a serious accident with an uninsured driver can cost you time, hassle and money. If you cant afford healthcare insurance you are only risking your own life and health, not someone elses. State welfare has been covering the poor for a long time now.
Onslaught2996
reply to post by Daedalus
Prove anything you just said. Stop parroting right wing lies. Then I can answer you honestly.edit on 6-10-2013 by Onslaught2996 because: (no reason given)
Deetermined
I don't see the "glitches" as intentional on Obama's part because that would make him look like too big of a fool for trying to roll it out too early when he had the chance for a pass/delay. Here's what I do think...
1. I believe that Obama might stoop so low as to blame the Republicans for hacking the ACA computer system making it inaccessible.
2. I believe that the blame is turning more towards the Democrats now that Americans are unhappy with the roll-out and the pricing sticker shock. I believe the longer the government shutdown continues, the more Republicans will be able to convince Americans that the program isn't going to be affordable or work the way they expected.
3. I believe that the longer the government shutdown goes on, the more Americans are going to view Obama and Reid as sadists for having kicked old people out of their homes who were living on federally owned land and unnecessarily roughed up veterans for visiting memorials while trying to delay their benefits.
edit on 7-10-2013 by Deetermined because: (no reason given)
xuenchen
Corporatism is ultra Left Wing, not right wing !!!!!
eggman90
That's the issue. I don't lump doctors in with lawyers at all. Doctors used to make good money, as they should. But since the insurance companies collude over fixing payouts and fees, the doctors have to run a revolving door in their practice to make money. The profit goes to the insurance companies. In Denmark, where medicine is socialized, you can wait all day to see a doctor, and wade through a room full of people with everything from runny noses to major illness. The doctors don't get paid more either way. How much time can he/she take with you in that scenario?
Bassago
Onslaught2996
So an actual republican took the time to read and sign up and guess what...found out it isn't as bad as the right wingers love to say.
Maybe because he gets a 72% subsidy on his healthcare plan. If we got the same maybe it wouldn't be so bad.
Obama care is a train wreck. (there fixed it for you)
edit on 992pm5858pm52013 by Bassago because: (no reason given)
EarthCitizen07
reply to post by The Benevolent Adversary
Both of the big parties are for statism, corporatism and globalism. The only minor difference is that republicans want to spend more for the military industrial complex than for welfare, while the democrats want to spend more for welfare and less for military industrial complex.
The differences are so trivial its hardely worth discussing!