It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
luxordelphi
reply to post by Silverlok
The advanced materials, in play within the infrastructure since approx. the late 1990's, without naming the rose, are new cements for roads and water mains, materials for switches and ties for railroads, bars and bolts for bridges, etc. Not actually as cryptic as it sounds because the materials are in constant flux - a dynamic process to fine-tune and make better.
The materials are not able to readily absorb heat but have a lot of surface area where heat can collect, unable to dissipate. Biological agents have also been used in the mix. Some materials simply become brittle and crumble while still looking pristine on the surface. Water, for some, within the atomic structure, is the enemy and can cause unseen degradation.
The ingredients you describe are actually all, already present within the materials themselves. Incidence is throughout the country (countries) with (this is not anywhere near conclusive) seemingly less problem in arid climates and more in humidity.
radiation works on the order of the square, thermal retention/generation works on the order of the cube
now apply that concept to...any part of your assertion
luxordelphi
reply to post by Silverlok
In the case of certain dark colored particles smaller than a wavelength of light, heat collects at the surface. So there's some difficulty with your Jack Handy thought:
radiation works on the order of the square, thermal retention/generation works on the order of the cube
In humidity, even more heat can collect because the area seals in the heat with a bubble of steam. We might use this to extrapolate what oil, not uncommon on a roadway, might do.
now apply that concept to...any part of your assertion
Less than a watt, in some circumstances, can create a couple hundred degrees.
Winter and frozen ground also become irrelevant.
luxordelphi
reply to post by Silverlok
It's not really colloids or micro systems that I mean. Colloids in gel or foam, I guess, are considered solid in solid but I'm talking more solid than that. Micro is pretty small but I'm talking smaller.
In attempting to continue this dialogue with you, I ran across geosynthetic soil reinforcement using advanced materials wherein the reinforced soil then behaves like a composite. This behavior seems to have come as somewhat of a surprise. Found a comprehensive conference that took place last year on these systems and the bulk of presentation was research on failure mechanisms. So I think I've found what I was looking for sparked by your intriguing thread.
The thing that interested me originally was a sinkhole in a fairly newly repaired roadway using advanced materials for the repair. Drilling, fracking, mining and underground building, except for a water main (also newly repaired) didn't seem to play a part. This geosynthetic soil reinforcement would also be used in order to be able to build in areas that wouldn't otherwise support building. So there again, composite failures could be responsible for some sinkholes.
Ancient sinkholes and I guess even some calderas might come under your mechanisms. That is, of course, if we don't presuppose cyclical civilizations with similar patterns and ends and, therefore, ancient composite failures due to ancient geosynthetic soil reinforcement efforts using then advanced but now outdated materials.
and
are ancient civilization "artifacts" involved ? ..that discussion of prevalence or "whys"is not anywhere the first domino of HOW,
which is what I am asking
31And it came to pass, as he had made an end of speaking all these words, that the ground clave asunder that was under them:
32And the earth opened her mouth, and swallowed them up, and their houses, and all the men that appertained unto Korah, and all their goods.
what do you mean by composite( I understand the 'implication ' of the usage) but please elaborate about the 'boundaries' of the localized composition and thermal transactions based on time ( and pressure) ?
What are the properties of the advanced materials that produce different results from the (historically?) used "un" advanced materials? ( in relation to sink holes ..please)
To be specific , open pit mines produces acid runoff ...why?
if ( as is now generally accepted) the weird ass ground booms are from substrata cracking then those sub strata cracks become the heat vents that power sinkholes
luxordelphi
reply to post by Silverlok
An eyewitness report, though inconvenient, still remains what it is - an eyewitness report. There are actually some aspects of that ancient (3300 +/- year old) sinkhole report that coincide with some of your assumptions: a desert in the mid-latitudes (border-line sub-tropics.) I was throwing you a bone.
But...I really have a problem with this part of your post (the part where you explain 'mine slag' and somehow tie it to 'mysterious booming sounds' as long as there is a large subterranean rock and then you wind up by saying that this is now 'generally accepted.'):
if ( as is now generally accepted) the weird ass ground booms are from substrata cracking then those sub strata cracks become the heat vents that power sinkholes
(...sorry - using notepad which won't support your original bold and larger type...)
So...are you now trolling your own thread?
Further, I made it clear before that heat from below is not a prerequisite in the particular sinkholes I've been studying because, depending on the materials used, and the stresses and environmental conditions experienced, they make their own heat. And quite a bit of it.
Komodo
reply to post by TrueAmerican
Not that tuff..
BIG thread already started just after christmas last year..
Sinkhole Watch 2013
Well first I think you'd have to establish that sinkholes are increasing,
Komodo
reply to post by Rezlooper
excellent thread btw..!
now with all those alerts, I wounder which ones are dublicated from others.. goggle just spits out whatever website is posting the tigger name..
or is it? Is each one of these a seperate instance?? if so .. I'm feeling a bit more uneasy ..
Silverlok
Komodo
reply to post by Rezlooper
excellent thread btw..!
now with all those alerts, I wounder which ones are dublicated from others.. goggle just spits out whatever website is posting the tigger name..
or is it? Is each one of these a seperate instance?? if so .. I'm feeling a bit more uneasy ..
..a bit more uneasy about what?
( an interesting aside : in the CIA handbook about 'misdirection' using misspelling on purpose in the internet environ tends to give the casual viewer more confidence in the "authenticity" of the poster)
so ..again a few facts ( remember we are trying to do science here ...your supposition is just that ...you support it with no theoretical basis beyond implied supposition ...interesting in and of itself)
so to get back to the subject :
ARE sinkholes ( vertical circular columns ) formed as cavities in the soil from thermally induced chemical reactions based on the difference between heat transfers "radiation " surface area verses density ?
Komodo
reply to post by Rezlooper
excellent thread btw..!
now with all those alerts, I wounder which ones are dublicated from others.. goggle just spits out whatever website is posting the tigger name..
or is it? Is each one of these a seperate instance?? if so .. I'm feeling a bit more uneasy ..
Komodo
Silverlok
Komodo
reply to post by Rezlooper
excellent thread btw..!
now with all those alerts, I wounder which ones are dublicated from others.. goggle just spits out whatever website is posting the tigger name..
or is it? Is each one of these a seperate instance?? if so .. I'm feeling a bit more uneasy ..
..a bit more uneasy about what?
( an interesting aside : in the CIA handbook about 'misdirection' using misspelling on purpose in the internet environ tends to give the casual viewer more confidence in the "authenticity" of the poster)
so ..again a few facts ( remember we are trying to do science here ...your supposition is just that ...you support it with no theoretical basis beyond implied supposition ...interesting in and of itself)
so to get back to the subject :
ARE sinkholes ( vertical circular columns ) formed as cavities in the soil from thermally induced chemical reactions based on the difference between heat transfers "radiation " surface area verses density ?
I have NO idea..
what you are trying to say ..
say it .. and say it plainly so all of us can understand.. !!!
wow ~!!
Silverlok
Komodo
Silverlok
Komodo
reply to post by Rezlooper
excellent thread btw..!
now with all those alerts, I wounder which ones are dublicated from others.. goggle just spits out whatever website is posting the tigger name..
or is it? Is each one of these a seperate instance?? if so .. I'm feeling a bit more uneasy ..
..a bit more uneasy about what?
( an interesting aside : in the CIA handbook about 'misdirection' using misspelling on purpose in the internet environ tends to give the casual viewer more confidence in the "authenticity" of the poster)
so ..again a few facts ( remember we are trying to do science here ...your supposition is just that ...you support it with no theoretical basis beyond implied supposition ...interesting in and of itself)
so to get back to the subject :
ARE sinkholes ( vertical circular columns ) formed as cavities in the soil from thermally induced chemical reactions based on the difference between heat transfers "radiation " surface area verses density ?
I have NO idea..
what you are trying to say ..
say it .. and say it plainly so all of us can understand.. !!!
wow ~!!
learn how to read( from the post previous to yours)
"ARE sinkholes ( vertical circular columns ) formed as cavities in the soil from thermally induced chemical reactions based on the difference between heat transfers "radiation " surface area verses density ? "
or stop posting
CAN I MAKE IT SIMPLER...or perhaps try making your questions contentual...meaning I cannot define things not asked..or not even defined
your intelligence or ignorance is not defined so how can I talk to you "plainly" about ANY subjectedit on 24-9-2013 by Silverlok because: drunkfingers