Breaking: Diana Death: Police Passed New Information

Breaking: Diana Death: Police Passed New Information

news.sky.com

Scotland Yard is assessing new information on the death Princess Diana to determine whether it is credible.

The assessment will be carried out by Metropolitan Police officers from the Specialist Crime and Operations Command.

The deaths of the Princess of Wales and Dodi al Fayed in Paris in 1997 were investigated and examined by an inquest led by Lord Justice Scott Baker at the Royal Court of Justice in 2007-8.

(visit the link for the full news article)

Not much really to comment on yet as it is just breaking but it looks like they are going to re-investigate what happened that night in Paris and they are going to look into possible 'conspiracy theories'

I dont think that they will reveil what really happened if they do get the information that proves that some of the conspiracy theories are saying.

This will be a very interesting news story to follow over the coming weeks or months.

news.sky.com
(visit the link for the full news article)

I wonder if they will give it a fair shake, though.

I read Mohabbat al Fayed's theories for a long time after the incident, and he raised so many questions, which seemed valid, that it made my head spin; and not the least of which "why the heck did it take so long to get her to the hospital? Since when can emergency workers not work on car crash victim in route to the hospital? Since never!

It will be interesting to see what turns up. Also when someone writes "If I die in a car crash, look to my husband", you MUST take heed.

More sources:-

ITV News:-

www.itv.com...

The Metropolitan Police have released the following statement regarding the new information it has received relating to the deatsh of Princess Diana and Dodi Al Fayed in 1997:

The deaths of Diana, Princess of Wales and Dodi Al Fayed were thoroughly investigated, and examined by an Inquest led by Lord Justice Scott Baker at the Royal Court of Justice in 2007-2008.

On 7 April 2008, the Jury concluded their verdict as "unlawful killing, grossly negligent driving of the following vehicles and of the Mercedes."

The Metropolitan Police Service is scoping information that has recently been received in relation to the deaths and assessing its relevance and credibility.

The assessment will be carried out by officers from the Specialist Crime and Operations Command.

This is not a re-investigation and does not come under Operation Paget.

– Metropolitan Police statement

More info on the above link.

I have a question? France already investigated this to death. Did they preserve and carefully index every piece of evidence available from the case so the British now have 100% of what the French did? Are all witnesses still alive, healthy and able to testify to the British inquiry?

....or did the Brits wait long enough to give the best "...but it's been SO long.." effort they can publicly put on before saying it was pretty much what France said it was anyway and no more to see here?

The length of time they waited to investigate the death of one of their own Royals isn't just odd, it's outright improper all the way around. Ouch... The British people must be real mixed on this one?

reply to post by wrabbit2000


Wrabbit, I don't know. But I hope they investigate it again and again, until they come up with some answers that are congruent with what we saw happen.

reply to post by jroduk




Just flashed back to 97.........

If a billionaire cant shed light on the conspiracy angle of it, no one can.

reply to post by BellaSabre


I'll agree if the investigations have the material to work with and the information to make the outcome meaningful.

Otherwise? GCHQ is making FAR bigger news there than they EVER want to, aren't they? Looking for damn near anything to fill headlines and news that bumps them OFF the pages I'll bet. This fits that bill as at leastr a big step in that direction...doesn't it?

The timing is just awesome to see after so many years of total silence and acceptance. Now? Of all times? One of the most media sensational stories is resurrected? Well, who said Americans are the only ones who can play the media like a finely tuned instrument?

reply to post by wrabbit2000


Long time lurker etc - think this may be my first post and Wrabbit dude I have a lot of respect for your comments and am kinda pleased you are onto this thread.

My spidey-senses were up as soon as this came on the news. My first instinct is disinformation especially after all this time, the clearly non-independent inquiry and the Keith Allen doc which was very quickly banned from the net - like why is this coming out now? Why is it being reported the way that it is - there was a very interesting choice of words used.

It is intriguing they are saying the info came from the RMP military police though... gives the story some legs...

Originally posted by wrabbit2000
reply to post by BellaSabre

 

I'll agree if the investigations have the material to work with and the information to make the outcome meaningful.

Otherwise? GCHQ is making FAR bigger news there than they EVER want to, aren't they? Looking for damn near anything to fill headlines and news that bumps them OFF the pages I'll bet. This fits that bill as at leastr a big step in that direction...doesn't it?

The timing is just awesome to see after so many years of total silence and acceptance. Now? Of all times? One of the most media sensational stories is resurrected? Well, who said Americans are the only ones who can play the media like a finely tuned instrument?

EXACTLY! - Why now and what info could they be wanting to steer us away from by getting us to think about this again...?

reply to post by EleniG


So now they are saying the allegation is she was killed by a member of the military.. .

This is all for naught.
Even discovering an inside job won't change the fact that she is dead.
RIP Diana.

reply to post by EleniG

Well, on the thought that maybe we're all just growing too cynical and hardened to the ways of the new world, it's free to hope, right? I can at least hope it's not as transparent and flimsy as timing may suggest and actually answers something. Hope...doesn't cost a thing.

(Of course, Hope stands behind it's rival, pragmatism...who usually wins out to be proven right, eh?)

Originally posted by wrabbit2000
reply to post by EleniG

 

Well, on the thought that maybe we're all just growing too cynical and hardened to the ways of the new world, it's free to hope, right? I can at least hope it's not as transparent and flimsy as timing may suggest and actually answers something. Hope...doesn't cost a thing.

(Of course, Hope stands behind it's rival, pragmatism...who usually wins out to be proven right, eh?)

Oh Wrabbit - such philosophical optimism, I wish I could share it but this is just too left field for me. But you are right, perhaps I should return to sitting on my fence practicing pragmatism, as the grounding force for any alternative thinker, while this story evolves... :-)

reply to post by jroduk


Funny enough, this documentary that was banned in the U.K. described the very idea that members of the British military/spy service were involved and that it was covered up. There's some very interesting info in this doc :up

reply to post by EleniG


Oh, I'd say it sounds like we're on the same page for all this. The post giving sentiments of RIP to Diana's memory is what really prompted a moment of pause and softening of my tone to remember..hey, maybe..JUST maybe there is something more than we can reasonably assume here? After all, it is a beautiful human being we're talking about in the end here and she died far too young in a way we'll likely never be entirely certain about circumstances for.

I sure hope her memory and name wouldn't be used in such a cheap way to offer distraction for the public. There is that cynicism again, eh? lol..... Cynicism or just being realistic though? I think that's the worst part. We've reached a point in both England and the US where the difference between the two can be too small to tell at times.

reply to post by Zcustosmorum


Interesting...

I have had a theory that it may have been a MI5/6 job due to her relationship with Dodi Fayed and the connections and implications it could create for the Royal family.

I think this might be like the Dr David Kelly enquiry. We will never really know the real truth.

reply to post by wrabbit2000

The British people must be real mixed on this one?

To be honest, not really.
Most of us are pretty much apathetic towards the Royal Family etc, as long as they don't interfere in our lives well who really cares what they do to each other?

Sure, there'd be an uproar if any conspiracy is ever proven but after the initial outrage things would quieten down and we'd more than likely slip back into 'same old same old'.

What might be of more importance would be the reaction of William and to a slightly lesser extent Harry.
What would they do if any inquiry shows Philip or Charles were some how complicit in their mother's 'murder' or even the suppression of facts relating to her death?

reply to post by Zcustosmorum


Yes thats it - The Keith Allen doc, very interesting indeed. But this was doing the rounds a year back and so a link to these revelations feels a little tenuous at this stage...

Originally posted by sonnny1
reply to post by jroduk

 

Just flashed back to 97.........

If a billionaire cant shed light on the conspiracy angle of it, no one can.

Yes they can. If they handle the investigation more carefully without prejudging the case and making themselves look prejudiced.