It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Pistoche
reply to post by queenofswords
I completely agree with you, but for argument's sake suppose that you go back in time and are presented with an opportunity to kill baby Hitler, would you take it or let the infant be? Assume that you know for certain he will carry out the same terrifying deeds of our world from the 1930s and 40s.
Originally posted by Grimpachi
Personally I am not a believer however lets just say God told you what would happen and gave you the choice. So the info is irrefutable.
Originally posted by TheomExperience
Originally posted by Grimpachi
Personally I am not a believer however lets just say God told you what would happen and gave you the choice. So the info is irrefutable.
This makes as much sense as a lesbian using a dildo.
Originally posted by tetra50
Look, we have PLENTY of evidence that our perceptions and events are preconceived and played out and outwardly influenced.....
Sorry, I find this an objectionable thread. When I commented this on a thread, yesterday, the OP just said turn the thread off like a TV channel, don't read.
Originally posted by Seektruthalways1
reply to post by SaturnFX
So if the person is going to kill someone and that is wrong, then how do we kill them is justified as right? ...
Your only changing who dies,
Originally posted by Grimpachi
Originally posted by TheomExperience
Originally posted by Grimpachi
Personally I am not a believer however lets just say God told you what would happen and gave you the choice. So the info is irrefutable.
This makes as much sense as a lesbian using a dildo.
Its an attempt to make others understand the exercise. It sets precidence for the authority of information given and that is all. Don't read into it.edit on 27-7-2013 by Grimpachi because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Unity_99
reply to post by Grimpachi
This is an absolute. There is zero wiggle room. The child is not a murderer.
Originally posted by SaturnFX
Originally posted by tetra50
Look, we have PLENTY of evidence that our perceptions and events are preconceived and played out and outwardly influenced.....
Sure, but that's not part of the discussion. this is fantasy thinking, but it does have relevant merit on society. Kill the baby before it grows up and becomes a threat.
pre-emptive strike on some nation before it becomes a threat
Stop a movement in its infancy before it becomes a threat
etc..this is a graphic question about something done a hundred times over that we accept as the norm. Its philosophy, it is a question of thinking and pondering in order to identfify parts of ourselves..not back out of thinking by simply waving your hands in the air and say its impossible, you refuse to think about the question posed.
The rest of your comment I removed due to it being sort of weird, all over the map, and not making sense..transhumanism, movements, etc etc etc...nothing to do with the thread...or like anything that comes to mind. But I will comment on one thing you may want to consider:
Sorry, I find this an objectionable thread. When I commented this on a thread, yesterday, the OP just said turn the thread off like a TV channel, don't read.
So yesterday you found and commented on a thread you found objectionable...today you found and commented on a thread you found objectionable.
Is it your hobby to find things and choose to be offended verses just move on?
We have a beach in florida..a nudist beach. you had to drive out basically in the middle of nowhere, park, then walk a couple miles by beach only in order to arrive there.
"familys" went there purposefully to get offended and call officials to get the beach shut down. Seems for the hundreds upon hundreds of miles of coastland in florida, they needed to hike to that specific spot to get offended. Lot of work trying to get offended...but probably more enjoyable to just stop at a nearby beach instead and not worry whats going on far away from you...or in your case, why not just pass over threads you will no doubt get offended by....Do what you want, but you might want to ask yourself..do you enjoy being offended? What do you get from it?
Originally posted by tetra50
YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT KILLING A HELPLESS INFANT AND ASSUMING YOU KNOW FOR SURE WHAT THAT INFANT WILL CAUSE IN THE FUTURE AS A JUSTIFICATION FOR KILLING A BABY.
Sorry,dude, I come down on this issue the same way every time. You don't really know. That's the point.
so, to me, your thread, requires a specific judgment not POSSIBLE, and in fact, what I joined a website like this to rail against the judgements of science and politics and society....to meet and answer your definitions and disseminations and judgements here....
No offfense. But this is how I see it/......How can you know?
Please, if you are going to comment, I have included lots of logic there. Concentrate on that, as you asked in your OP, not the emotion.
Originally posted by SubTruth
reply to post by SaturnFX
If it is the son of devil himself then I would be alright with it. Other then that murder is murder.