It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by milkyway12
reply to post by gosseyn
What this woman did was abandon her oath and the other mothers and fathers serving their country. Last I checked, you voluntarily sign your life over to Uncle Sam.
The sentence was justified.
What she should have done is to turn her self pity into pride. That she is protecting millions upon millions of baby girls. No, she abandoned her oath to protect the 310 million souls to the best of her ability.
I guess the children of this country didn't matter much, the ones she is protecting or rather was until just abandoned them.edit on 11-5-2013 by milkyway12 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ChuckNasty
reply to post by sean
She'll get all of the above.
She will also be an example to those who violate the UCMJ. No broken process here.... Hopefully the other gals will use the system to protect them instead of the internet.
The military justice system is night and day different than any civilian one.
But we all understand your feelings. Does seem like a waste of money.
Edit: It really is a waste of money. But discipline is the UCMJ ultimate goal.
edit on 12-5-2013 by ChuckNasty because: as above
Were these douche bags you speak of notified in Canada?? That's where this deserter was.
Justified my A## ! Ive seen soldiers refuse to deploy and were only given a dishonorable discharge & no jail time.
If you bothered to read the thread you'd know that her defense is a fabrication of her attorney. She never spoke out. This BS is just a way to get off the hook...but it didn't work too well.
This has more to do with her speaking out against the war machine and the politics of it then her insubordination obviously.
What service is a pregnant woman going to do in the military, other than secretary duties??
Yeah I did read, but that's just my opinion when it comes to the mind set of this unthinking machine called discipline.
Originally posted by seabag
reply to post by sean
What service is a pregnant woman going to do in the military, other than secretary duties??
Well, how about the service she signed up to do??
It's almost like you're making the case why women shouldn't serve in the military. After all, what good are they if they just run off and make babies?? That's what I gathered from your dismissive post.
Originally posted by sean
Well a pregnant woman is a pregnant woman. Yes they can still serve, but most likely are doing light duty jobs. The thing I was trying to imply or convey was that maybe she wasn't offered something of lighter duty and figured F'it and just went AWOL.
Originally posted by sean
Originally posted by ChuckNasty
reply to post by sean
She'll get all of the above.
She will also be an example to those who violate the UCMJ. No broken process here.... Hopefully the other gals will use the system to protect them instead of the internet.
The military justice system is night and day different than any civilian one.
But we all understand your feelings. Does seem like a waste of money.
Edit: It really is a waste of money. But discipline is the UCMJ ultimate goal.
edit on 12-5-2013 by ChuckNasty because: as above
What service is a pregnant woman going to do in the military, other than secretary duties??
Originally posted by FurvusRexCaeli
Originally posted by sean
Well a pregnant woman is a pregnant woman. Yes they can still serve, but most likely are doing light duty jobs. The thing I was trying to imply or convey was that maybe she wasn't offered something of lighter duty and figured F'it and just went AWOL.
She wasn't pregnant when she deserted. She is pregnant now, in 2013, when the story was written. She was not pregnant in 2007, when she took off for Canada.
Nor did she go AWOL. She deserted. She admitted it in court. "I intended to quit my job permanently." That's not AWOL, that's desertion.
That's her first step and sets all the wheels turning. I would not be surprised if the Chaplain said "See your CO for the form." What is the Chaplain's role in all this?
a. Military personnel who seek either discharge or assignment to noncombatant duties because of conscientious objection will submit an application on DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action) to their immediate commanding officer. Personnel will indicate whether they are seeking discharge or assignment to noncombatant duties.
Guides for the investigation?
a. The interviewing chaplain may be from any component of the Armed Forces but not assigned to an Active or Inactive Control Group.
(1) Before interviewing applicants, the chaplain will advise them that any communication between the applicant and the chaplain will not be privileged since a detailed report of the interview will become a part of the application for consideration in the adjudication process.
During the conduct of the entire investigation, the investigating officer should remember that—
a. A conscientious objector under this regulation is a person who is sincerely opposed, because of religious or deeply held moral or ethical (not political, philosophical, or sociological) beliefs, to participating in war in any form
In these extracts, I have deleted provisions relating to those who are willing to serve, but only in a non-combat position.
Conscientious objection
A firm, fixed and sincere objection to participation in war in any form or the bearing of arms, because of religious training and belief. Unless otherwise specified, the term “conscientious objector” includes both 1–0 and 1–A–0 conscientious objectors.
b. Class 1–0 conscientious objector. A member who, by reason of conscientious objection, sincerely objects to participation of any kind in war in any form.
Originally posted by milkyway12
reply to post by gosseyn
What this woman did was abandon her oath and the other mothers and fathers serving their country. Last I checked, you voluntarily sign your life over to Uncle Sam.
The sentence was justified.
What she should have done is to turn her self pity into pride. That she is protecting millions upon millions of baby girls. No, she abandoned her oath to protect the 310 million souls to the best of her ability.
I guess the children of this country didn't matter much, the ones she is protecting or rather was until just abandoned them.edit on 11-5-2013 by milkyway12 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by FurvusRexCaeli
Originally posted by sean
Well a pregnant woman is a pregnant woman. Yes they can still serve, but most likely are doing light duty jobs. The thing I was trying to imply or convey was that maybe she wasn't offered something of lighter duty and figured F'it and just went AWOL.
She wasn't pregnant when she deserted. She is pregnant now, in 2013, when the story was written. She was not pregnant in 2007, when she took off for Canada.
Nor did she go AWOL. She deserted. She admitted it in court. "I intended to quit my job permanently." That's not AWOL, that's desertion.
Originally posted by iwilliam
From the article linked in OP:
This so-called Christian chaplain could have advised her that there was a regulation, AR 600-43, that gave her the right to petition to be classified a conscientious objector. He chose not to do the Christian thing.
Since she was never advised of her rights as a conscientious objector, she believed that she had no options but to return to Iraq or to emigrate to Canada. Rivera and her husband and two children fled to Canada in February, 2007, settling in Toronto.
This chaplain should be stripped of his collar, if not his job. From the way this sounds, he was either being ignorant and negligent regarding his job, or otherwise he was knowingly trying to serve the military above serving god or his fellow man-- and for that reason IMO should be stripped of his religious position.