It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
27 Now you are the body of Christ, and each one of you is a part of it.
I matters to me personally what I want to put my energy into.
Why does it matter if one sees the Christ as mystical and another understands him through worldly knowledge?
It is my understanding that Grace is God's unconditional love.
I don't believe in a God who created the universe.
. . . God unconditionally loves his entire creation.
"Religion" in the New Testament means to perform acts of piety.
We have to let go of religion if we are to pursue Christ.
I don't believe in a "doctrine". Hell is in the New Testament, plus I know Hell from personal experience having died twice.
You have to separate yourself from that horrible hell doctrine that causes you to sit in judgment.
Originally posted by bb23108
reply to post by sacgamer25
The Grace of God is God's business. All one can do is prepare the body-mind through fully turning oneself to God in love. This gift of turning is indeed Grace that is given, even from the very beginning, and if one's responsive turning is true, then the Divine will likely gift one further with real spiritual embrace and transformation - but when or how is not one's rightful concern nor one's business, only surrender is.edit on 18-4-2013 by bb23108 because: (no reason given)
Thank you for your kind words. And thank you for bucket metaphor too.
Originally posted by mysticnoon
To me, this is one of the most profound posts I have read in these forums.
I believe every soul is constantly showered in Grace, but not necessarily receptive to this Grace.
If a bucket is placed upside down in the rain, it will never collect any water. So it is with our relationship to Grace. Unless we become receptive through turning the bucket of our soul towards the unending shower of Love and Grace, we will remain ignorant of this Love. But the paradox is, that it is only through Grace that we become receptive. So as bb23108, all we can hope to do is surrender, and even that is not in our hands...
Originally posted by sacgamer25
reply to post by vethumanbeing
You simply have to believe that even the misunderstanding came about for a universal purpose that is playing out each day. Any day could be the day of judgment for all of us. When one chooses to judge himself he can then learn to let go of judgment, but many refuse to accept this message. Capitalism is the exact opposite of judging oneself, since one becomes the only true self. In your pursuit you become disconnected from the body. You can't gain at the expense of others and expect to profit with spiritual gifts.
My now 8 year old daughter said to me the other day. I can see that poor people have more love than people with money. I said you know what baby I believe you are right, because they are not so loaded down with the anxiety that accompanies wealth.
I have met a wealthy man who was happy but his employees were also very happy. So you can know that they felt rewarded for their efforts according to what was right. I have met men with more wealth who are miserable because they refuse to stop pushing for the last penny. It is as though greed has consumed them, if no one intervenes they will die in their greed.
It is perplexing how the answer has always been right there. And although we may choose different language to understand it. It all points to love being the evolution of spirit, and the only remaining step in the evolution of mankind. Many seem to be "awake" if that is even a term, but what does it mean? Is it possible that we are ready to evolve as a whole body, or will only a few find the truth like before?
I was born optimistic so I'm hopping to witness the birth of the Messianic age, the age of love, the age of Aquarius, I don't care why you believe that an age of love could dominate, just believe and do it. What is the worst that can happen if we choose to love one another? Why does this not make since to everyone?
Originally posted by sacgamer25
reply to post by vethumanbeing
Interesting using math to prove love theory? I know we have brain science that can prove love theory, but math would be the final piece. If love could be proven as a theory of math than all would at least have to believe that love is real. So many accept such a poor substitute, why they don't spit it out at some point is quite confusing.
Originally posted by vethumanbeing
Originally posted by sacgamer25
reply to post by vethumanbeing
Interesting using math to prove love theory? I know we have brain science that can prove love theory, but math would be the final piece. If love could be proven as a theory of math than all would at least have to believe that love is real. So many accept such a poor substitute, why they don't spit it out at some point is quite confusing.
I really wonder why no one the best of mental/math minds have not tackled what is described (adnausem) in the popular culture nomenclature "LOVE" (the answer to all "all you need is love" factor). It is a force not an emotion. Everyone seems to shy from defining it (I KNOW IT HAS AN EQUATION JUST LIKE GRAVITY oops or not). Religous types tout it, where/why (not Galileo still imprisoned in a tower) are the Vaticans Mathmaticians at work on this 24-7. They are all astronomers working at the Vatican Observitory on Mt. Graham AZ LOOKING FOR GOD. Someone there must have some theoretical physics knowledge or algebreic fundimentals. Out of all of human brilliance, no one has attempted to solve the Love angle formulae OF FORCE expressed not proven.edit on 25-4-2013 by vethumanbeing because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by sacgamer25
Originally posted by vethumanbeing
Originally posted by sacgamer25
reply to post by vethumanbeing
Interesting using math to prove love theory? I know we have brain science that can prove love theory, but math would be the final piece. If love could be proven as a theory of math than all would at least have to believe that love is real. So many accept such a poor substitute, why they don't spit it out at some point is quite confusing.
I really wonder why no one the best of mental/math minds have not tackled what is described (adnausem) in the popular culture nomenclature "LOVE" (the answer to all "all you need is love" factor). It is a force not an emotion. Everyone seems to shy from defining it (I KNOW IT HAS AN EQUATION JUST LIKE GRAVITY oops or not). Religous types tout it, where/why (not Galileo still imprisoned in a tower) are the Vaticans Mathmaticians at work on this 24-7. They are all astronomers working at the Vatican Observitory on Mt. Graham AZ LOOKING FOR GOD. Someone there must have some theoretical physics knowledge or algebreic fundimentals. Out of all of human brilliance, no one has attempted to solve the Love angle formulae OF FORCE expressed not proven.edit on 25-4-2013 by vethumanbeing because: (no reason given)
I will give you this because I think it points to a creator. Einsteins therory of relativity to me proves a creator. It both predicts black holes but leaves science with the answer infinity. To me that is God saying everything you see had to be created at one time and if you don't believe me I left you a fingerprint to prove the concept of infinity. Science hates this. This is why the search for other possibilities. But even then if the equation works the black hole is still infinity or 0 which it obviously cannot be unless it too was created, simply to break the law. So that no one is blameless.