It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AmberLeaf
Most of the people on the streets were tourists according to the news.
The protests were happening but were avoided by the media to make out everyone loved the woman. Plenty of pictures on twitter of people holding signs against the woman, none made it onto the tv.
£18m for all this, maybe a bit more. Straight out of the taxpayers pocket, we wasnt asked, we were told we would be paying for it.
Democracy my arse
Originally posted by AmberLeaf
Most of the people on the streets were tourists according to the news.
The protests were happening but were avoided by the media to make out everyone loved the woman. Plenty of pictures on twitter of people holding signs against the woman, none made it onto the tv.
£18m for all this, maybe a bit more. Straight out of the taxpayers pocket, we wasnt asked, we were told we would be paying for it.
Democracy my arse
Originally posted by Flavian
reply to post by AmberLeaf
Just thought i would point out that most of the cost of the funeral is the Policing and that is where is bit of a debate arises as to the actual costs. These officers would have been on duty anyway, just on their normal patch instead of Policing the funeral. Therefore in terms of manpower there is actually little to no extra cost and that £18 million figure is vastly reduced.
Obviously, this means that those officers won't be on their normal patch though.
Originally posted by Flavian
reply to post by AmberLeaf
Just thought i would point out that most of the cost of the funeral is the Policing and that is where is bit of a debate arises as to the actual costs. These officers would have been on duty anyway, just on their normal patch instead of Policing the funeral. Therefore in terms of manpower there is actually little to no extra cost and that £18 million figure is vastly reduced.
Obviously, this means that those officers won't be on their normal patch though.
Originally posted by muzzleflash
Originally posted by Flavian
reply to post by AmberLeaf
Just thought i would point out that most of the cost of the funeral is the Policing and that is where is bit of a debate arises as to the actual costs. These officers would have been on duty anyway, just on their normal patch instead of Policing the funeral. Therefore in terms of manpower there is actually little to no extra cost and that £18 million figure is vastly reduced.
Obviously, this means that those officers won't be on their normal patch though.
Seems pretty pointless.
Imagine all of the better things they could have been assigned to do for the day...
Originally posted by Flavian
reply to post by yorkshireman
Police are being drafted in from around the country - it isn't just Police from London (so no, actually it is correct).
To be honest though, i was going to avoid any further Thatcher threads because objectivity goes out of the window on this site regarding Thatcher.edit on 17-4-2013 by Flavian because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ironorchid
I remember Princess Margaret's ( the Queens only sister ) cremation costing £280.00 - which included a £20.00 surcharge because she lived outside the borough ( Slough ).
It seems to me that The British public have been short-changed on this one.
As for the Queen attending, what on earth is she thinking? I thought that she was the monarch of all the UK, including the north of England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland - all of which suffered terribly under the Thatcher regime.
This is nothing but a Tory propaganda exercise and to my mind the Queen has no right to be involved.