It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Angelic Resurrection
Originally posted by swan001
[
Okay, thanks for the link. So they count using the caesium to resonance, not radioactivity. Thanks!
Lol. Wait till science grasps the distinction between chronometer time and ambient time
Originally posted by ImaFungi
www.space.com...
Fasten your seat belt.
One-quarter the size of a football field, Sunjammer will produce a whopping maximum thrust of approximately 0.01 newton, Barnes said — roughly equivalent to the weight of a sugar packet.
That's a little simplistic, and usually shown as a 2d representation of a 3d phenomenon. If that illustration helps others that's good, but I know enough of the math to see it in mathematical terms.
Originally posted by ImaFungi
Do you view gravity working as a physical well in space-time? like the dip in the fabric models?
If specific density is a property of salt being dissolved in salt-water, how do salt-water fish exist? Fish have water in them, don't they?
if dark energy is a uniform property of space, how do atoms exist? atoms have space in them dont they?
If I knew the answer to the cosmological constant question I'd be expecting a Nobel prize.
So spatial expansion is like; first there were 0 planck lengths, then there were 1, then 2, then 3, then 4, then 5, all the way up to the 100000x9999999999^999999^99999 there are today? and where do astronomers or physists predict this space comes from? and where was the cosmological constant stored?
See the link in his signature. The normal tomato has a pH pf 4.6. The other tomato subjected to anti-gravity time dilation in the time machine has a pH of 4.0.
Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
I wouldn't mind hearing an explanation of what you mean there.
Originally posted by Angelic Resurrection
Lol. Wait till science grasps the distinction between chronometer time and ambient time
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
That's a little simplistic, and usually shown as a 2d representation of a 3d phenomenon. If that illustration helps others that's good, but I know enough of the math to see it in mathematical terms.
if specific density is a property of salt being dissolved in salt-water, how do salt-water fish exist? Fish have water in them, don't they?
See the link in his signature.
Originally posted by ImaFungi
How do they think gravity works? How do you think gravity works?
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
Now if we could just make some good photon-powered engines to propel spacecraft. I know some people are trying.
Originally posted by ImaFungi
www.space.com...
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
Fasten your seat belt.
One-quarter the size of a football field, Sunjammer will produce a whopping maximum thrust of approximately 0.01 newton, Barnes said — roughly equivalent to the weight of a sugar packet.
Seriously though, I'm glad to see the technology being developed. But I was hoping for a little more thrust than the weight of a sugar packet.
That's not what my question implies at all. Fish do have water in them. They have other things too. Likewise atoms have space in them, but they have other things too. In no way does this imply that the "space in atoms does not have dark energy", but if it does, it's probably too small to measure, so it's probably a moot point, so I'm not sure why you even care. It's kind of like asking if the Earth moves toward a paper clip when you drop a paper clip. The math says it does, but good luck measuring it.
Originally posted by ImaFungi
You could have just said; even thought dark energy exists uniformly, and is an inherent quality of what space is, the space in atoms does not have dark energy.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
if specific density is a property of salt being dissolved in salt-water, how do salt-water fish exist? Fish have water in them, don't they?
Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
I wouldn't mind hearing an explanation of what you mean there.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
But apparently he won't release all the details of this technology except to those that license it. Did I get that about right, Angelic Resurrection?
All processes ( physical, chemical etc ) in this universe are essentially governed by anbient time.
How?
Lets take a light bulb and dilate the time of the filament.
Now apply same to your satellite clocks or to any phenomena in the universe, you care to choose. Now what happens to einstein's GR?
Originally posted by Phage
I give up. What happens?
Can you show the math?
edit on 3/7/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Angelic Resurrection
Originally posted by Phage
I give up. What happens?
Can you show the math?
edit on 3/7/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)
Just like your proffessor, I wont be spelling out everything for you.
Do it as your homework
The picture of the one normal tomato and one experimental tomato in your signature link is impressive, but my professor told be that a sample size of one per experimental subgroup was not satisfactory. So, if you really want to be like my professor, you might need a larger sample size than 1, to determine if you have a statistically significant effect. He was looking for at least 95% confidence and I think the CERN experimenters are looking for better than 5 sigma (standard deviations) to prove things like the Higgs boson. However I'm not sure what you'd measure on the tomato to give 95% confidence.
Originally posted by Angelic Resurrection
Just like your proffessor, I wont be spelling out everything for you.
Do it as your homework
I think buddhasystem is a particle physicist so he more qualified to answer particle physics questions...but I can tell you what I know.
Originally posted by swan001
Were there any direct observation of a quark in all history? Any picture?
Caption: Evidence for the top quark. Computer display of particle tracks which provide strong evidence for the existence of the top quark. Top quarks are created in proton-antiproton collisions along with top anti-quarks. A top decays almost instantly into a bottom quark and a W boson. The W then decays into a quark-lepton pair (eg an electron and neutrino). The magenta track has the highest momentum, and is a muon from a W decay. Green and yellow tracks are 'jets' from other quark decays. The red arrow indicates 'missing energy', normally due to one or more neutrinos. These tracks were detected by the D0 experiment at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, USA.
Originally posted by Angelic Resurrection
Originally posted by ImaFungi
How do they think gravity works? How do you think gravity works?
Lo Sir comedy, you are winding up every1 on here.
But I've answered yr ques elsewhere