It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by VariableConstant
reply to post by sajuek
You say the "government" would do all these things. Our government is mostly made up of rich old people who probably can't even shop for their own groceries. Desk types who do not have the ability to do anything you've described.
The military has the capabilities, but do you honestly think they would be dumping smallpox in the rivers they grew up fishing in? Setting off nukes in their home towns? Strafing convoys of civilians, including their own families? Absurd.edit on 24-2-2013 by VariableConstant because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by VariableConstant
reply to post by sajuek
The military has the capabilities, but do you honestly think they would be dumping smallpox in the rivers they grew up fishing in? Setting off nukes in their home towns? Strafing convoys of civilians, including their own families? Absurd.edit on 24-2-2013 by VariableConstant because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by inverslyproportional
reply to post by sajuek
Just so you know, your facts are way off, and you skewed the numbers to puff up your threads evidence factor, either to try and get a knee jerk reaction, or because you cant add, or your drinking your countries koolaid.
35 percent plus 65 percent equals 100 percent. I can assure you, from 35 years of firsthand personal experience, 100 percent of the populous is not fat. I for one am 5 foot 10 inches tall and 155 lbs. Scrawny by most standards, so are a lot of us, then you have your sick skinny types, a lot of these also, then your typical exercise nuts, a lot of them too. So you see, way less than 100 percent of the populous is fat and or overweight.
Originally posted by twoturtles
Hello.
I have thought of this scenario as well.
My take is that it would be a war of attrition. We WOULD win with numbers, over time.
Sure the Gov is a big beast, but its hungry. We could starve it. Both figuratively and literally.
We would be everywhere at once.
Look what the Afgans are able to do from a cave! Can you imagine
what I could do with my full shop, full of tools and gadgets and black-powder and what not.
Sure there isn't that many “fit for combat” people around, but even 1% of 250 million is a worrisome
number to try and kill off or control.
Also, look at our street gangs. They just need a logistical commander and they could be a force to be
reckoned with (ala Black Hawk Down), as well as the survivalists in the Rockies or in Idaho (ala Red
Dawn). They would come down out of the hills and try to gum up the Gov works.
I once had no hope for the civilians vs the jack boots, but I have more hope everyday as people start to
wake up, get informed and angry.
It can and will be won.
I just hope your not an American. We don’t need your defeatist attitude!
Originally posted by Druscilla
reply to post by sajuek
I'ts moronic drivel from people that have more guns than they have IQ points.
The same people will argue about all our soldiers getting killed in [insert name of foreign country here], but they want to have these same soldiers lined up in their crosshairs?
Any civil war on American soil would also result in a number of opportunist nations stepping in to "help".
Many a faction would even willfully invite said "help"; entirely ignorant of the cost such "help" would result in.
All in all, for the most part, it's loud mouthed morons that have self marginalized themselves because for whatever reason, they can't seem to live by the same laws that everyone else seems to be quite fine and okay with.
edit on 24-2-2013 by Druscilla because: (no reason given)
There is no chance that the .gov could take on 1 percent of the populous, that is 3 million folks on their own ground, fighting for their families, vs. Tyrants