It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Greasyphil420
Wow that is strange,forgive me if I'm being arrogant but has anyone thought it could just be a coincidence.you know those cloud things being in just the right location at the right time something like that.im no expert obviously but I don't like it when no one even mentions it could be a coincidence.
Is there anything out there that could make the sun look like this naturally?
Don't get me wrong i would love it to be some kind of stargate,but I like to think of natural possibilities before coming to quite a blown out conclusion.
Peace.
Originally posted by TauCetixeta
Here is your solution.
The ETs do not break the laws of physics. They just find a way around them.
When the antimatter reactor is online, the mass of the spacecraft is reduced to an
artificial zero. Go ahead and plug zero into Force = Mass X Acceleration .
You require new formulas.
The solution is to simply .....cheat.
Originally posted by NeoVain
Originally posted by TauCetixeta
reply to post by signalfire
The big black triangles are always the same size.
There is a singularity at the center of our G2V sun.
Our sun is a rim star.
Excuse me but what is a rim star? Link pls.
Originally posted by slowisfast
Originally posted by MysterX
reply to post by Chamberf=6
Course it should be questioned.
Everything should be questioned, even established theories...which is what the OP is doing.
Since you seem to agree with questioning theories too...it's surprising you seem so snide in your tone.
Or perhaps you feel mainstream theories shouldn't be questioned?
Questioning mainstream theories and making out of this world(literally) claims are two, decidedly different, things. The OP has stated, as fact, that he knows the intimate details of interstellar travel as well as the navigation and ships required to do so, among other things. Questioning how he came into this information is not only reasonable but to not, would be intellectually dishonest. Chamberf=6 has done nothing but be straight forward and direct in their questioning and in no way has been bullying or trolling. Reading through this thread objectively, I have to question why the OP won't answer such simple questions directly? It's, in every way, relevant to this thread.
Originally posted by eriktheawful
Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
reply to post by eriktheawful
What do you think about this "triangle" being visible in only the UV wavelengths? AIA 4500 looks normal, not unexpectedly.
I think it's only visible in certain frequencies taken by SDO because of what these "holes" are. Which is:
A Coronal Hole.
Now people on here want to speculate that it's a stargate/wormhole......meh.
I'd ask what the sun thinks of that? I mean they are suggesting that the sun is suddenly having a huge hole (take a look at that thing) that is more of a physical hole than a magnetic hole (in other words, it looks black because it's cooler in temp then the surrounding areas).
A real hole of that size.......mean that we would see this on all frequencies of the spectrum (it would suddenly get a lot darker here on the earth), and that you'd be interfering with the sun's fusion reactions going on.
The sun plays a balance game: it's constantly trying to explode, but the sheer mass of it is keeping it from doing that.
Now, suddenly open up a real hole that size and you'll upset that balance......in favor for the exploding side......
But of course people can speculate.
I just wish that when they start making statements about star ships, and shields, etc, etc, etc, like it's FACT that they would actually cite their source (since we are in the Space Exploration forum....NOT the Skunk Works).
Originally posted by fourthmeal
reply to post by Chamberf=6
With all due respect, I think he knows you are trolling him and attempting to discredit him, and he's ignoring you. You've brought the same thing up again and again, and his silence is the answer though it isn't the one you seek.
I recommend that you just accept that you and him are not going to harmonize on this, and by him ignoring you it keeps the thread on-topic and avoids T&C violations of ATS. Afterall, if you're attempting to get him to answer you on the basis of using his answer as a strawman, well, that would be ill-advised.
Just one observer's opinion, no harm meant either way.
Originally posted by excalibrate
Anyone ,try to find a pic of the sun triangle from before?? to compare the images side by side?? just wondering
Originally posted by TauCetixeta
Originally posted by fourthmeal
reply to post by Chamberf=6
With all due respect, I think he knows you are trolling him and attempting to discredit him, and he's ignoring you. You've brought the same thing up again and again, and his silence is the answer though it isn't the one you seek.
I recommend that you just accept that you and him are not going to harmonize on this, and by him ignoring you it keeps the thread on-topic and avoids T&C violations of ATS. Afterall, if you're attempting to get him to answer you on the basis of using his answer as a strawman, well, that would be ill-advised.
Just one observer's opinion, no harm meant either way.
Bingo! We have a winner!
I think he is just doing his job. No offense taken.
We should mainly concentrate on that big black triangle on our sun and the new book
from Art Campbell.