So a bunch of child killing war criminals are saying they are going to take your guns? interesting

I wonder what people are going to do? I also wonder if people have forgotten that the President is responsible for war crimes in Libya, Pakistan and now Syria?

Cant believe people are going to just lay down thier arms to tyrants.

reply to post by TheMindWar


I really don't like Obama, in fact I hate the guy and i think he's running this country into the ground but saying he's responsible for war crimes like killing children is a bit much. Where did you get this information?
Anywho, can't take my guns; Second amendment and all.
An armed man is a citizen, a disarmed man is a subject.

reply to post by CrisMajor


Err what?! A bit much, lol?!

Hold on, hasnt the whitehouse and Obama himself ordered the killing of 179 children in pakistan? Answer yes!

Has obama agreed to clean up the DU in Iraq which has polluted Iraq for the next 4.5 BILLION years and is causing the deaths and deformity of thousands of children?!?! No he hasnt!

I am sorry but if I went out and ordered the killing 179 children I would be called a monster! He is called "person of the year! "

reply to post by TheMindWar


[CITATION NEEDED]

But yeah, man of the year my ass.

Originally posted by CrisMajor
reply to post by TheMindWar

 

[CITATION NEEDED]

But yeah, man of the year my ass.

168 children killed in pakistan. (The actual figure i have heard is 179)
www.telegraph.co.uk...


Obama Orders drone strikes in Pakistan...
mobile.reuters.com...

Originally posted by CrisMajor
reply to post by TheMindWar

 

[CITATION NEEDED]

But yeah, man of the year my ass.

No, in the Time magazine world he is quite appropriately person of the year, because the Time person of the year is the person that "for better or for worse, ...has done the most to influence the events of the year." Hitler has been person of the year, it's not necessarily a good thing.

reply to post by TheMindWar


Holy #. I'm really surprised I haven't heard about this. #in drones cause too much collateral damage.

I would imagine any president or any leader for that matter being responsible for any deaths that occur from his orders. That said, it probably applies to every one of them. So, what's the beef? can you not be content with just one weapon for self defense, instead of a whole fecking arsenal.

Originally posted by TheMindWar
reply to post by CrisMajor

 

Err what?! A bit much, lol?!

Hold on, hasnt the whitehouse and Obama himself ordered the killing of 179 children in pakistan? Answer yes!

Has obama agreed to clean up the DU in Iraq which has polluted Iraq for the next 4.5 BILLION years and is causing the deaths and deformity of thousands of children?!?! No he hasnt!

I am sorry but if I went out and ordered the killing 179 children I would be called a monster! He is called "person of the year! "

edit on 19-12-2012 by TheMindWar because: Typo

I thought Stockholm Syndrome had been redefined when hearing BHO had
been bestowed the Nobel Peace Prize, for having done nothing but being by
that time "a community organizer".. somewhat odd since it's by definition
creating unrest and division.
Then he REALLY got out there and UNearned the sucker. Stunning.
Now this, I'm sorry but if the APA is now calling the majority of Americans
mentally ill for mistrusting the government judge the bush by its berries.