It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Flow101
I would start with banning assault rifles and other powerful guns, there's NO reason to have these type of guns available to the public.
Originally posted by Alfie1
Originally posted by Boomer1941
reply to post by OtherSideOfTheCoin
So how did you celebrate your rising crime rate in Britain when they gave up their guns???
Crime rates are falling in the UK :-
www.guardian.co.uk...
Originally posted by FluffyCannibal
Don't ban guns. Enforce stricter gun control.
Or, get used to madmen running around shooting everybody.
And to all the people hiding behind their right to bear arms - if somebody close to you ever gets killed in a massacre, don't go looking to others for sympathy. YOU have the power to do something about it, but are choosing not to.
Originally posted by tysondenon
Someone early on in the thread said that the Connecticut already has an assault rifle ban, so gun reform is a moot point. What I'd like to know is, how is a gun like the .233 Bushmaster not considered an assault rifle? Why was that gun legal? It seems like such an excessively powerful gun, relative to, say, a small, concealable handgun.
Originally posted by FluffyCannibal
And to all the people hiding behind their right to bear arms - if somebody close to you ever gets killed in a massacre, don't go looking to others for sympathy. YOU have the power to do something about it, but are choosing not to.
Originally posted by FluffyCannibal
And to all the people hiding behind their right to bear arms - if somebody close to you ever gets killed in a massacre, don't go looking to others for sympathy. YOU have the power to do something about it, but are choosing not to.
Originally posted by OtherSideOfTheCoin
Stop hiding behind that ancient bit of paper, your constitution, you all need to grow a set and sort out your gun problem before you have anoter 18 dead kids, who knows next time it could be one of yours, I pray it is not and i pray for the families of those affected
Originally posted by FluffyCannibal
The fact of the matter is, less guns means less gun crimes.
Originally posted by FluffyCannibal
reply to post by rock427
1) By your reasoning, there should be the same levels of gun crime in every first world country, regardless of their gun control. There isn't.
2) It SHOULD be harder to get a gun. If ordinary law-abiding people can't go out of their way to make their home a safer one then that's their problem.
The fact of the matter is, less guns means less gun crimes.
Originally posted by FluffyCannibal
1) By your reasoning, there should be the same levels of gun crime in every first world country, regardless of their gun control. There isn't.
2) It SHOULD be harder to get a gun. If ordinary law-abiding people can't go out of their way to make their home a safer one then that's their problem.
The fact of the matter is, less guns means less gun crimes.
Originally posted by EvillerBob
So your second argument is that it's the victims fault? Intriguing.
Edited to ask: what do you mean by "it should be harder"? If you meanit should be harder to obtain illegal firearms then I would absolutely agree. If you mean it should be harder to legally obtain a firearm then I disagree, as very few firearms offences are committed by people who are licensed to possess them.
I would also agree that there have been some notable failings in the licensing system - for instance, the attacker at Dunblane was already known to be a danger and his licence had already been revoked on those grounds at least once, the reasons why he successfully appealed are still rather... murky.
Originally posted by FluffyCannibal
reply to post by vor78
I understand and accept your point, but something has to be done to stop crazy people getting hold of guns. The simplest form of this is to limit the number of guns, basic maths. And the overall statistics speak for themselves - America has little gun control compared to alot of other countries, but alot more gun crime. Even if the number of homicides is dropping (although that could be irrelevant - it's the number of gun-related homicides that count).
Originally posted by DeathShield
Very Rarely will i respond to threads of this nature But let's get something clear here. Banning Guns in the UK did not put an end to gun related crimes. Last year gun crimes ROSE by 35% in the UK. Source: www.dailymail.co.uk...