It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
Instability in Egypt, where a newly-elected Islamic government teeters over an angry population, isn't enough to stop the U.S. from sending more than 20 F-16 fighter jets, as part of a $1 billion foreign aid package.
The first four jets are to be delivered to Egypt beginning Jan. 22, a source at the naval air base in Fort Worth, where the planes have been undergoing testing, told FoxNews.com. T
“The Obama administration wants to simply throw money at an Egyptian government that the president cannot even clearly state is an ally of the United States,” Rep. Ros-Lehtinen said.
The $213 million order, which is paid for by U.S. taxpayers and is part of Egypt's foreign aid package from America, had to be approved by lawmakers in Washington.While the basic F-16 has been a military workhorse for top air forces for more than 25 years, the cockpit electronics are constantly updated and the models Egypt is getting are the best defense contractor Lockheed Martin makes.
"This is a great day for Lockheed Martin and a testament to the enduring partnership and commitment we have made to the government of Egypt," said John Larson, vice president, Lockheed Martin F-16 programs. "We remain committed to providing our customer with a proven, advanced 4th Generation multirole fighter."
t was a meeting that not long ago would have seemed totally implausible. But Egypt's newly elected president, the Muslim Brotherhood's candidate, has warmly welcomed America's top diplomat to Cairo for talks - and heard her affirmation of Washington's "strong support" for the change that had brought him to power.
For years the Islamist organisation, outlawed in Egypt under the regime of former president Hosni Mubarak, had been demonised by successive American administrations; while the Brotherhood regarded the US with suspicion, as an ally of repressive regimes across the Middle East.
On Saturday, however, President Mohammed Morsi declared to Hilary Clinton, US Secretary of State: "We are very, very keen to meet you and happy you are here," and heard in return her promise of "the strong support of the United States for the Egyptian people and their democratic transition".
Originally posted by Montana
IDK, the military seems to be the one stabilizing force in Egypt right now. I don't see a problem with completing an order placed a long time ago to them.
Originally posted by AnonymousCitizen
I am not sure what I am more angry about, the fact that the Muslim Brotherhood is receiving 20 brand new F-16s, or the fact that they are a gift from the U.S. taxpayer.
Originally posted by AnonymousCitizen
Did you miss that part about it being paid for by the U.S. taxpayer? (serious question)
Originally posted by Montana
Originally posted by AnonymousCitizen
I am not sure what I am more angry about, the fact that the Muslim Brotherhood is receiving 20 brand new F-16s, or the fact that they are a gift from the U.S. taxpayer.
The Muslim Brotherhood is not receiving the fighters, the military is. Those two aren't exactly best buddies right now.
The Egyptian military hierarchy is often described as hostile to the Brothers, but that case is frequently overstated. What the Egyptian military wants is the ability to conduct its own affairs without civilian meddling, and to continue to expand a sprawling business empire that ranges from refrigerator factories to water-bottling plants to high-end condominium development. Mubarak provided that platform until he fell. Now, if the Muslim Brotherhood is offering a similar deal, who are Egypt's officers to complain?
There have been plenty of efforts to induce the military to cooperate. While two years ago Brotherhood leaders would talk about the baleful role the military played in Egyptian political life and bitterly complain about US backing for the army, the draft constitution includes protections of the military's long-established perks that seem the result of a remarkable detente between the Muslim Brotherhood and the officers. ...
The second sentence of the preamble to the draft hails the military's support for the January 25 revolution – a remarkable piece of historical revisionism for the beginning of a document that's supposed to undergird the building of a democratic political culture in the country. Article 197 of the draft takes control of the military's budget out of the hands of the legislature, and Article 198 says "civilians shall not stand trial before military courts except for crimes that harm the armed forces." That caveat is big enough to drive a truck through.
Having claimed vast new powers, designed to ram through a constitutional draft by referendum next week, Morsi is now officially promising to use the military to enforce the vote, despite huge protests from an anti–Muslim Brotherhood coalition. Paranoically blaming “foreigners” for the protests, Morsi has deployed the military’s tanks around his office, adding: “It is my duty to defend the homeland.” Morsi and the government-controlled newspaper Al Ahram used precisely the same language as the generals did in pledging to protect Egypt’s “institutions.”
Originally posted by Montana
Originally posted by AnonymousCitizen
Did you miss that part about it being paid for by the U.S. taxpayer? (serious question)
I saw it, and again this is nothing new or even the slightest bit unusual. This is exactly the way US foreign 'aid' usually works. Instead of sending money we send weapons. You didn't know this?
Originally posted by jibeho
Morsi just granted the military the power to arrest civilians during the current referendum process. It was just back in August when Morsi stripped the military of many of its authorities.
There are far greater forces at play.
Originally posted by HomerinNC
Yeah, let's give weapons to the enemy, or possibly soon to be an enemy to use against us.
Haven't we learned anything?
Iraq? Bin Laden?
Originally posted by MystikMushroom
reply to post by AnonymousCitizen
It's from Breibartt ... that's like Fox News on steroids.
F-16's ... meh. The newer F-22's and the joint strike fighter could take those out any day. Let's not forget the "black budget" aircraft that we the public don't even know about.
The Pentagon wouldn't allow this if those 20 F-16's posed any kind of real threat to our own flyboys.
Aircraft now being produced for Turkey, Pakistan, Morocco and Egypt are the Advanced Block 50/52 F-16C/D configuration. The United Arab Emirates was the launch customer for the block 60 F-16 E/F version, and is the platform basis for the proposed variant called the F-16IN Super Viper for the Indian Air Force’s Medium Multi-role Combat Aircraft competition.
McHenry said the F-16 offers the latest technologies and capabilities available today – including AESA radar, day-night, all-weather, standoff, autonomous, air intercept and precision strike. These aircraft have the latest in avionics, sensors and weapons, plus user-friendly cockpits and systems integration that provide pilots with high situational awareness.
Originally posted by jibeho
Originally posted by HomerinNC
Yeah, let's give weapons to the enemy, or possibly soon to be an enemy to use against us.
Haven't we learned anything?
Iraq? Bin Laden?
They could easily turn these brand new, equipped with the latest and greatest, F-16's against Israel. Egypt is no longer a friend of Israel.
Originally posted by Montana
IDK, the military seems to be the one stabilizing force in Egypt right now. I don't see a problem with completing an order placed a long time ago to them.