It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Merriman Weir
Originally posted by Ismail
Why are we still voting then ?
You don't have to be genius to understand that economic imperatives always trump the well being of the public, and left wing as right wing governements alike are subjected to the same economic constraints. Why then are we so surprised when parties change but policies don't ?
If you have an economic system were mathematically, a few will end up being rich, and if being rich is being powerfull, and if the powerfull write the laws as they always have, then why is it not self-evident that the circle cannot be broken by reform or new laws. While this economic system stands, nothing will ever change.
So again, why do we continue to validate a system that doesn't work by giving it our vote ? And why aren't we adressing the motivation behind governement policy for what it is : economics ?edit on 28-11-2012 by Ismail because: (no reason given)
Largely because, despite internet heroics, most people don't really have the stomach for the realities of a revolution. Also, it's easy to question the legitimacy of revolutions.
Voting and democracy is still a useful tool but we're not using it properly. With enough people, it's possible to change the nature of parties. For example, if enough people became party members, there'd be enough internal pressure to drag New Labour back to being a left wing party who would go against the economic paradigms of the last 30 years. A reinstating and implementation of Clause IV in Labour's constitution would be a massive changer and create a new/old system.
I do appreciate what you're saying though, I make a similar argument regarding foreign aid. It's basically exporting a broken political/economic model to countries that would be better off without the strings that come with 'development' aid.
Originally posted by Unity_99
They want their serfdom back, they want us all to be impoverished slaves working THEIR land, but its illegal basic and intrinsic illegality that we are not fully entitled and co-sharing this earth without the crown ownership and the realtors to begin with.
Anytime we don't notice bad trends, and pay attention, we are selling our children out. And quite frankly compared to the mug shots on the royal families, the bankers and the leaders, our children are angels and beauteous and beloved beyond compare. So what is the deal???? Why are people so unable to reach across the board and ensure all people are equal, the poor cared for, and democracies interactive and responsive?
We're creating our future here, both in the world, and spiritually.
What happened instead, was, people got greedy. Instead of properties staying affordable and maintaining value, everyone wanted to have them sell at profit. That it meant their own children couldn't save a down payment and afford a house, and their own grandchildren couldn't have a backyard garden and pets most of the time, and live normal lives, DID NOT STAND IN THE WAY OF GREED.
You see, this takeover happened with a payoff, to the then current homeowner.edit on 28-11-2012 by Unity_99 because: (no reason given)
Your threads makes no sense, you are not a prisoner you just have to work to live like everyone else so stop moaning. It’s called capitalism if you don’t like it why don’t you go try out North Korea and see how it goes
reply to post by michael1983l
the ousting of the old boys club in Westminister and the return of people making decisions for the greater good of all Citizens instead of that of the few wealthy ones.
Nigel Farage is the only current politician that I could vote for but what we really need is a revolution, the ousting of the old boys club in Westminister
and the return of people making decisions for the greater good of all Citizens instead of that of the few wealthy ones.
Originally posted by michael1983l
reply to post by Ismail
The question is how do we change the Game. By creating a political party with the right ideas or by bringing down the system completely and building it a fresh. Either way it will be a difficult road.
Originally posted by nerbot
Originally posted by michael1983l
reply to post by Ismail
The question is how do we change the Game. By creating a political party with the right ideas or by bringing down the system completely and building it a fresh. Either way it will be a difficult road.
The game must be changed by educating the players.
The same people who would complain about the costs of living probably fill their lives with unnecessary things and thus believe, because they have no money left, that they are hard done by.
In reality, the players have no concept of descerning needs from wants and that is what causes these kind of problems.
I have no sympathy for those who struggle with living or accomodation if they have such a non existant grasp on what is REALLY important in life. The same people who may have a new phone or laptop, car or foreign holiday.
If you don't have the money for it in your pocket, don't buy it or borrow.
Originally posted by QQXXw
Originally posted by nerbot
Originally posted by michael1983l
reply to post by Ismail
The question is how do we change the Game. By creating a political party with the right ideas or by bringing down the system completely and building it a fresh. Either way it will be a difficult road.
The game must be changed by educating the players.
You are making a massive mistake my friend, in assuming that the blame lies with the consumer, not the system.
Originally posted by michael1983l
I'm afraid to say that it has finally dawned on me, that I am a prisoner in my own country.
Now lets look at the statistics which back up my sentiments
Originally posted by michael1983l
I'm afraid to say that it has finally dawned on me, that I am a prisoner in my own country. I do not have metal bars on my windows and I have the key to my door but I am still a prisoner inside this country they call the UK. Equality has ended and it has been replaced with modern day slavery. Let me take a few moments to explain how this can be. It all starts with social engineering by the government, first they started out by saying that we can all own our own home (Thatcher in the late 70s), so the sheeple being the sheeple all start buying up their council houses. Then the Government de-regulates the Mortgage lenders and they start lending to people at 100% or even 110% mortgage, flooding the market with new buyers, who in the long term could not really afford what they were doing. House prices shoot up, pricing nearly all first time buyers off the market and then the rug gets pulled.
The financial system collapses and house prices bottom out, leaving those who have bought their house in negative equity. Repossesions soar and now the housing market is flooded with people needing to rent, because of the lack of mortgage's available and the price of housing compared to wage. All the houses that are now being repossesed is being bought up by the wealthy at rock bottom prices with a view to rent to the plebs at all time high rental prices. So now us plebs can't afford to buy nor can we afford to rent.
Now lets look at the statistics which back up my sentiments
Average house price
£249,958
House type Average price
Detached £343,105
Semi-detached £209,098
Terrace £209,808
Flat £245,533
Average House Rentqal Per Month
£707 per month
Average Wage
£24,228 which equals £19,007 a year after taxation or £1584 per callender month.
This means that the average house will cost 13.15 times the average take home pay.
The average rental price per month will take up over 50% of your take home pay when council tax is taken into consideration.
We are all financial prisoners and slaves to this country's elite.
Originally posted by Wide-Eyes
reply to post by michael1983l
Excellent truth here. However, I would just like to point something out that I think needs addressing.
Repossesions soar and now the housing market is flooded with people needing to rent, because of the lack of mortgage's available and the price of housing compared to wage. All the houses that are now being repossesed is being bought up by the wealthy at rock bottom prices with a view to rent to the plebs at all time high rental prices.
From what I can tell, the banks/mortgage lenders, aren't actually letting these properties out or selling them. They are sitting on them, waiting for the cost of housing to increase. They want to make the highest possible raise on these reposessed properties.
They are biding their time.edit on 27-11-2012 by Wide-Eyes because: to clarify