It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ubeenhad
reply to post by PurpleChiten
Re-read my original post. I think we are now in agreement.
Originally posted by PurpleChiten
Acceleration can be caused by gravity, but gravity cannot be caused by acceleration
Originally posted by ubeenhad
reply to post by PurpleChiten
Your using a very rudimentary argument, im not sure how to proceed. I feel I've made my point to an acceptable degree.
simplistic interpretation of the equivalence principle is that “gravitation is acceleration.”
-Dr. Robert Heaston
Originally posted by wildespace
reply to post by PurpleChiten
Acceleration is dependent on motion, but motion is relative. If you're in a sealed blind spaceship travelling at a uniform speed, and then it starts to deccelerate, it will feel like you started accelerating in the opposite direction.
Acceleration is measured in g's. 1g is the acceleration we experience when standing on Earth.
Originally posted by beezzer
If a photon has no mass and falls into a black hole due to the curvature of space-time, then is there anything than can puncture space-time and simply travel in a straight line regardless of outside influence?
Originally posted by PurpleChiten
reply to post by ubeenhad
But the issue is, acceleration isn't dependent upon mass at all. It would have to be exactly as you stated, a closed system at a constant acceleration to mimic gravity on behalf of the observer. If the room were to stop accelerating, the effect would be lost. However, since gravity is based upon mass and the distance from that mass, it isn't going to change due to the lack of movement, it only changes if the mass or the distance changes.
Therefore, acceleration and gravity are not the same thing at all. Acceleration can mimic gravity in a controlled environment for a given experiment, but they are not the same.
Originally posted by ubeenhad
Imagine you are in a sealed room. The room could be sitting motionless on a space ship. The space ship could have a soundless, vibration-less rocket that we cannot tell if it is firing or not. If it is firing it is accelerating the room at 9.8 m/s^2. Is there any experiment that we can do that will allow you to figure out if the room is sitting on the earth or accelerating through space at 9.8 m/s^2? NO, there is no possible experiment we can do to tell the difference, so then there is no difference. Gravity is not a force but acceleration that manifests itself as a warping (curving) of Space-Time.*
*(Hence the issue with the standard model and quantum mechanics)
ANYONE I know who has taken any undergraduate level class that covers relativity would trace the path of Einstein. And he DISCOVERED relativity with a similar thought experiment. So everyone gets told acceleration is the same as gravity. Its just something we say, all the time.
"Acceleration doesn't cause gravity"
For all intensive purposes, im sorry. It does.
edit on 3-11-2012 by ubeenhad because: (no reason given)edit on 3-11-2012 by ubeenhad because: (no reason given)edit on 3-11-2012 by ubeenhad because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by chr0naut
Originally posted by ubeenhad
Imagine you are in a sealed room. The room could be sitting motionless on a space ship. The space ship could have a soundless, vibration-less rocket that we cannot tell if it is firing or not. If it is firing it is accelerating the room at 9.8 m/s^2. Is there any experiment that we can do that will allow you to figure out if the room is sitting on the earth or accelerating through space at 9.8 m/s^2? NO, there is no possible experiment we can do to tell the difference, so then there is no difference. Gravity is not a force but acceleration that manifests itself as a warping (curving) of Space-Time.*
*(Hence the issue with the standard model and quantum mechanics)
ANYONE I know who has taken any undergraduate level class that covers relativity would trace the path of Einstein. And he DISCOVERED relativity with a similar thought experiment. So everyone gets told acceleration is the same as gravity. Its just something we say, all the time.
"Acceleration doesn't cause gravity"
For all intensive purposes, im sorry. It does.
edit on 3-11-2012 by ubeenhad because: (no reason given)edit on 3-11-2012 by ubeenhad because: (no reason given)edit on 3-11-2012 by ubeenhad because: (no reason given)
I believe what Einstein proposed in his "Elevator" thought experiment was that the force created by acceleration was indistinguishable from the force created by gravity to an observer with no other frame of reference but themselves (ie: enclosed in an elevator).
This does not equate to acceleration and gravity being the same thing.
Originally posted by chr0naut
This does not equate to acceleration and gravity being the same thing.
Originally posted by ubeenhad
Originally posted by chr0naut
This does not equate to acceleration and gravity being the same thing.
I've already made the point of inertial reference frames.
If you read the topic, I refuted the same claim in a simpler manor.
Here it is again. Your being overly facetious.
Originally posted by PurpleChiten
reply to post by ImaFungi
Yes, it would still have gravity. It's a result of it's mass, not a result of it's motion.
Originally posted by ubeenhad
Acceleration is the same as gravity. So, speeding up gives you mass. Any object, no matter how big/small experiences this. You guys are arguing over semantics. Photons have no rest mass. Thats the answer. To go any deeper requires a much longer explanation than can be given on a forum.
Originally posted by ubeenhad
More semantics.
The effects of gravity is indistinguishable from the effects of acceleration.