It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by 3chainz
^ lol owned
Originally posted by Jobeycool
Why do people ignore Obamas record of terrible job with the economy and the Libya fiasco?
CNN poll of debate watchers: Who did debate make you more likely to vote for? Obama 24%, Romney 25%, Neither 50%.
Originally posted by Axial Leader
I have really enjoyed this thread tonight. I believe I have read every single post. This was especially appreciated tonight because my Dish TV receiver went out, and I had to listen to the debate on radio, so some of the color commentary here (usually filled in by the talking heads on TV) was nicely supplied by you folks. Well done! There are a lot of brilliant people on ATS, for sure.
Here is the thing -- you may think this is extremely shallow -- but I plan to vote as follows:
There will be one more job report coming out November 2nd. Purely and simply, if this job report shows a continued decline in the unemployment rate, I will be voting for Obama. If the unemployment rate stays the same or goes up, I will be voting for Romney. That is the way things will break for me.
I know you may think this is crazy, but in the absence of any other material facts -- with nothing to operate with except self-serving opinions, almost all of it speculation -- this job report will be the major determining factor for me. There is a certain undeniable epistemology to making a decision this way.
www.nytimes.com...
I think there are millions of people who agree with me on this. It will be hard to vote for Obama if this next jobs report does not show even a little improvement. Likewise, it it looks good, a lot of people will be willing to stay the course, no doubt. And I think it will be difficult to impossible to manipulate this report in any substantial way. I hope.
Have a nice evening, and thanks for all the deep thoughts.
Regards.
Originally posted by LiberLegit
So is there coherent discussion in this topic or just general cheerleading? Looks like the latter. You've ruined it again ATS...abort thread...
"You mean the Eighties... when America was growing by leaps and bounds, after another Democrat-induced Recession, and financial crisis?
Originally posted by snarky412
Originally posted by LiberLegit
So is there coherent discussion in this topic or just general cheerleading? Looks like the latter. You've ruined it again ATS...abort thread...
Actually, there are a few posters debating and discussing the differences between the 2 candidates.
But yeah, for the most part, those who are for Obama, well they said he did better.
Those for Romney say he did better.
Me, I was too busy reading all the comments!!!
The MSM will be showing the debate over and over all week long....ugh.
Dissecting and analyzing every little remark & quirk.....
Originally posted by campanionator
Originally posted by jam321
Obama is stalking like an eagle ready to pounce on its prey.
This is Obama's game, set, match.
Ya, he plays down his skill in that regard.
I'd hate to play poker with him
Originally posted by rnaa
reply to post by Signals
"You mean the Eighties... when America was growing by leaps and bounds, after another Democrat-induced Recession, and financial crisis?
No, I think he means the Eighties when Voodoo Economics DOUBLED America's debt against the GDP.
The mild, short lived recession caused by austerity measures imposed to close the Viet Nam War deficit was over by the time Reagan took office in 1981.
Reagan's voodoo strategy policies, and Reagan's voodoo strategy policies alone caused the recession of the early 1980's, and he had to abandon them to get out of it - and doubled the debt from 30% of GDP to 60% of GDP in the process.
The highest rate for a single month is shared by November and December of 1982 with an unemployment rate of 10.8%
The year with the highest average unemployment rate was 1982 with an average unemployment rate of 9.71%
Originally posted by Echo3Foxtrot
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
We train with bayonets. Don't use them in combat. I believe it has been classified as inhumane or something and the use of them is banned by the Geneva convention rules or guidelines or whatever they are. However, some units still issue them as a sidearm of sorts.
I have to say this debate was entertaining.
Originally posted by timetothink
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
And we used horses in Afghanistan.
Our commander in chief has no clue about the military.
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by sheepslayer247
Well, at least your vote is not going to give another one to Obama.
Well, fascism is leftism, something you have yet to figure out. Obama is a Nanny Stater which is what fascism is. Mussolini even coined the term "Totalitarianism".
Have you not noticed this admin increasingly telling us how to live our lives? Too much transfat, not enough veggies, blah blah blah! Hitler was a vegetarian and an animal rights activist too, as I understand it.
Originally posted by snarky412
Originally posted by Jobeycool
Why do people ignore Obamas record of terrible job with the economy and the Libya fiasco?
Do you ever get the feeling that you're being ignored?!
People who believe in him will never see it that way.
Personally, I don't believe the economy is doing as good as the White House wants us to think.
And his handling of foreign affairs is shameful IMO. He makes us look weak.
Originally posted by Vitruvian
DRUDGE POLL TAKEN MINUTE X MINUTE
GUESS WHAT O-Barma fan - antics?
edit on 23-10-2012 by Vitruvian because: text
Originally posted by FlyersFan
I put it at another tie.
But Obama's 'horses and bayonets' comment really ticked me off. I hope all of the US miltiary were listening as well as everyone in the ship building states of Virginia, Maine and Connecticut. He dustbin'd the Navy as a thing of the past. That was what was under that comment of his.