It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by sugarcookie1
If you look very closely at the upper right corner of the scoop. It has fallen off and fallen to the ground just below...The scoop looks chipped to me..Just a thought..peace,sugarcookie1
Originally posted by Phage
Originally posted by dcmb1409
Anyone notice the scoop has what appears to be a chipped edge.
No.
Originally posted by sugarcookie1
I just read what the op posted not all the replies so i didn't see what Phage posted.. But it still doesn't make him 100% right..peace,sugarcookie
Originally posted by Char-Lee
That is the interesting thing to me. I see detail, small things, but unlike the same type of photo I take at home, their is a fuzzy quality so that if you enlarge any object it is unseeable.
Originally posted by Char-Lee
Why do we have photos here on ATS where member has found that the picture is clearly make up of rocks that are repeated in different areas of the photos.
Clearly we are often given faked stuff from Nasa the proof is overwhelming!
Also how do you KNOW it was not released by someone who wants to let the public in and is being now handled by someone else?
Originally posted by Char-Lee
Why do we have photos here on ATS where member has found that the picture is clearly make up of rocks that are repeated in different areas of the photos. Clearly we are often given faked stuff from Nasa the proof is overwhelming!
Originally posted by JediMindTrek
In my opinion rocks can take very strange forms, especially with periodic dust storms. Though to me, it looks like a seahorse or a more amphibian based life form that's closely related to the fish family. This is strictly keeping in mind that these are carbon based life forms. Silicon, Hydrogen, etc. based life forms are not that farfetched.
Originally posted by Jeremiah65
reply to post by crawdad1914
They did. I downloaded a pic and put it here. The "anomaly" is a tiny little speck in the bottom middle of the pic...hard to see.
Originally posted by Char-Lee
yes like this "rock"
Originally posted by Char-Lee
it is strange how different it looks in this picture then the other one.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Originally posted by Blaine91555
Come on folks, the condom joke has played out. Please keep it on topic.
Sorry Blaine, I know I'm one of the culprits here... But you agree that it's hard to resist...
One the other hand, try to move a distance away from this discussion... I think that calling it a "shrimp" is just as silly.
Originally posted by mahatche
I don't get why the idea of NASA lying about life on mars is so popular here. If NASA found evidence for life on mars that would be a lot of enthusiasm for their projects, and with that enthusiasm means more money to fund those projects. For the scientists involved it's also their spot in the history books for a moment that changes everything we thought we knew about the universe.
If NASA wants to hide the truth of life on mars, they could simply keep the images from the public and we'd never know. There is no need for them to show them, tell us "this is unusual" then try to cover it up. that makes no sense.
Originally posted by unb3k44n7
It's a vauge image. But what got me was the suction-like "mouth" the object appeared to have. Pretty sure parts of the rover, at any given time, would not be mistaken to sport that feature.
Originally posted by ArMaP
Originally posted by Char-Lee
Why do we have photos here on ATS where member has found that the picture is clearly make up of rocks that are repeated in different areas of the photos.
Are you talking about the panoramas? Those are made with several photos and some repetition of the joining parts of the photos is common.
Clearly we are often given faked stuff from Nasa the proof is overwhelming!
Some proof of that would be nice.
Also how do you KNOW it was not released by someone who wants to let the public in and is being now handled by someone else?
I find that a very silly excuse.
If NASA is filtering what reaches the public, do you think that it's just one person doing it? That doesn't even happen in small companies, much less in larger organisations. Even if one of the persons that first look at the photos (I suppose those would be the scientists and technicians working on the team), do you think that only one person is responsible for what is and what is not published? And after that stage, do you think that the photos would be published without a second (or third) check?
That would only happen if they weren't worried about something leaking out, if they are they surely have several filtering layers.
Originally posted by ArMaP
Originally posted by Char-Lee
yes like this "rock"
That looks like three different rocks.
Originally posted by SheopleNation
Actually, it makes perfect sense my friend. Finding life or any Alien object would shatter the control that the masters of puppets have on the brainwashed foolish mortals who still believe in some 2000 year old fairy tale, which = keeps large populations of various sheople nations that they rule at bay and still easily herded. It's also about preventing global panic, which threatens their chain of power just as well.
Listen, We have Black Space Projects, that is a fact. I know that you mean well my friend, but all one has to do is continue to be open minded about these subjects. Best wishes. ~$heopleNation