It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by silent thunder
I think there is still great value in a vote for Paul. It is clear to all at this point that Paul has zero chance of taking the election in 2012, yet if enough people cast their votes for him, it sends a strong signal to the Republican party leadership that they need to start taking Paul's version of conservatism seriously and backing away from the neocon coolaide.
Think long-term, beyond merely the "lesser of two evils" for this election cycle, and think about influencing the longer-term conservative ideological DNA. Vote Ron Paul, even if it is "hopeless" in terms of a 2012 victory.
Originally posted by silent thunder
Think long-term, beyond merely the "lesser of two evils" for this election cycle, and think about influencing the longer-term conservative ideological DNA. Vote Ron Paul, even if it is "hopeless" in terms of a 2012 victory.
Originally posted by RealSpoke
Because there is not enough RP supporters for it to make a difference
Originally posted by Rockpuck
reply to post by Praetorius
To which the lesson is: Americans are incredibly ignorant, gullible, stupid creatures. They pick the side that the TV tells them to. It's not about politics, about ideologies, about who would run the country better. It's about representing your team, or when standing in the booth picking the person who first comes to mind because some political ad or something a pundit said stuck in your worthless mind.
Originally posted by Rockpuck
reply to post by Doalrite
Because while it does steal a vote that would likely go towards the Republican they also detest, hate, and most important fear the ideologies of Ron Paul. He's to dangerous to push.
You're also assuming the media actually distinguishes between parties.. really doesn't .. the Liberal Media hates the right fringe, they love Neocons, and Romney's a Neocon. To them one or the other really doesn't matter, they'll bash on whoever wins either way to detract our attention from the real details.
Originally posted by DaTroof
That's like asking why McDonald's doesn't spend money advertising the Wendy's across the street from Burger King. Sure, Paul will steal votes from Romney (unless the internet Paulites chicken out) but it's still in the Democrat's interest to just keep promoting Obama. Paul will already take a handful of votes from Obama, no need to risk increasing that total.
Originally posted by Doalrite
So I got railroaded in my last thread, I guess I put too much into it.
What I would like to know is if a vote for paul is really a vote for obama and Ron Paul is splitting the republican vote, how come CNN, Msnbc, and all the other left winged media... why aren't they pushing Ron Paul.
Why aren't they showing the corruption in the republican conventions and focusing on Mittens corruption and disregard of the rules and laws.
It comes back to the fact that there isn't a Republican or Democrat party in the top ranks of either, there is only the Establishment and they don't care who wins between Romney or Obama, because they have selected both to run.
This whole election is a scam, it doesn't matter if Romey or obama wins because we will still have government controlled health care and still be in mulitple wars, and still be crapping on the constitution.
here is a link to my last thread with more info:Ron Paul vs Establishment
edit on 10-8-2012 by Doalrite because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Domo1
Because he is absolutely no threat and outside of the internet isnt taken seriously. Ive warmed up to Paul lately but be realistic. If he ran against Obama he would lose by an insane margin. You do make an interesting point OP and I like where youre head is at but there is no way Paul could contend against Obama.