It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I'm not for banning people from owning guns, because the 2nd amendment prohibits that. I actually think that everyone should be allowed to own at least 1 hand gun or a shotgun for home/personal defense, the 2nd amendment gives us the right to bear arms.
I would like to see more background checks, and an actual mental evaluation whenever someone applies for a FFA.
Originally posted by muse7
So implementing more rules on who can get their hands on DEADLY devices is bad?
Only in America.....
Originally posted by projectvxn
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
"Gun Deaths" is a slanted statistic that doesn't take self defense into account. It groups lawful use of firearms with criminal uses.
That is no way to conduct a study on the effectiveness of gun control.
Statistics show that areas with loose gun laws have fewer attacks.
Originally posted by VeritasAequitas
reply to post by rnaa
Actually, I believe it's either Sweden or Switzerland that requires every home to have an automatic assault rifle. The crime rates as such are considerably low. See the bad guys have the upper hand because they don't care about gun permits, and etc. They will carry regardless. The good people who want to abide by the law are forced to go through so much more to get the same thing, and as such are often discouraged from doing so. When everybody is on equal playing field, it's not the same. Going into a house in that country for any kind of robbery, you know already what they have inside is no joke. This is discouraging in itself. Nobody wants to die for a few grand. They want quick easy money. Car theft must be quite rampant, I suspect.edit on 5-8-2012 by VeritasAequitas because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
Statistics show that pretty much every country in the world that has gun laws also has much lower incidents of gun related crime.
An armed society is a dangerous society - especially an american armed society.
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
Arm everyone. Add weapons training to middle school curriculum. Statistics show that areas with loose gun laws have fewer attacks. An armed society is a polite society.
Statistics show that pretty much every country in the world that has gun laws also has much lower incidents of gun related crime.
my home country of New Zealand apparently has about 1.1 million firearms for a population of 4.5 million - so it can hardly be said to be "unarmed". Australia has about 20 million people and somewhere between 2.5 and 5 million guns (estimates/survey results vary/are argued about)
An armed society is a dangerous society - especially an american armed society.edit on 5-8-2012 by Aloysius the Gaul because: (no reason given)
Actually, I believe it's either Sweden or Switzerland that requires every home to have an automatic assault rifle. The crime rates as such are considerably low.
Originally posted by muse7
So implementing more rules on who can get their hands on DEADLY devices is bad?
Only in America.....
Originally posted by grey580
reply to post by Domo1
This one is easy.
Require everyone to carry a gun.
If everyone is armed this sort of thing won't happen.
An armed society is a polite one.