It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
From the link
Aerial photos over al Qaim in northwestern Iraq have revealed a cluster of long, hangar-like structures with large steel doors some 12-14 meters high and 15-20 meters wide, the size of sheds housing heavy fire trucks. In frequent passes overhead, spy satellites and reconnaissance aircraft have picked up surface indications of the hidden presence of nuclear, chemical or biological materials. They have not ruled out al Hussein surface to surface missiles being held ready there to deliver unconventional warheads. Some of the Scuds fired against Israel in 1991 were launched here. Signs of chemical emissions have been detected in the deep canyons riddling the Al Qaim region, most of them concealed from overhead view by overhanging cliffs. More impenetrable hiding places are to be found along the Euphrates river banks, which are densely overgrown thanks to the rapids splashing down from the mountains.
Coalition forces have refrained from going straight in to Al Qaim to establish once and for all what weapons are hidden there for several reasons. Its installations are the most heavily guarded in Iraq � more even than Saddam Hussein�s own bunker fortresses in Tikrit. The brigade of especially trained, crack Special Republican Guards loyalists guarding al Qaim have proved impervious to tempting coalition offers to surrender, preferring to defend the site with their lives. The coalition command has tried limited air and ground assault, including even what is termed �unconventional warfare direct-action missions�, but until this weekend made little progress.
Unlike other parts of Iraq, where resistance quickly melted away, the defenders of al Qaim have put up a professional, tenacious and dedicated fight. Military sources told DEBKAfile that had coalition forces confronted this quality of combat in the rest of Iraq, they would still be pinned down at Nasiriya in the south after three weeks of fighting.
Originally posted by Cypher
To say that these trucks don�t indicate a mobile weapons capability doesn�t take into account all of the other evidence presented.
The fact is that the intelligence that Colin Powell presented to the U.N. was gained from multiple sources, including an Iraqi defector who told them outright that the trucks were mobile bio-weapons production facilities. Later when the US and allies invaded Iraq, they did indeed find trucks that were configured almost exactly as their source had informed them they were.
Again, the former Iraqi government, the same government who lied time and after time about their WMD capabilities and missile technologies after the 1991 Gulf War, stated that the trucks were used to generate hydrogen for artillery weather balloons. However, as I showed in a previous post, commercial grade transportable Hydrogen production units are commercially available, and are much more efficient. There would have been no need for Iraq to produce their own
in 2002, and was of such a nature that the Iraqi�s were required to report it to the UN under the Security Council Resolutions. It was not. If it was not intended for bio-weapons manufacturing, what reason would the Iraqi�s have for denying its existence?
Although the amount of circumstantial evidence indicates that Saddam intended on at least keeping his ability to make them at a later date. Now whether or not that justifies the invasion�well that debate is for another time and another thread.
I never said that one proves the other. My point is that the entire invasion is one big spin-fest.
Originally posted by Cypher
Those sure are pretty pictures. However, your link to a debkafile.com article and the discussion thereof, in no way indicates that the evidence of Mobile labs is �spin�.
I disagree. Israeli spin and US spin is pretty much the same.
The debkafile is a pro-Israeli news site that has ties to, and employees some former, Mossad agents, and while they do occasionally have some very insightful analysis on Middle East they are in no way, shape or form spokespeople for the US or the coalition.
Oooo...that's convenient. I wonder where they went, those slippery WMDs?
Further, the Iraqi�s did indeed declare the Al-Qaim site and even let UN weapons inspectors into the site 3 times since 2002. Thus one must assume that if the site was used for WMD production the evidence had been removed long ago.
How could you "restart production" if you "didn't have WMDs" in the first place??
Second, the supposition is that if Saddam didn't have WMDs then he at least wanted to retain the capability to rapidly re-start production of the banned weapons. The idea that he would create mobile production trucks is perfectly in line with that assessment.
I wasn't aware of this technical issue regarding the degradation factor, so thank you. But please explain how an underground facility with the agents also placed in munitions on-site could be seen by a satellite.
And one last item, biological weapons degrade fairly rapidly. Thus it is very desirable to be able to produce them at the site where they are to be placed into the munitions. The truck as configured would have allowed for bio-agents to be produced on site, and then immediately placed into artillery shells, missiles etc. A fixed site cannot be moved with fluid battle lines, and despite your assertion CANNOT be hidden from satellites.
These reasons and the ones I gave before ALL point to the assertion that this trailer was almost assuredly originally intended for bio-weapons production.
Originally posted by edsinger
Well this sure as hell is a porta potty cleaner! Look at the pictures!
Maybe Collen Powel was right about the mobile labs?
A trailer found by the U.S. in Northern Iraq last year likely was used by Saddam Hussein's regime as a mobile biological weapons laboratory, and not to fill hydrogen balloons as some in Britain and the U.S. have charged, a view supported by exclusive photos obtained by WorldNetDaily that for the first time offer inside views of the trailer components.
worldnetdaily.com...
Originally posted by MaskedAvatar
Weather balloon station.
In the wrong hands, this could lead to poor meteorological forecasting.
Why are the diehards supporting the mythical WMDs when the "leaders" they fawn over are desperately trying to bury their blunders and stupidity and focus on other lies instead?