It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by FreeFromTheHerd
Originally posted by underduck
Yes. I have debating with people on whether or not they need to pay taxes.
If this failed and your state ended up supporting the act would you be all for it then?
Fortunately I live in a state where common sense is the rule, not the exception.
There is no constitutional authorization for a "social safety net", or the idea of redistributing wealth from those that have earned it, to those who have not.
If this failed, and my home state ended up implementing something like this, I would simply take my family, and my 2 businesses and relocate to a state that recognizes the idea that it is not the obligation of one to care for another.
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
Originally posted by The Sword
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
The right wing has been telling people that over and over.
Now they have to eat crow.
I wonder if any of them will come out and say "I was wrong...it is Constitutional".
Or more likely...they will just say they know the Constitution better than the SCOTUS.
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
I wonder if any of them will come out and say "I was wrong...it is Constitutional".
Or more likely...they will just say they know the Constitution better than the SCOTUS.
Originally posted by BearTruth
Where it can stand as a tax is, they require that everyone purchase insurance if not provided by their employer or Medicaid, however, you may decline to purchase the insurance. They will then slap you with a 1% tax on your income. Voila! It is a tax (which Congress is allowed to levy).
Originally posted by TheRedneck
As I am understanding this, it can be upheld if it is a tax, which pretty much means insurance will have to be administered through taxation itself instead of requiring individuals to buy private insurance. The law is constitutional if re-written in that manner, unconstitutional if requiring individuals to purchase their own insurance.
Confusing, but that's what I get.
TheRedneck
Originally posted by BearTruth
Originally posted by Rockpuck
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
From my understanding it's not "will stand" but if it were written as a tax it "could stand"? Currently forcing us to buy a corporate product isn't a tax... unless we wanted to take our little hint at Fascism and just have an all out Fascist blowout here?
Where it can stand as a tax is, they require that everyone purchase insurance if not provided by their employer or Medicaid, however, you may decline to purchase the insurance. They will then slap you with a 1% tax on your income. Voila! It is a tax (which Congress is allowed to levy).
Originally posted by Ben81
I have a few questions :
What does that mean .. is there something new with the today decision ?
will it mean everyone will have a new tax to pay for the Obama Health Plan ?
except the military and federal employees
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
HUGE victory for Obama.
Originally posted by Char-Lee
Originally posted by TheRedneck
As I am understanding this, it can be upheld if it is a tax, which pretty much means insurance will have to be administered through taxation itself instead of requiring individuals to buy private insurance. The law is constitutional if re-written in that manner, unconstitutional if requiring individuals to purchase their own insurance.
Confusing, but that's what I get.
TheRedneck
What the news discussion I watched this morning said, is that individuals will be required to buy insurance, but if they don't they will be fined. The fine will be called a tax and that makes it legal.
What I don't understand is how people who have always wanted insurance, but cannot afford it, can hardly pay their electric bills and eat, will suddenly be able to buy insurance just because a law ordered it.
When vehicle insurance became required in many states, at the high price it runs in ours, many seniors and poor had to give up their cars because they could not afford insurance. Many have to beg rides or use a bike or I have seen elderly carry heavy bags from the grocery stores.
So when they can't afford this health insurance wham they will be taxed, by a fine.
What I am also wondering about is the effect on small businesses, who will be required to insure their workers, many are barely making it already.
Originally posted by Char-Lee
What I don't understand is how people who have always wanted insurance, but cannot afford it, can hardly pay their electric bills and eat, will suddenly be able to buy insurance just because a law ordered it.
Originally posted by Rockpuck
Now CNN is saying 100% upheld under the Taxation Claus.
This is complete BS.. again kicking myself for voting for Democrats in 2008. Never again.
Question though.. if Health Insurance is now considered a "Tax" .. then that means I can write off all of my health insurance expenses when doing my taxes?
And I hope Obama plans on taking responsibility for the largest tax increase in US history. I'll have to pay $600 more a month in "taxes" for health insurance or pay a fee to the IRS.edit on 6/28/2012 by Rockpuck because: (no reason given)
There's always the chance that they actually know what they want and this bill isn't it.
So there is a chance that the people will just be more PO'ed.