It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Regardless of whether you're a Republican or a Democrat, if you are concerned about events on the Korean Peninsula, you had to come away from the first presidential debate feeling quite distressed. Neither US President George W Bush nor Senator John Kerry had his facts straight and, collectively, they managed to significantly reduce the already slim chance that there would be any near-term progress in the currently stalled six-party talks process.
By repeatedly pledging that his administration would not discuss the problem one-on-one with the North because "it's precisely what Kim Jong-il wants", the president has once again undercut the credibility of his own negotiators while seemingly putting his personal disdain for North Korea's leader ahead of the pursuit of America's national security interests.
The 1994 US - North Korea "Agreed Framework" (signed October 1994) provided that Pyongyang would "freeze" and later dismantle its nuclear facilities in return for being supplied with proliferation-proof nuclear reactors. � The US (and South Korea and Japan) went slow on starting reactor construction (now abandoned).
Originally posted by marg6043
We are up to our necks in Afghanistan and Iraq, how is NK affair is going to be handle.
Originally posted by Gools
The report of the mushroom cloud explosion was dismissed as a nuclear test and the administration still refuses to deal directly with NK. It seems the US WANTS NK to have nukes and are purposely driving them towards nuclear development.
Originally posted by marg6043
I don't get it if North Korea is known to be a big thread how come US and the UN has not done something more than just empty threads to them?
Originally posted by deevee
Also they don't have oil
Originally posted by marg6043
Originally posted by deevee
Also they don't have oil
Well they are claiming that they do, so if is true, then what is going on?
www.kimsoft.com...
www.gasandoil.com...
They claim many many funny things. If they had oil they wouldn't need to sell methamphetamine in the west to raise foreign exchange.
www.globalpublicmedia.com...
TexNorth Korea was found to have been producing 2.2 mm barrels of crude oil annually since 1999, a South Korean government official has reported. According to a high-ranking official, North Korea succeeded in experimental production of the crude oil from the seas off Sukchun in North Korea's South Pyongan Province in 1998 and has been producing oil since then. t
As hopes fade for a speedy resolution of the crisis over North Korea's nuclear-weapons program, there have been indications that South Korea and Japan - Pyongyang's principal enemies in the region - might themselves have been or might be considering embarking on the road to nuclear weapons, or at least giving thought to the option, and not for the first time. While the short-term threat stems from North Korea's nuclear weapons, over the longer term both South Korea and Japan are increasingly pursuing a path of "strategic independence" from their principal security guarantor of the past 60 years, the United States.
...
If both nations possessed nuclear weapons, that arguably would defuse the North Korean nuclear crisis, as well as change the geostrategic landscape of North Asia.
Regardless of what Washington and Beijing want, and even though it is not yet inevitable, the chances that South Korea and/or Japan might go nuclear in coming years has risen substantially of late. While the US is busy fighting a global "war on terrorism", it may find that the emergence of a nuclear Northeast Asia - and the emergence of independent new powers in South Korea and Japan - does more to undermine its global hegemony than the ongoing insurgency in Iraq and the Afghanistan-Pakistan border regions. Emphasis mine.