It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
So, it looks like it's official, which makes me sad. ATS, what are your opinions on this matter?
The main question I have, why continue to seek delegates, when you are pretty much removing yourself from the nomination. Would someone be able to clarify if I am misunderstanding this?
Does this remove any chance of him becoming President?
but in reality, the media is helping Ron Paul by lulling to sleep the Romney supporters, who now will forget to show up at state conventions because they think it's all a wrap.
Originally posted by 4hero
The BBC never really cover RP, but all of a sudden decide to cover this story. They didn't paint a great picture of him either, this is some of what they wrote...
"The 76-year-old, a former obstetrician-gynaecologist, has a small base of staunch supporters and enjoys popularity among many younger voters.
In the 2012 election campaign, Mr Paul was consistently ranked in the middle of the pack, neither rising to challenge Mr Romney's front-runner status nor trailing at the bottom of opinion polls.
But he was viewed by the Republican establishment as a candidate outside party orthodoxy, and he did not manage to win a single primary election".
Also this: "Mr Paul has 104 delegates, behind Mitt Romney's 966, with 1,144 delegates needed to secure the nomination".
It shouldn't take tens of millions to win this campaign, it should be a no-brainer for the masses, but when all the MSN are part of the fraud it does not help RP's campaign.
Originally posted by detachedindividual
It seems like there are a lot of anti-Paul people here trying to turn this into something it isn't. I guess they like to spin things like this to give people the impression that the person they dislike is out.
So what part of this are you idiots not reading properly, perhaps someone who can actually understand English can draw you a picture to better explain it to you?
Paul is not wasting money on pointless campaigning, he is still gaining support to influence the party. I can understand this, why is it so hard for so many idiots on ATS to comprehend this VERY CLEAR STATEMENT OF FACT?
Originally posted by ipsedixit
reply to post by itsmethegoat
Ya got me there.
When I wrote the post originally I was going by the tabulated poll results listed on the webpage from November of 2011 to the present, not from the graphic. Paul was still averaging 15% support.
When I uploaded the graphic I noticed that the table started from January of 2011 and so edited my post to reflect that. I never saw the 2008 reference until you pointed it out.
I'm guessing that 2008 was a date that was somehow left on the template for the graph for some reason. It must have some significance. I can't imagine it simply being an oversight.
Maybe they simply continued to track various personalities from the earlier campaign, running the same program to create the graph since 2008.edit on 15-5-2012 by ipsedixit because: (no reason given)
I'm guessing that 2008 was a date that was somehow left on the template for the graph for some reason. It must have some significance. I can't imagine it simply being an oversight.
Originally posted by AntiNWO
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
Originally posted by AntiNWO
Originally posted by dron020
Ron Paul supporters should now unite with the OWS
Yeah sure, we should all join the Obama lovefest...
Only united can we take down the Banking Cartel.
I'm all for that, but according to OWS "taking down the banking cartel" apparently means socialism, which is what TPTB are already working towards. No thanks.
If you really knew anything about politics you would not be making such absurd comments.
You have no idea what socialism, communism, capitalism are. It is just the McCarthy propaganda you remember. Or you are really, really, really wealthy and I don't have to call you a moron. Which is it?
So you admit to being a socialist, or is it Communist? Good for you, and good luck with that.
And sorry buddy, but I know about politics all too well. I am too young to remember McCarthyism and old enough to have lived through the Cold War. I had a friend who defected from the Soviet Union, I had friends from other Communist countries also, and I learned more from them over the years than you can imagine, so don't pretend to know what I know.
Communism and Socialism by their very nature create an elitist minority that holds down the majority financially, socially, and intellectually. It's rife with abuses that would make Wall Street envious. Capitalism, even with all it's flaws, is still the best system we have. It encourages competition and innovation which is directly responsible for all the fancy gadgets that you depend on every day. There is no incentive to produce, let alone innovate in Socialism or Communism. If you knew anything about politics you'd know that. Why should you produce when everything you need will be provided by the government no matter what? Why should you innovate when any reward you reap will be taken by the government? The reality is that without the Capitalist system our technology would be stuck in the 1920's.
The bottom line is this: If you want Socialism, sit back, relax, and do nothing. Thanks to Obama we're halfway there and he and Romney are both working to achieve the same end.edit on 5/15/2012 by AntiNWO because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by detachedindividual
It seems like there are a lot of anti-Paul people here trying to turn this into something it isn't. I guess they like to spin things like this to give people the impression that the person they dislike is out.
So what part of this are you idiots not reading properly, perhaps someone who can actually understand English can draw you a picture to better explain it to you?
Paul is not wasting money on pointless campaigning, he is still gaining support to influence the party. I can understand this, why is it so hard for so many idiots on ATS to comprehend this VERY CLEAR STATEMENT OF FACT?
Originally posted by Gazrok
We can still vote for WHOMEVER we wish as President. Many people forget that. Whether he's the Republican candidate, or even actively running, we can still vote for [Paul].
Unfortunately, barring something very unforeseen, our delegate total will not be strong enough to win the nomination. Governor Romney is now within 200 delegates of securing the party’s nod. However, our delegates can still make a major impact at the National Convention and beyond.
All delegates will be able to vote on party rules and allow us to shape the process for future liberty candidates.
Originally posted by PaxVeritas
I encourage all Ron Paul supporters to push like never before now.
Delegate level, volunteering, convention level, primary registration, etc.
We're up against big money with Obumber and Mittens.
Donate what you can and give your time when you can.
No mercy, no heads down, no defeat.
Originally posted by Nite_wing
Ok. Let me try to get this straight…
Santorum- quit spending money- suspended his campaign.
Bachman- quit spending money- suspended her campaign
Gingrich- quit spending money- suspended his campaign.
Paul- quit spending money…still hoping?
Originally posted by Nite_wing
Ok. Let me try to get this straight…
Santorum- quit spending money- suspended his campaign.
Bachman- quit spending money- suspended her campaign
Gingrich- quit spending money- suspended his campaign.
Paul- quit spending money…still hoping?
Originally posted by Eurisko2012
reply to post by usernameconspiracy
Check the polling data.
Everyone is falling in line with Romney.
Originally posted by usernameconspiracy
Originally posted by Eurisko2012
reply to post by usernameconspiracy
Check the polling data.
Everyone is falling in line with Romney.
As would be expected. I'm not sure why, when Ron Paul and his campaign staff have already made it perfectly clear that their goal at this point is to get a prime speaking spot at the convention, his supporters fail to accept even his own words regarding his campaign.