Calling all Moon Hoaxers Hubble is staring at the Moon!

reply to post by sparrowstail


Sorry.....your "example" video has been discredited, already....the "voice" of narration told me it was a video done by a "current" ATS member (at time of this post)....and, well.....shall I just say.....that video is full of "CR$%#P".

OK?

It belongs in another thread, where it can be more properly "debated".....

If I can find it, I will find the link....to that "other" thread (unless, someone else can find it before I do?!?)

Originally posted by ProudBird
reply to post by sparrowstail

 

Sorry.....your "example" video has been discredited, already....the "voice" of narration told me it was a video done by a "current" ATS member (at time of this post)....and, well.....shall I just say.....that video is full of "CR$%#P".

OK?

It belongs in another thread, where it can be more properly "debated".....

If I can find it, I will find the link....to that "other" thread (unless, someone else can find it before I do?!?)

edit on Wed 9 May 2012 by ProudBird because: (no reason given)

Thats just one of many videos showing Tom foolery. I suppose Karl's testimony has been discredited too?

I thought I'd just pop into this slanging fest to remind everyone that Hubble will not be taking pictures of the Moon; it will be taking highly sensitive spectrograms of the sunlight reflected off the lunar surface in order to analyze Venus' atmosphere. Ciao.

reply to post by DJW001


Ciao, Bello....."DJW".....

....ciao, bello!

(Kindest regards....in English....so few are left here, lately!)

reply to post by pianopraze


I, too, was thinking I had read that somewhere, that they previously stated that Hubble couldn't be used to view the moon.

reply to post by epsilon69


Why always grayscale pictures like this one of Tycho?
Is hubble able to shoot color pictures?

Originally posted by epsilon69


This could be just what we need to prove/disprove the Apollo moon landings. If Hubble is watching the moon very closely and carefully for hours, we can check to see if the Apollo landing sites are actually there!

Personally I have my doubts that we actually went to the moon. What makes me question the validity of Apollo was the radiation problem, i never had to rely on the photographic evidence.

But now if NASA releases these images, considering they are going to be in such high quality they can see the Venus transit across the sun happening on the moon, we should be able to see these landing sites, finally, and in a quality that leaves no one asking questions one way or the other.

cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com
(visit the link for the full news article)

NASA will only let you see the photos they choose to put out. I doubt that they will allow you to see anything worthwhile. They will superimpose photos over the top of their images, remove images, bluro9ut images and even just show zoomed out photos, but they will never let you see what is really there, or what may really NOT be there. This is learned from NASA's history of hiding everything. I don't believe NASA anymore than I do any politician.

Originally posted by alfa1

Originally posted by pianopraze
I've heard several reasons why it supposedly couldn't do it...

it's too close, the optics are designed to focus on objects further away...
it's to bright, the optics are not designed to focus on anything that bright...

to others... there seems to be no end of reason why hubble couldn't photograph the moon...

now it can???

Conspiracy theorists like to make stuff up.
The actual NASA Hubble telescope web sites says yes it can view the moon, and here's a picture of the moon to prove it can, in 1999....
hubblesite

A quick google search could have told you that.

The way to said it, I thought there is a clear picture of the moon taken by NASA. Again, I am disappointed on the quality of pictures of the moon that NASA have taken. Is that the best pic that they can get?

Originally posted by Phenomium

Originally posted by epsilon69




cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com
(visit the link for the full news article)

I don't believe NASA anymore than I do any politician.

Ditto.

Come on people and wake up. If NASA lied to us and there was no moon landing in the first place, then why would you believe them this time? Common sense tells you that the same guys are running the show and they sure aren't going to show you proof that they lied to you. Kind of like believing the DC gangsters in the white house. Why would you expect them to ruin a good scam?

Originally posted by epsilon69


This could be just what we need to prove/disprove the Apollo moon landings. If Hubble is watching the moon very closely and carefully for hours, we can check to see if the Apollo landing sites are actually there!

Personally I have my doubts that we actually went to the moon. What makes me question the validity of Apollo was the radiation problem, i never had to rely on the photographic evidence.

But now if NASA releases these images, considering they are going to be in such high quality they can see the Venus transit across the sun happening on the moon, we should be able to see these landing sites, finally, and in a quality that leaves no one asking questions one way or the other.

cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com
(visit the link for the full news article)

You should be able to do that with just about any good telescope. Hubble has always been said t be far-sighted when people asked NASA to point it at the Moon and other bodies within our solar system. NASA's always said it wouldn't be able to take good pictures....? WTF is it doing now, wearing glasses?

reply to post by Phenomium


Obviously you have never looked at the LRO images and I am not talking about the landing sites

Originally posted by DJW001
I thought I'd just pop into this slanging fest to remind everyone that Hubble will not be taking pictures of the Moon; it will be taking highly sensitive spectrograms of the sunlight reflected off the lunar surface in order to analyze Venus' atmosphere. Ciao.

So you are calling this thread a hoax too?

Originally posted by wmd_2008
reply to post by longjohnbritches

 

Do YOU actually read a post in full before you type your BS

Sparrowstail claimed Hubble could image distant solar systems so that why I asked to see an image because it would have to show a star with planets round it

edit on 9-5-2012 by wmd_2008 because: (no reason given)

Well no I stay away from off topic tripe.
This is a scam thread. Why should hoaxers be worried about Hubble? This is all crapola.

TextI, too, was thinking I had read that somewhere, that they previously stated that Hubble couldn't be used to view the moon.

reply to post by notquiteright


Can't remember all of this but in 2009 the Hubble Telescope was repaired and new high tech gear were installed. Prior to 2009 I think you are right. I believe it was the lens that would not focus because the moon was too close. Don't really remember all of the details.

reply to post by samkent


All of the moon rocks that they brought back prove that something went there and brought back rocks. Many independent specialists have confirmed that the rocks they tested had to have come from the moon.

reply to post by epsilon69

Personally I have my doubts that we actually went to the moon. What makes me question the validity of Apollo was the radiation problem, i never had to rely on the photographic evidence.

You mean the Van Allen Belts?

Sadly, I can't find a good source for this quote, but I have posted it before. See, like many of you, I heard about the Van Allen Belts and said, wait, they would have died! And that's the thing, that's where most of you stopped, you didn't even bother to google what they are or what they do.

Instead of posting that, how about a quote from the man who discovered them, and had them named in his honor. The quote is referencing a fox moon hoax tv special in which it was stated that the Van Allen belts would have given all of the astronauts a deadly dose of radiation.

The recent Fox TV show, which I saw, is an ingenious and entertaining assemblage of nonsense. The claim that radiation exposure during the Apollo missions would have been fatal to the astronauts is only one example of such nonsense. James A. Van Allen

reply to post by pianopraze


Good call Piano...I totally forgot about that little tidbit of info that they tried to shove down our throats years ago about Hubble & the moon...I think they said something like, we cannot view the moon with Hubble, it is too bright, and could damage the optics...

Originally posted by sith9157
reply to post by pianopraze

 

Good call Piano...I totally forgot about that little tidbit of info that they tried to shove down our throats years ago about Hubble & the moon...I think they said something like, we cannot view the moon with Hubble, it is too bright, and could damage the optics...

Good for you guys you finnaly get it This is a crapola thread that should be trashed. Or put in a HOAX forum. I will post the ATS rules.

reply to post by longjohnbritches

So you are calling this thread a hoax too?

No, I'm merely pointing out why there will be no "pictures."