It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Malynn
Ok, I've had enough. I read up to 6 pages of this thread but then got fed-up.
I am willing to believe you were there the next day. I'm willing to believe no plane hit the pentagon, as I too am very skeptical of the official story, and the evidence just doesn't make sense. However, you sir are doing nothing to improve your case.
The opponents/skeptics in this thread have been extremely civilized. Apparently you haven't spent much time around here to know how rare that is. They've asked simple questions in the process of attempting to look at all angles of your story rationally. You've responded with nothing but belligerance, ridicule, and scathing remarks. Unless of course the poster was buying your story without question. Under normal circumstances all your body hair would have been singed away by the flames of the skeptics that are usually hunting topics like this one.
If you can't take the heat you've come to the wrong place. Especially lukewarm heat like you've been taking in this thread. I have a hard time listening to and defending someone's theory when they can't withstand scrutiny.
Originally posted by shortsticks
Funny how they say that if there were first-hand accounts, we'd see them. But then when a few do surface (like mine) the initial reaction is to shut it down. Well certainly, that's not up to me to decide. Plus enough people have already seen this thread to make your case that all the more suspicious. So have at it, I say.
Originally posted by grey580
reply to post by shortsticks
I see.
Well that cinches it.
You refuse to confront me with something other than a LOL.
You obviously are a troll.
You can't explain or refute the visual evidence in an intelligent manner.
Who's paying you to post this bs stuff online?
Originally posted by getreadyalready
reply to post by shortsticks
Government regulation. I lead a team of investigators. My degree was originally Chemical Engineering, but I am 2 semesters short of that degree and instead finishing up a public administration degree. I am also a private pilot.
I am the perfect shill! I was also a Mod on this site for awhile, which makes my shilldom even more perfect!
I really am logging off now though!edit on 18-4-2012 by getreadyalready because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Alfie1
Originally posted by shortsticks
reply to post by Alfie1
Let me ask, as a newcomer to this forum, how does a new thread garner so much attention? Are they watching 24/7, I mean, all the time, or just when they're alerted to things from their superiors?
It has garnered attention because many on here take 9/11 issues seriously. Unfortunately that can be abused by someone starting a bs thread for their own amusement..
Originally posted by flexy123
What qualifies you to be able to see, spot and identify plane parts?
How many plane crash sites have you expected in the past, including all kinds of impacts/angles of impact, commercial/military craft etc.?
I am asking since it's a LOGICAL thing to do with 99,99% of "I know the truth of 9/11" people being armchair scientists. Again..before you (OR ANYONE) comes and makes semi-scientific claims and sells them as "truth", i would like to see proof that the person is even capable of making such a statement based on their experience.edit on 18-4-2012 by flexy123 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by DrEugeneFixer
Originally posted by shortsticks
Funny how they say that if there were first-hand accounts, we'd see them. But then when a few do surface (like mine) the initial reaction is to shut it down. Well certainly, that's not up to me to decide. Plus enough people have already seen this thread to make your case that all the more suspicious. So have at it, I say.
He's suggesting that your story is merely trolling. You have provided no evidence besides your word. The mere word of an ATS commenter isn't worth jack. I'll take this seriously once I see some evidence. I definitely think this belongs in the "grey area" if not the hoax bin.
Originally posted by Annie Mossity
reply to post by shortsticks
shortsticks,
While I certainly have my questions and doubts with regards the veracity of the 'official story' regarding what Actually happened and took place on that fateful day back in '01. However, you've done nothing here so far to add any shred of credibility to your supposed claims of having been @ langley, the pentagon or anywhere else near the same on the 12th.
What you have done, throughout, is to since have stooped to the level of near outright 'trollery' ... what with the various personal attacks and deviations from Your own topic, in amidst and all the while.
I had to step out for a bit, run some errands and go to the post office, but having since returned and gone back through the last few pages of interactions and replies, it's become quite clear - your 'purpose' here.
Quite the pathetic play on others for your own personal and rather obvious 'enjoyment'. - so it would seem. :shk:
First it was ' I have proof of no plane @ the pentagon', then it somehow got all convoluted and into the masons are wussies [whatever the hell that's supposed to mean] and now you seem to just be acting out against any opposition whatsoever that calls into question your views, claims or anything otherwise seeking some sort of actual validation.
Yeah. Your purpose and intent here seem quite clear.
Originally posted by karen61057
reply to post by crankyoldman
No one needed to be told any official story. The days events unfolded before our very eyes.
I dont know about you but I never left the TV screen for more than a few minutes that day. I wasnt 'fed" an official story, I watched it.
Originally posted by grey580
reply to post by shortsticks
The question is.
Given that there is some photographic evidence of plane parts.
With examples in my prior posts.
How do you explain the presence of engine parts, fuselage, landing gear and tire rims in some of the pictures taken after the crash?
If in fact there was no plane?
Originally posted by shortsticks
Originally posted by karen61057
reply to post by crankyoldman
No one needed to be told any official story. The days events unfolded before our very eyes.
I dont know about you but I never left the TV screen for more than a few minutes that day. I wasnt 'fed" an official story, I watched it.
and yet you weren't there. in any of those places.