It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MamaJ
Ha! Well...now I really wonder if the escaping neutrinos are really faster than light?
Cover up? Or is he really that ashamed?
Originally posted by DJW001
The news that neutrinos were detected rocked the world; if it were true,
Originally posted by ErtaiNaGia
Yes, this is definatly a coverup, as the original tests were repeated....
Several Hundred Times
Not to mention independently corroborated by at least 2 other facilities around the world.
Originally posted by petrus4
Find a single scientist or inventor...one...who became a household name, who wasn't considered fringe at best, or a complete outcast at worst, by the "mainstream scientific community," in their own time.
Originally posted by LightSpeedDriver
reply to post by DJW001
I can't say the news particularly shocks me but like the previous poster noted, it is indeed sad that he felt compelled to resign. Is it not one of our human qualities that we tend to learn from out mistakes?
As someone once said: "Show me a man who never made a mistake and I'll show you a man who never did anything."edit on 2/4/12 by LightSpeedDriver because: Typo
Originally posted by stumason
reply to post by Rocketman7
I don't believe neutrino's have an electromagnetic component, they are neutral after all (clue is in the name ) so I am not sure your idea will work...
Good thinking though, but the only reason neutrino's can go through hundreds of Km of solid rocks is because they are so tiny it's like launching a tennis ball blindly through the solar system and expecting to hit a planet.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by soficrow
Precisely. And undermining one of the fundamental principles of the theory of Relativity would be catastrophic in today's political and economic climate.
Why? How are politics and the economy affected by relativity?
If the lead loses the support of his team he can't function. Stepping down would be the only recourse.
edit on 4/2/2012 by Phage because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by soficrow
Start changing the basic premises and assumptions and who knows where it might all lead? Protests, economic collapse, the list goes on.
Sure, the advancement of science has always led to protests and economic collapse. Hasn't it?
Ninety-one percent of bird species are apparently monogamous (Darwin 1871;. Lack 1968).
Victorian values and the censoring presence of his prudish daughter blinded Charles Darwin to female promiscuity and delayed the study of sperm competition for 100 years
...Why did Darwin ignore the evidence and why did it take a century for others to make the connection?
Did you know that monogamy in birds has traditionally been reported at better than 90 percent, but that recent DNA research has revealed a very different picture of the avian world?
You expect Occupy Relativity demonstrations? "Save our slow neutrinos!"
Originally posted by Xcalibur254
To those saying this smells like a cover up all I can say is that the reasoning behind your claim makes no sense. One of the hardest things to do as a scientist is to obtain funding. Do you really think the money would dry up if the laws of physics were found to be wrong? If anything money would start being handed out like candy as the whole world races to figure out how the universe actually works. Plus, this would give most scientists their best opportunity at becoming a household name and leaving a lasting mark on science as a whole. Then there's the fact that if FTL were found to be possible it would create entirely new industries and the jobs that go along with them giving a bump to the world economy. The claims of cover up and conspiracy just don't make any sense from a logical standpoint.
Originally posted by F4guy
Originally posted by GLontra
This is obviously a cover up.
The neutrinos were REALLY faster than light.
If you're so sure of this, then you should have no problem in quantifying the rest mass of a superluminal neutrino. No? Or at least give us the proof.