It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by wildtimes
reply to post by sk0rpi0n
And how did you come to believe what you believe today? Did you really read the bible all by yourself and understand that it actually taught the trinity and the sin sacrifice?
Would you rather have a non-christian read the bible on his own? Or should somebody else explain what the bible is all about, and inject all those wrong christian doctrines into his mind?
Its like having a novel that I'd really want you to read but I fear you wont understand it, so I'll just narrate my understanding of the book to you i.e - tell you what I understood of the book. How would you know if I ever made a mistake in comprehending the novel.
Yes, it's exactly like that. "Here's this great novel....but, since it's over your head, I'll just give you the synopsis. Mmmmkay? No no, you don't need to worry, I have it all sorted. Just listen to me."
No Wild, with my experience I usually find people trying to attack it only cherry-pick it to death. I don't mean that offensively. For example, people call God horrible, evil, and a murderer, but never consider that He is also loving and righteous and hates sin and rebellion. That He also says He'll destroy His enemies.
Or another one, they'll attack God because He killed all the firstborn of Egypt, but ignore that they first killed all the firstborn of the Hebrews and God was avenging their blood.
And how did you come to believe what you believe today?
Did you really read the bible all by yourself and understand that it actually taught the trinity and the sin sacrifice?
Would you rather have a non-christian read the bible on his own?
Or should somebody else explain what the bible is all about, and inject all those wrong christian doctrines into his mind?
Well since the bible is a very long and tedious book... said reader would likely find a church and let someone else tell him what it says inside... and thus another "christian" is born...
On the other hand IF said reader started at the right spot, they would develop an understanding of the one man most of the book is about... and thus, an understanding of what God is about as well...
Skorpion's questions to lonewolf were astute and valid. To wit:
By not describing Jesus, Jesus is being foretold?
2) Abhraham / Isaac. "Father, where is the lamb?" "God Himself will provide the sacrifice, my son." Note that God did NOT provide a lamb to Abraham, despite sparing Isaac. What DID he provide? A ram. Where, then, was the promised lamb? Christ.
It was describing an earlier fallen Israelite king who was killed in battle, and used to describe through analogy, the fate of those carried off into captivity, through no fault of their own but as punishment for the sins of the people in general. The captives, which were the upper class of society and included the temple priesthood, felt themselves unjustly punished, where they saw themselves blameless, and only other people as sinners.
3) Isaiah 53: "He was led like a SHEEP to the slaughter..." "He was pierced for our transgressions, wounded for our iniquities". Sounds like substitutionary atonement to me.
The word in the Hebrew only describes a covering where skin could be one example, so it is a description of a function, and not as a source from which it was taken. It could just mean clothes, and nowhere describes how or from what it was make.
4) Adam and Eve - who clothed them? God did. With what? ANIMAL SKIN. "Without the shedding of blood, there is no remission of sin" (Hebrews 9:22).
Oh, no, please do, if in fact you have any further material. I keep hearing people go on and on about how there is all this evidence, but they never produce any.
I could go on and on. I won't.
I think if there is an analogy to be made from this story, it would be the angry god is the natural universe which endangers every human being who lives, and Jesus is the angel who holds the door from popping open in the waves sweeping around the globe in the midst of the storm.
1) Noah's Ark. Worldwide judgement. One door. One way to be saved. Open to all, but few chose to honour what God had done.
News to me but I am glad for this little personal revelation about yourself and I think it will help to put some of what you write into context. I sort of wondered how you came to this particular perspective you have on Christianity and I can't blame you, that's for sure.
I am a hindu by birth....
Originally posted by boymonkey74
If we could get someone who has never heard of the bible and was an adult they would read it and say "what a load of tosh" and throw it away..
Which puts you at the same level as those who heard Jesus preach, saying, "If you believe in me you will never die". It would have seemed just as ridiculous to them as it now does to you.
Originally posted by novastrike81
Originally posted by boymonkey74
If we could get someone who has never heard of the bible and was an adult they would read it and say "what a load of tosh" and throw it away..
Which is why I was only a believer for less than a year. It makes no sense if you read it as an adult and compare and contrast what you read.
News to me but I am glad for this little personal revelation about yourself and I think it will help to put some of what you write into context. I sort of wondered how you came to this particular perspective you have on Christianity and I can't blame you, that's for sure.
you were not a believer actually... and these words carry no weight.
Originally posted by novastrike81
Originally posted by boymonkey74
If we could get someone who has never heard of the bible and was an adult they would read it and say "what a load of tosh" and throw it away..
Which is why I was only a believer for less than a year. It makes no sense if you read it as an adult and compare and contrast what you read.
Originally posted by boymonkey74
If we could get someone who has never heard of the bible and was an adult they would read it and say "what a load of tosh" and throw it away..
Originally posted by SisyphusRide
you were not a believer actually... and these words carry no weight.
Originally posted by novastrike81
Originally posted by SisyphusRide
you were not a believer actually... and these words carry no weight.
No True Scotsman Fallacy. That's like saying I never used to believe in Santa Claus or the Easter Bunny growing up as a kid.
Your statement is full of ignorance and stupidity.
Originally posted by novastrike81
reply to post by SisyphusRide
It's irrelevant or not whether or not you feel engaged or not. Your previous comment is fallacious and needed to be put to rest. I don't understand why it's even used as a counter-argument; it makes no sense.
Christians have a legitimate argument in saying that God is triune. One does not have to look hard to find the evidence for this. The scriptures affirm that the Father, Son, and Spirit are one.
Just as YHWH sent an angel with his presence to watch over his people in Exodus, Jesus comes to fulfill the Holy Law with YHWH's presence. When someone comes in God's name, it can correctly be said that God is with them therefore they are God.
"For the life of the flesh is in the blood: and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls: for it is the blood that maketh an atonement for the soul." - Leviticus 17:11
I don't understand how you could possibly misconstrue the purpose of Yeshua's death. It's literally in black in white.
Originally posted by sk0rpi0n
reply to post by CaptainNemo
Christians have a legitimate argument in saying that God is triune. One does not have to look hard to find the evidence for this. The scriptures affirm that the Father, Son, and Spirit are one.
I could list several unambiguous statements from God and His prophets and Jesus where they all affirm God is one.
Can you provide just one direct statement from God or His prophets or Jesus where they say God is triune?
You cant, because there are none. Instead, you would list a number of vague verses which supposedly "prove" the trinity or present your interpretation of a certain verse and pass it off as "evidence" of a triune God.
You ignore a direct and clear statement from God Himself that He is one, and look for things involving a triune God elsewhere.
Just as YHWH sent an angel with his presence to watch over his people in Exodus, Jesus comes to fulfill the Holy Law with YHWH's presence. When someone comes in God's name, it can correctly be said that God is with them therefore they are God.
Both the angel and Jesus were only representatives of God. They were given the power by God and could not do anything of their own.
When someone comes in God's name, it means they are representing God.
If God is "with" them, it simply means they are under control or being watched by God. It doesn't mean they are God.
Leviticus is mostly a rule book of dos and donts.
You will notice that the verse before and after the one you posted, shows that there is a ban on consuming blood.
Ironically John 6:51-58, where Jesus (symbolically) tells his followers to "drink his blood" is often cited to prove the sacrifice.
Since you are obviously not a Christian, but belong to the anti-christians, I don't see your motivation to get into Christian doctrines, other than to possibly lull them into a state of complacency as you subvert their religion.
I don't understand how you could possibly misconstrue the purpose of Yeshua's death. It's literally in black in white.