It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by FurvusRexCaeli
reply to post by GoodOlDave
I used Google Groups to attempt to see when "pull it" = demolition entered the lexicon. Searching for "'pull it' 9/11," I could not find any posts with that meaning until January 2004 ("WTC demolished" on alt.conspiracy). I tried a general search using the terms "'pull it' demolition OR demolish" for all dates in the archive up to 1 January 2001, read the first few pages of results, and found no evidence that the phrase "pull it" was associated with demolition.
Next, I searched Google Books for "'pull it' demolition OR demolish." There are references to structures being "pulled down," but I do not see the word "pull" in this sense standing without the modifier "down." I searched some other databases (the "deep web," or whatever you want to call it), and again, there was "pull it down" but not "pull it." In at least one article, to pull a building down refers explicitly to use of an excavator, not explosives (Kosub, "Demolition: It's An Art," On-Site, June 2000).
Not conclusive, but narrows down your search. If you want to know who said "pull it" was slang for controlled demolition, look for people talking about 9/11 after the event but before February 2004.
Originally posted by lunarasparagus
If the info presented in this video is accurate, it seems like a pretty strong case against the truther "pull it" argument:
Originally posted by LightSpeedDriver
reply to post by lunarasparagus
Your profile viewed.
3 threads made, all on 9/11 subject matter and all your posts are related to the same. Do you really have such a narrow interest focus or do you have an agenda? Now go view my profile. I invite others to do the same with my profile and yours and make up their own minds.
ETA Although goodoldave has a lot more posts and threads...guess what? They all seem to be in the 9/11 forum. Oh my, lions and tigers and bears.edit on 21/3/12 by LightSpeedDriver because: ETA
ETA2 And a bunch of copy pasta.edit on 21/3/12 by LightSpeedDriver because: ETA2
ETA3 "I have looked over Jordan and I have seen, things are not what they seem." Pink Floyd, Sheep from the album Animals.edit on 21/3/12 by LightSpeedDriver because: ETA3
Originally posted by FurvusRexCaeli
reply to post by GoodOlDave
I used Google Groups to attempt to see when "pull it" = demolition entered the lexicon. Searching for "'pull it' 9/11," I could not find any posts with that meaning until January 2004 ("WTC demolished" on alt.conspiracy). I tried a general search using the terms "'pull it' demolition OR demolish" for all dates in the archive up to 1 January 2001, read the first few pages of results, and found no evidence that the phrase "pull it" was associated with demolition.
Next, I searched Google Books for "'pull it' demolition OR demolish." There are references to structures being "pulled down," but I do not see the word "pull" in this sense standing without the modifier "down." I searched some other databases (the "deep web," or whatever you want to call it), and again, there was "pull it down" but not "pull it." In at least one article, to pull a building down refers explicitly to use of an excavator, not explosives (Kosub, "Demolition: It's An Art," On-Site, June 2000).
Not conclusive, but narrows down your search. If you want to know who said "pull it" was slang for controlled demolition, look for people talking about 9/11 after the event but before February 2004.
Date: January 9, 1996
File No. 5370TAUN
TO: Vancouver City Council
FROM: City Building Inspector
SUBJECT: Demolition of Dangerous Building
5370 Taunton Street
Lot 11, Block 18, 19 and 22, District Lot 37, Plan 2220
COUNCIL POLICY
Section 324A of the Vancouver Charter enables Council by resolution or By-
law to declare any building, in or upon any private or public lands a
nuisance or dangerous to the public safety or health and by such By-law or
resolution, to order that building to be removed by the owner, agent,
lessee or occupier thereof.
City staff have contacted the property owner by phone to request that he
obtain a demolition permit and pull down and demolish the building,
however, the owner has demonstrated no desire to cooperate.
A controlled demolition would have minimized the damage caused by the building’s imminent collapse and potentially save lives. Many law enforcement personnel, firefighters and other journalists were aware of this possible option. There was no secret. There was no conspiracy. While I was talking with a fellow reporter and several NYPD officers, Building 7 suddenly collapsed, and before it hit the ground, not a single sound emanated from the tower area. There were no explosives; I would have heard them. In fact, I remember that in those few seconds, as the building sank to the ground that I was stunned by how quiet it was. Read more: www.foxnews.com...
Originally posted by LightSpeedDriver
reply to post by lunarasparagus
If ifs and ands were pots and pans there'd be no need for tinkers. Of course we noticed your use of the word IF.
edit on 21/3/12 by LightSpeedDriver because: Clarification
Originally posted by lunarasparagus
reply to post by longjohnbritches
Wow, you people are defensive. Notice I said IF the info in the video is accurate (no assumption that it is), then it SEEMS like a strong argument (no assumption that it is). But thanks for setting me straight, I forgot this was a court of law.
Originally posted by LightSpeedDriver
reply to post by lunarasparagus
You assume wrong but your argument comes over in the post I replied to as little better than the childish wailings of someone who has been called out. Fail, major fail. And goodnight.
Originally posted by lunarasparagus
Originally posted by LightSpeedDriver
reply to post by lunarasparagus
You assume wrong but your argument comes over in the post I replied to as little better than the childish wailings of someone who has been called out. Fail, major fail. And goodnight.
Yeah, but still, I'm just sayin'. My dad's pretty tough.
Close-Up of WTC-7 Collapse Footage Shows Unmistakable Demolition Charges
demolish
v demolish [diˈmoliʃ]
to pull or tear down They're demolishing the old buildings in the centre of town.