It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by XXX777
I read some news today about a new law that requires condom use in porn films.
What sense does that make?
Originally posted by ErroneousDylan
Originally posted by XXX777
I read some news today about a new law that requires condom use in porn films.
What sense does that make?
Uhh.... it's safer?
Originally posted by XXX777
I read some news today about a new law that requires condom use in porn films.
What sense does that make? Who has the political and legislative power to require something like this, and why do they want to drive the porn industry away?
It seems to me like porn is a rather non-location specific film type. Porn made at a house with a swimming pool in Los Angeles will probably be replaced by porn made at a house with a swimming pool in Texas or Florida. Why would Los Angeles want to push this business away?
Originally posted by Nephlim
reply to post by ErroneousDylan
it makes no sense for the government to control the private, non violent behavior of two consenting adults. what's next? throw some anti sodomy laws in the books because disease spread is higher with that? say you can't have two guys on a girl because its disrespectful to women?
Originally posted by ErroneousDylan
Using a condom is much safer than "raw dogging" it, and if people watch porn where they are not using a condom they could take the impression that it is perfectly okay to go out and have sexual intercourse with anybody they please without protection.
Porn creates these types of fantasies in people's minds. They watch group sex porn with no protection and it seems appealing to them. Then they have the urge to do the same thing, which can be dangerous.