It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Sherlock2009
Jesus......
Prescott Bush was "trading with the enemy" and helping the Nazi's win the war and his family went on to occupy the whitehouse, not life in jail ..@#$%^&*
Originally posted by Sherlock2009
Poor Manning, he did the right thing.
Some things just dont make sense now do they..
In March 2007 a convoy of U.S. Marines, after being hit by an explosives-rigged minivan, opened fire with automatic weapons as they tore down a six-mile stretch of highway. They hit just about anyone in their way—including teenage girls in fields, motorists in cars, old men walking down the road. Nineteen unarmed civilians were killed and 50 wounded. None of this, however, was reported in the initial military account written by the Marines involved.
The Afghan Human Rights Commission published a report into the shooting which said the victims included a 16-year-old newlywed girl carrying a bundle of grass and a 75-year-old man walking back from shopping. There was an inquiry in which 50 witnesses, including Afghans, testified. But the four soldiers who fired their weapons did not testify because they had not been granted immunity from prosecution
September 2009, in Kunduz in the north of Afghanistan, NATO forces bomb a crowd of people surrounding two fuel tankers stuck in a riverbed. The military reports say the air strike was authorized "after ensuring that no civilians were in the vicinity" and the "battle damage assessment" claimed the 56 deaths had been "enemy insurgents." Media reports followed by official inquiries, however, established something closer to the real death toll, which included 30 to 70 civilian
Originally posted by Sherlock2009
Jesus......
Prescott Bush was "trading with the enemy" and helping the Nazi's win the war and his family went on to occupy the whitehouse, not life in jail ..@#$%^&*
Poor Manning, he did the right thing.
Some things just dont make sense now do they..
In March 2007 a convoy of U.S. Marines, after being hit by an explosives-rigged minivan, opened fire with automatic weapons as they tore down a six-mile stretch of highway. They hit just about anyone in their way—including teenage girls in fields, motorists in cars, old men walking down the road. Nineteen unarmed civilians were killed and 50 wounded. None of this, however, was reported in the initial military account written by the Marines involved.
The Afghan Human Rights Commission published a report into the shooting which said the victims included a 16-year-old newlywed girl carrying a bundle of grass and a 75-year-old man walking back from shopping. There was an inquiry in which 50 witnesses, including Afghans, testified. But the four soldiers who fired their weapons did not testify because they had not been granted immunity from prosecution
September 2009, in Kunduz in the north of Afghanistan, NATO forces bomb a crowd of people surrounding two fuel tankers stuck in a riverbed. The military reports say the air strike was authorized "after ensuring that no civilians were in the vicinity" and the "battle damage assessment" claimed the 56 deaths had been "enemy insurgents." Media reports followed by official inquiries, however, established something closer to the real death toll, which included 30 to 70 civilian
An inability, at times, to distinguish between non combatant / civilian and threat / foe.
Originally posted by Soshh
Individuals who are as mentally unstable as Manning should not be permitted to serve in the military in the first place, never mind be trusted with databases filled with shed loads of classified material.
This case has highlighted serious deficiencies in the vetting process, though with hundreds of thousands of people surfing those networks I suppose one should not be surprised if the odd cretin or two slips through the cracks.
Originally posted by Xcathdra
reply to post by alienorgy
Actually Manning's lawyer used that argument for part of Manning's defense. He argued that the military knew there were problems with manning going all the way back to boot camp and his advanced school out of basic.
Questions surrounding his sexuality were also brought up in reference to effects that has on an individual who had no real recourse to end some of the harassment (dont ask dont tell was still in effect, so filing a complaint with the chain of command that people are making fun of you because your gay only adds insult to injury).
Based on all of that, the defense is saying its the Army's fault this occurred.
The prosecution (according to earlier articles) essentially made the accusation Manning purposely did this to embarrass / get even with the military for not helping him when he needed it.
When this goes into the courtroom im sure we will have some of our questions answered. The Prosecution did say they are not seeking the death penalty, so based on that and what they charged him with it will range from 40 years - to life. Because this occurred during a time of war I would expect, if found guilty, the longer sentence (life sentence or running individual sentences consecutively instead of concurrently..
Originally posted by alienorgy
Originally posted by Soshh
Individuals who are as mentally unstable as Manning should not be permitted to serve in the military in the first place, never mind be trusted with databases filled with shed loads of classified material.
This case has highlighted serious deficiencies in the vetting process, though with hundreds of thousands of people surfing those networks I suppose one should not be surprised if the odd cretin or two slips through the cracks.
and you know he's mentally unstable how?
Originally posted by alienorgy
Well, I dont know your exact thoughts on it but mine,,,,,,,,,,the kid is a hero
Originally posted by Soshh
Originally posted by alienorgy
Originally posted by Soshh
Individuals who are as mentally unstable as Manning should not be permitted to serve in the military in the first place, never mind be trusted with databases filled with shed loads of classified material.
This case has highlighted serious deficiencies in the vetting process, though with hundreds of thousands of people surfing those networks I suppose one should not be surprised if the odd cretin or two slips through the cracks.
and you know he's mentally unstable how?
He admitted as much himself. It was even used in his defence. Have you been living under a rock?
Originally posted by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi
Originally posted by Soshh
He admitted as much himself. It was even used in his defence. Have you been living under a rock?
Have you? Obviously he would say that if it meant more lenient charges. Just because it has been established, doesn't make it true in the least.
I mean, really put some thought into this for just a brief moment. The guy said he was mentally unstable, so you believe that he is mentally unstable? Who the hell would ever say that they are mentally unstable? And is this something that a mentally unstable person would do? No, it isn't. In fact, it is pretty damn sane if you ask me, considering that the whole American machine is virtually psychotic these days.