It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Like a dead chicken being plucked, Obama has lost his power and his support. Six months or so ago, French President Sarkozy called Obama, "Insane". Other world leaders have publicly called him incompetent and other derogatory names.
Since then, major news in America has been slowly, quietly, as if testing the waters, pointing out Obama's faults and crimes. Little by little they are feeding America, and the World, the truth about the man they fought so hard to cover up for these past four years. Feather by feather, the chicken known as Obama, is being plucked. The most hated psychopath on Earth and his administration are going to be thoroughly plucked, gutted, tossed in an oven, cooked and devoured. And like any dead carcass with no use, Obama and his faithful supporters will be thrown onto a garbage heap until they rot to nothing.
Like all stupid people, he thinks everyone else is stupider than he is. There is, however, one thing he has done well. Every facet of American life and business has gone down considerably, except for foreclosures, unemployment, bankruptcies and business closures.
Pamela Barnett was a plaintiff in a case brought by Orly Taiz demanding proof that Obama was eligible to be President. That court arrogantly and illegally refused to hear their complaint. Pamela Barnett's character reflects that of most Americans: When you treat her like a dog, she'll jump up and bite you. So she formed an organization to teach and help people how to have Obama taken off of all 50 State ballots. And it is working very well. Her site is here: obamaballotchallenge.com...
And it is working. Obama has been denied to be on the primary ballot in Alabama until he proves he is eligible. Georgia has a ruling pending in 3 weeks to keep Obama off the ballot until he can prove he is eligible.
The amazingly tenacious, Carl Swensson, fighting to get Obama out of the office of the President, by knocking on every official's door he could find for four years, finally found two government employees who were not traitors and took their Oath of Office seriously: The Georgia Secretary of State, Brian Kemp and Deputy Chief Judge Michael Malihi of the Georgia Office of Administrative Hearings. Meet Carl Swensson at this site: www.RiseUpForAmerica.com
Only a Natural Born Citizen can be President. There are at least three US Supreme Court cases defining Natural Born Citizen. The Us Constitution refers to "The Law of Nations", which defines Natural Born Citizen. There are dozens of letters of correspondence from the signers of the Declaration of Independence and creators of the US Constitution defining Natural Born Citizen. The United States Congress, in the past nine years has made eight unsuccessful attempts to change the wording of the US Constitution to say that foreign born or children of foreign born parents can be the President of the United States of America. These elected employees have repeatedly proven that they know damn well what a Natural Born Citizen is. The record is clearly established, through
over 250 years of acknowledged definition that Natural Born Citizen is a person born on American soil, to PARENTS plural. For liberals and democrats and other traitors, that means that in order for a person to be our President, the stork has to deliver him inside America and both his mommy and daddy must be citizens of the United States of America.
So, Georgia, Alabama, Tennessee, Illinois, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, California, Hawaii and Arizona have either lawsuits filed or ballot challenges filed to keep Obama off the ballot until he can prove he is eligible to run for election. Activities are going on in 26 other states, with the same goal in mind, to keep Obama off the ballot, unless he can prove he is eligible to run. This is further proof that it is the states that control the federal government and not the other way around. The federal government is a group of full time employees managing certain pertinent affairs concerning the states. These permanent employees are managed by part-time employees called politicians, which are periodically elected by the People. They are all expendable. It is these temporary employees who we accuse of committing treason and other High Crimes against the citizens of America as well as other Nations of the World..
When Obama and his associates are removed from American society, as We the People want to, We are ready to and We will gladly, extend our friendship to the many nations in this home we call Earth.
And to the people who voted for Obama, because he was going to steal our money and our creations and fraudulently turn them over to you: "How's that Hope and Change working out for you?"
Originally posted by kawika
News from Pravda dated 1/30/12
Pravda Story Link Here
Like a dead chicken being plucked, Obama has lost his power and his support. Six months or so ago, French President Sarkozy called Obama, "Insane". Other world leaders have publicly called him incompetent and other derogatory names.
Oh, boy... As much as the Rooskies hated Big Ron, at least they respected and feared him.
There are 2 more pages... Pravda is a fun paper. It was the official paper of the communist party years ago. Now it is kind of like the "World Net Daily". Although, they make some valid points there.
Originally posted by kawika
reply to post by captainnotsoobvious
I did read the story at your link.
Because I understand the intention of the founders, I am unconvinced. No presidents with conflicting allegiance to a foreign power would be acceptable. But hey, I am not the judge...
edit on 31-1-2012 by kawika because: corectolated spel'n erredit on 31-1-2012 by kawika because: corectolated spel'n err
Originally posted by ArchPlayer
reply to post by kaylaluv
Just because he likes getting his coc aine from here DOES NOT constitute allegance. His allegiance is questionable since he is from ANOTHER COUNTRY, a fact stated not only by his wife, but his African family members. His aunt, who was also a midwife, stated he WAS BORN IN KENYA.
Originally posted by ArchPlayer
reply to post by kaylaluv
Just because he likes getting his coc aine from here DOES NOT constitute allegance. His allegiance is questionable since he is from ANOTHER COUNTRY, a fact stated not only by his wife, but his African family members. His aunt, who was also a midwife, stated he WAS BORN IN KENYA.
This is just a plan to get somebody else more sinister in office down the road that may not be from here.
Mark my words.
The Constitution does not define the phrase natural-born citizen, and various opinions have been offered over time regarding its precise meaning. The Congressional Research Service has stated that the weight of scholarly legal and historical opinion indicates that the term means one who is entitled under the Constitution or laws of the United States to U.S. citizenship "at birth" or "by birth," including any child born "in" the United States (other than to foreign diplomats serving their country), the children of United States citizens born abroad, and those born abroad of one citizen parent who has met U.S. residency requirements.
Originally posted by captainnotsoobvious
Why are the birthers lying to try and destroy Obama? If they know he's legit (and they do, or else they wouldn't need to endlessly lie) why are they trying to generate a false issue to destroy a US President? It's a REAL conspiracy, but no one in the conspiracy world wants to look at it... funny.
Feb. 2 hearing on whether Illinois State Board of Elections will allow Barack Obama on the Illinois Presidential ballot even though he is NOT a NATURAL Born Citizen according to Supreme Court precedent Minor v. Happersett (1875)
Hearings are open to the public. Please attend to support the objectors if you can.
Obama’s father’s place of birth, Kenya East Africa is entered into evidence.
Pages 214 and 215 from Obama’s book, “Dreams from My Father” entered into evidence. Highlighted. This is where Obama indicates that, in 1966 or 1967 that his father’s history is mentioned. It states that his father’s passport had been revoked and he was unable to leave Kenya.
Testimony regarding the definition of Natural Born Citizen is given citing Minor vs Happersett opinion from a Supreme Court written opinion from 1875. The attorney points out the difference between “citizen” and “Natural Born Citizen” using charts and copies of the Minor vs Happersett opinion.
It is also pointed out that the 14th Amendment does not alter the definition or supersede the meaning of Natural Born. It is pointed out that lower court rulings do not conflict with the Supreme Court opinion nor do they over rule the Supreme Court Minor vs Happersett opinion.
The point is, to be a natural born citizen, one must have 2 parents who, at the time of the birth in question, be citizens of the United States. As Obama’s father was not a citizen, the argument is that Obama, constitutionally, is ineligible to serve as President.
Official certificate of nomination of Obama entered into evidence.
RNC certificate of nomination entered into evidence.
DNC language does NOT include language stating Obama is Qualified while the RNC document DOES. This shows a direct difference trying to establish that the DNC MAY possibly have known that Obama was not qualified.
This witness is an expert in information technology and photo shop. He testifies that the birth certificate Obama provided to the public is layered, multiple layered. This, he testifies, indicates that different parts of the certificate have been lifted from more than one original document.
Next witness.
Mr. Vogt.
Expert in document imaging and scanners for 18 years.
Mr. Vogt testifies that the birth certificate, posted online by Obama, is suspicious. States white lines around all the type face is caused by “unsharp mask” in Photoshop. Testifies that any document showing this, is considered to be a fraud.
States this is a product of layering.
Mr. Vogt testifies that a straight scan of an original document would not show such layering.
Also testifies that the date stamps shown on Obama documents should not be in exact same place on various documents as they are hand stamped. Obama’s documents are all even, straight and exactly the same indicating they were NOT hand stamped but layered into the document by computer.
Attorneys representing eight plaintiffs seeking to remove President Barack Obama's name from Georgia's Super Tuesday Democratic Primary ballot on March 6 have until close of business today to file their briefs in the case heard before deputy administrative law judge Michael Malihi last week in Atlanta.
Judge Malihi had originally set the deadline for briefs on February 6, 2012, a month out from the election. Judge Malihi will then file his brief containing Findings of Facts and Conclusion of Law with Brian Kemp, Georgia's Secretary of State.
Georgia law requires the Secretary of State to resolve issues regarding election disputes.
A month out from the election, Kemp will have to issue an opinion quickly in order for the Democratic ballots and voting machines to be ready for the primary vote.
Several bloggers who appear to be supportive of plaintiffs' cause have blogged that during the 32-minute pre-hearing conference held before last week's hearing Judge Malihi considered whether he should enter a default judgment in the case due to the absence of President Obama and counsel to the President Michael Jablonski. The America's Conservative News, January 31, 2012, reports that the lawyers representing the plaintiffs "...confirmed that (Judge) Malihi had simply considered granting them a default victory..."
Other bloggers suggest it is a foregone conclusion their side will win by default and that Judge Malihi only heard evidence to give the public a show.
Their logic defies legal procedure.
First, a default judgment is appropriate where a defendant fails to file an answer to the essential allegations in the complaint. Once the appropriate answer has been made defendant can elect "at his peril" to skip the hearing.
From the record it would appear that counsel for the President properly joined the issue and rebutted plaintiffs' contentions that the president is ineligible to hold the office of President of the United States of America. Thus it is incumbent upon plaintiffs to prove their case with credible evidence.
Secondly, by skipping the hearing the defendant's position is not placed at risk of peril if plaintiffs fail to carry their burden of proof by testimony and documentary evidence probative to the issues in the case.
Last week's hearing produced fast and loose talk couple with documents of dubious origins to support plaintiffs' contention that President Obama should be barred from the Georgia ballot in March and vicariously on the November General Election ballot as well.
bleacherreport.com...
I see no one has brought any fresh news today, so I will find some for us...
... A copy of the Candidate’s birth certificate is attached to the Candidate’s Motion to Strike and Dismiss the Objector’s Petition. The Hearing officer finds that the birth certificate clearly establishes the Candidate’s eligibility for office as a “Natural Born Citizen.
... the petition is based on an incorrect legal interpretation of what constitutes a "Natural Born Citizen".
... A copy of the Candidate’s birth certificate is attached to the Candidate’s Motion to Strike and Dismiss the Objector’s Petition. The Hearing officer finds that the birth certificate clearly establishes the Candidate’s eligibility for office as a “Natural Born Citizen.