It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by vogon42
reply to post by Akragon
Looks like a
"Leap of faith"
would have been easier than climbing over the christian religious symbol to get to god.
What is the artist REAL message here?
Originally posted by RevelationGeneration
I am here to tell all the members on this board that continually hate on Christians because you have a hatred against religion one thing. Christianity is not a RELIGION it's a RELATIONSHIP.... With our one and only savior, Jesus Christ. God's way to reach man, is through Christ.
Matthew 23:8-9
“But you are not to be called ‘Rabbi,’ for you have one Teacher, and you are all brothers. And do not call anyone on earth ‘father,’ for you have one Father, and he is in heaven.
Matthew 23:15
“Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You travel over land and sea to win a single convert, and when you have succeeded, you make them twice as much a child of hell as you are.”
He clearly was called by, and spoke to the 4 winds, which is a Pagan practice.
Originally posted by sacgamer25
I do understand what you are saying, but the law of the land does not lead to enlightenment. You have followed the law of love which has lead to enlightenment. The law of the land has accepted much that is not good for you. If the law of the land was perfect than I don’t believe we would have a need for Christ. But the law of the land leaves most empty, for they cannot understand the law of love at work in them.
The bible teaches one about the law of love, where it comes from, why it is. The worldly view does not teach what the bible teaches. The worldly view would have you believe that sometimes you have to war to keep your freedom. The worldly view leads to immorality, which leads to death of the spirit.
I do believe that you have followed the law of love, and I think you believe that this is worldly but I promise you that it is God’s spirit in you that leads you to live by the law of love, not this world. You may have found peace, because all things are possible by God, and if you follow love than you are doing the will of the father, but I still hold firm that you did not find this in the world but rather from the Spirit living inside you.
If the church had not corrupted the message so much you would understand that the bible perfectly explains the law of love that you live by. Either way listen to the Spirit that guides you to live by love, because it is the spirit of truth. But be wary of the spirit that guides you to do things that the bible calls immoral, not out of fear of hell, but out of the belief that your father only wants what is best for you.
I cannot argue that the bible has been twisted and corrupted by the evil of men, but I still hold firm that these ideas do not belong to the bible, and as such, do not belong to Christ, your version of "god", or Christianity all together.
My belief system has been practiced since long before anyone ever wrote of Christ, and it will still be practiced long after the last bible has rotted away.
So here's some things to consider the before next time you attack a Christian on the basis you hate religion. Alot of Christians actually hate religion too. Don't judge us on how you see hypocrites in the church behave. We are not all like them. Being Christian does not make us zealous religious people that are some how better than others, we have all sinned and fallen short of glory from God.
I'm sure I will get some of the typical responses with a few people feeling the need to shout "fairy tales" or "nicaea council" but before you post just save it, I'm really not interested in replying to that kind of foolishness I will just ignore it and you won't accomplish anything. I believe there are people here with more intelligence than that.
an argument that the philosophic burden of proof lies upon those who make unfalsifiable claims, not on those who reject them.
Originally posted by g0dhims3lf
reply to post by RevelationGeneration
Ok I assumed you ment the people that call the bible a fairy tale, yes giving vague answers with no backing is not helpful and those should remain spectators however the Spagetti Monster is a legitament argument to one debating religion.
an argument that the philosophic burden of proof lies upon those who make unfalsifiable claims, not on those who reject them.
source
My point was that you cannot debate a believer, even with facts/science/evidence. Belief/Faith vs. Facts is a losing argument. I have said before a supposed believer lost the argument for themselves by debating it in the first place. It comes off as if you have doubt and are looking for justification in your beliefs.edit on 15-1-2012 by g0dhims3lf because: (no reason given)edit on 15-1-2012 by g0dhims3lf because: grammeredit on 15-1-2012 by g0dhims3lf because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by windword
He clearly was called by, and spoke to the 4 winds, which is a Pagan practice.
You may be thinking of another Jesus, Jesus ben Ananias, who is told of by Josephus.
And they came to him, and awoke him, saying, Master, master, we perish. Then he arose, and rebuked the wind and the raging of the water: and they ceased, and there was a calm.
The Hebrew RUACH could mean either ‘sprit’ or ‘wind’ (or ‘god’) and typically it is a windy-airy spirit who ‘leads’ a prophet (cf: the 4th canonical ‘gospel of Yohanon’ = ‘The Wind blows where it wills, so it every one born of the Wind’ or = ‘the Spirit blows where it blows, so too is every son of man born of the Spirit…)
We see the same type of imagery in the Anti Nicene quotations from the Gospel of the Hebrews in the 2nd century AD (‘And he said to them, Just now my Mother the Holy Spirit led me by one of my Hairs on my beard to great Mount Tabor….’ an Aramaic Midrash on the Targum of Judges 4:6)
ORIGINAL SHORTER FORM of the TEMPTATION STORY:
Mark 1:12-13 - Immediately the Wind led him out into the wilderness, and he was in the desert forty days, being tempted by Satan. He was with the wild animals, and angels attended him.
LONGER ‘Quelle’ ADDITIONS of ‘Matthew’ (cf: Luke chapter 4)
Matthew 4:1-11 - Then Iesous was led BY THE WIND into the Desert to be tempted by the devil and to prepare [for it ] he fasted forty days and forty nights, and afterwards he was famished. The tempter came and said to him, "If you are [the King of the Judaeans] the Son of the Blessed One, then command these stones to become bread loaves"
Originally posted by RevelationGeneration
If the Bible was changed and corrupted by man it could be easily proven. The whole point is the scriptures have not been changed and are the same today as they were when first written. This is why I believe in them as opposed to other religious texts which can't be validated to the same degree as the bible. The Bible is 100% authentic and pure, the dead sea scrolls validate the old testament and the new testament is validated by more than 24000 manuscripts supporting the gospels.
To say the bible is corrupted without providing evidence is totally dishonest and show's you are not willing to look at evidence.
Originally posted by sacgamer25
There are two reasons that I disagree with you.
The first is from what I understand, what I admit is limited, Eastern and Pagan religions don’t always in my opinion agree with the law of love. There are several things permitted in these religions that are not permitted in the bible. Personally the bible teaches in perfect complement to the natural laws and the law of love.
The second is the fact that there is estimated to be about 7 billion bibles in print in nearly every known language. To me this can be explained by nothing less than an act of God. I simply believe that God is love and because God is love he has guided the world to the book that best teaches one about God’s love.
It is hard for me to imagine a time where the most published book every year since the invention of the modern printing press would somehow just disappear.