It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Unemployment benefits peaked in 2007-08 at £1.4 billion during the year.
With a possible final bill of £8bn London's 2012 Olympics could be the most costly sports event ever, says a report obtained by The Observer. Why were the original figures so much lower?
As of June 2010 UK costs exceeded £20bn for the Iraq and Afghanistan wars combined.
Libya conflict may cost UK £1.75bn
More than half the planned £16billion high speed rail line from London to Birmingham will be buried in tunnels or sunk in deep cuttings as the Coalition attempts to appease critics of the project.
Originally posted by just1cornell0
reply to post by woodwardjnr
i missed that about poundland getting subsidies for 'volunteers'... which is definately MEGA wrong.
BUT, i still feel its right that people on JSA should be made (yes made) to work. but it should be changed to, at locally run business' which would in turn help the local community & economy and in turn may help people get paid work. rather than bloating the pockets of these multi-million ££ companies.... oh the joy of Capitalism
Originally posted by TheDemonUK
Full time hours for two weeks only!!!!! She is now also using tax payers money to try and avoid just two weeks work. How long will it be before the penny drops that after so long out of work, perhaps no one in her field actually wants her. TBH if she goes to court for something that IMO is trivial (ie just two weeks of getting out of bed early) then I'm not surprised employers don't want her.
Originally posted by Flavian
reply to post by blupblup
Look,if she was just signing on or hadn't been claiming JSA for long, then fair enough - this would be very unjust and wouldn't really make much sense.
However, after a YEAR of "searching" she still hasn't found a job, despite volunteering in her field. As such, if the government decide they want her to do different work experience then what is the problem? Her payment is her JSA.
Originally posted by EvanB
Are some of you guys just thick or plain stupid??
The girl was already volunteering..
The REAL scandal here is POUNDLAND USING TAXPAYERS MONEY FOR LABOUR SO THEY DONT HAVE TO PAY WAGES UNDER THE GUISE OF THERE BEING A NONE EXISTING JOB AT THE END OF A WORK TRIAL!!!
If you was a company who was offered money and free labour wouldnt you not snap it up??
Originally posted by JiggyPotamus
I am sitting here shaking my head at the ignorance I am seeing. She feels entitled, she's stuck-up, etc. I am just going to assume NONE of you actually read the article and objectively pondered the case. Would you suck it up and go to work for NO paycheck?
Originally posted by XXXN3O
Well I can certainly see how a business has trading results such as this, especially if they are getting workers that do not need to be paid a salary...
Poundland's profits up 122% (2008)
Poundland profit leaps 47 percent (2009)
Poundland's annual profits soared by 130% to £19.8m (2010)
Poundland profits up by more than 80% (2011)
Bear in mind that jobseekers allowance (that the woman received) comes in at £53.45-a-week. I cannot find how many hours she was asked to do but if it were a typical full-time work placement that would be the equivalent of £1.53 per hour. What is the point in having a minimum wage?
From a lot of the replies in this thread I think that the minute benefits are mentioned people simply see red and post tripe rather than actually looking at the facts.
Remember that for the first six months of unemployment the payments you receive come from your own tax payments made in the past.
Here is the link to the article, the opening post appears to have a broken link...
It is my human right not to work for Poundland: Graduate who faced losing benefit sues ministers
Originally posted by woodwardjnr
reply to post by just1cornell0
The government should not be subsidising Pound Land or any other private company with cheap labour. Now I have no problem with people being made to do some work in their communities, voluntary services and charities. Things taking a hit in these times, but to exploit people for private gain is morally wrong however you want to dress it up.
Originally posted by blupblup
Originally posted by Flavian
reply to post by blupblup
Look,if she was just signing on or hadn't been claiming JSA for long, then fair enough - this would be very unjust and wouldn't really make much sense.
However, after a YEAR of "searching" she still hasn't found a job, despite volunteering in her field. As such, if the government decide they want her to do different work experience then what is the problem? Her payment is her JSA.
But is she guaranteed work after this?
If not, then what difference does it make where she volunteers?
Let's say that this becomes a regular thing ok.... Let's say companies start getting free labour in this way, they have all of those on JSA working at poundland, tesco, morrisons, argos and wherever else the government decides.
Let's say they start doing 3 month placements with these companies.
All this will do is force more people out of work...
If poundland can get free workers from the government and money to train them, then why would they hire paid full time workers???
Companies will get wind of this scheme and before you know it, companies wont be hiring as much, they'll be using the free labour the government provides to staff their shops.
This isn't just a case of lazy people who don't want to work being put to good use.
There are other issues at play here....
Originally posted by Flavian
No, because in the long run that would not benefit the economy so would not be pursued as a policy by any government. This is a short term thing for those out of work for a while, not those newly unemployed.
I take the point you are making - it could indeed be seen as sinister but the practicalities would forbid this ever becoming practice long term.
Also, and let's be fair here, the work experience she was doing was not getting her any jobs. The government are basically forcing her to expand her skill set and that can only be to her benefit long term.
Originally posted by Flavian
reply to post by ldyserenity
Why should graduates be last on the list? Now that really does make me mad. Does having a degree make you a better person?.
Originally posted by Flavian
reply to post by blupblup
I understand your point but surely say cleaning part time for £120 per week is better than claiming JSA? And she would still have time to do volunteer work at the museum. Win-win for her. But instead of this, she moans and hires a lawyer claiming her Human Rights have been abused which is a gross and offensive over exaggeration.
She cannot possibly claim there is no work at all to be had - visits to the Jobcentre prove that to be untrue. There is plenty of part time work available all around the country. It may not be the best wage but it is better than claiming the dole at the end of the day.
Originally posted by ldyserenity
Can I ask all the people on this thread who are in the UK how much do the welfare ghetto mama's take home per month, and further, are they expected to take "voluteer" jobs or even look for work? Are they sanctioned for anything? This is a serious question.
Because to me this whole thing seems slanted/ discriminatory against a certain class of people, people with intelligence and a degree and probably White...just my impression it seems to me they're trying to break down a certain group's hopes and kick em while they're down, jmho.