It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Media Reacts To Conan's Same-Sex Wedding News

page: 1
25
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:
+8 more 
posted on Nov, 4 2011 @ 08:54 AM
link   
Hey guys!

Just wanted to share this one with you. It's probably a one of the best examples of blatant media control I've ever seen! It's also farking hilarious! =)



My take on it: Well, it's not at all surprising at all that most news outlets read a controlled script. However, I've never seen that much repetition edited together like that. It was really funny... but rather sad at the same time. It's like they're not even trying anymore.

As for the same-sex marriage thing... I say good for him! He obviously considers his co-workers as respectable human beings regardless of their sexual orientation, and he's using his media spotlight to help them out. I think that's a pretty decent wedding gift from your boss!

I love my girlfriend... She's fantastic! I'm sure there are plenty of others on here who feel the same way about their significant other. These two gentlemen in the video feel the same way about each other... It's such a great feeling! I just want to ask those who are against same sex marriage: why? In a world that needs so much more love, how can you logically be against this?



posted on Nov, 4 2011 @ 09:00 AM
link   
Uh-oh...I can feel everyone's Bible being opened and being mis-construed! I have no problems with gay marriage, just like I have no problems with gay lunch, gay cars, gay movies, gay socks, gay pencils, gay computers, etc. You see where I'm going with this right? It is just marriage, lose the "gay".



posted on Nov, 4 2011 @ 09:03 AM
link   

Originally posted by superman2012
It is just marriage, lose the "gay".


Haha! Ridiculously well said!! =)



posted on Nov, 4 2011 @ 09:05 AM
link   
reply to post by oaf21
 


Haha, thanks, it just seems that you have to be waaay over the top to get people's attention and to get them to think about things! Thanks for bringing this subject up again, nothing wrong with any type of mutual love.



posted on Nov, 4 2011 @ 09:06 AM
link   
That form of repetition is classic to programs "programming" you. The exact same this is going on with the Micheal Jackson trial, with the term all stations are using which is "This Is It", see if you can catch it.

S&F
Peace, NRE.


+6 more 
posted on Nov, 4 2011 @ 09:07 AM
link   
reply to post by superman2012
 


You can't lose the gay because marriage is DEFINED as the union of a MAN and WOMAN in holy matrimony. So anything other than that must have a different name. If words mean what you want them to mean then all the dictionaries on Earth are pointless. Man and man or woman and woman can't marry by definition. Period.



posted on Nov, 4 2011 @ 09:10 AM
link   
reply to post by oaf21
 


Looks like Conan O'Brian may be about to push the envelope on late night television.



posted on Nov, 4 2011 @ 09:11 AM
link   
reply to post by Ookie
 


Wait... so it's Websters' that defines everything now??? I thought it was the Bible...

I'm confused...



posted on Nov, 4 2011 @ 09:15 AM
link   
This is a perfect reason why I don't trust the media on TV these days. So blatant and obvious that the media is controlled by someone.



posted on Nov, 4 2011 @ 09:17 AM
link   
Gay couples should be free to enter into the same sort of church run slave contracts as straight people.

Marriage, being the worst contract a man can enter into, should not be limited to straight men. Gay men should also be able to shackle themselves to each other and then provide income for lawyers to flock down and divide assets when their "marriage" fails, just like happens to straight folks.

In the old days of Feudal marriage contracts, the man and woman would literally be tied to one another during the ceremony, by the priest. He would wrap cords around their arms, linking them to each other. This from a group of men who themselves are very gay, and yet are never allowed to get married! Haha, funny stuff.

Humans are so cute. Utterly loveable, in all their ways and silliness-es.



posted on Nov, 4 2011 @ 09:18 AM
link   
This begs the question... Is it pronounced ON-velope or IN-velope?



Originally posted by superman2012
It is just marriage, lose the "gay".


When marriage is equally offered to gay people, then we can ALL drop the "gay".


Hilarious video! And good for Conan!



posted on Nov, 4 2011 @ 09:19 AM
link   
haha CoCo you done it agian i love how this guiys show the elites for what thay are...SILLY lol makeing all the news casters read the same thing ! somebody doing a documetry should save this clip realy its clasic



posted on Nov, 4 2011 @ 09:22 AM
link   
I dont really mind it when people of the same sex bond...but i have a limit. Somethings in this world are unnatural. Just because we can reason and come up with concepts such as love and marriage doesn't mean sexual relations that cannot procreate are justified. They are unnatural according to nature ( what we have observed).I am not a christian or religious, but perversion is perversion.

People of the same sex can make a commitment to each other. That's ok but anything more than that is unnatural



posted on Nov, 4 2011 @ 09:23 AM
link   
reply to post by LiveEquation
 





Just because we can reason and come up with concepts such as love and marriage doesn't mean sexual relations that cannot procreate are justified.


I assume that you only have sex to make children?



posted on Nov, 4 2011 @ 09:26 AM
link   
reply to post by TsukiLunar
 


If you knew your biology and why nature makes sex so attractive and stimulating, you wouldnt ask such a lame question
edit on 4-11-2011 by LiveEquation because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 4 2011 @ 09:28 AM
link   

Originally posted by LiveEquation
I dont really mind it when people of the same sex bond...but i have a limit. Somethings in this world are unnatural. Just because we can reason and come up with concepts such as love and marriage doesn't mean sexual relations that cannot procreate are justified. They are unnatural according to nature ( what we have observed).I am not a christian or religious, but perversion is perversion.

People of the same sex can make a commitment to each other. That's ok but anything more than that is unnatural


Excellent! Someone actually 'discussing' and respectfully giving they're opinion! Much appreciated! Star for you! =)

However, to that I would say limiting love (in the 'life partner sense') to someone with whom you can only procreate is a perversion in itself. Love knows no limits or boundaries and can evolve just like people can evolve. I see the inclusion of same sex partners as part of that evolution.

As for calling it unnatural, I'd like to see these studies that have proven it to be unnatural. Hell, just last weekend I saw 'proof' that it is indeed very natural when my cousin's two male dogs were mounting each other! So even at a raw animal level, the 'attraction' occurs. They may not understand it, but something instinctual in one of the dogs convinced him to mount the other one.



posted on Nov, 4 2011 @ 09:31 AM
link   
It's EN-velope



And wow.... that is awful, all reading the SAME line.... shocking and sheesh, couldn't they come up with something else??



posted on Nov, 4 2011 @ 09:33 AM
link   
reply to post by LiveEquation
 





If you knew your biology and why nature makes sex so attractive and stimulating, you wouldnt ask such a lame question


Ah, touche'. Then its okay for you to have recreational sex as long as you can, at some point, impregnate the woman even if that's not the intention, but gays cant because because they cant get pregnant?

What a lousy argument. Be ashamed.



posted on Nov, 4 2011 @ 09:34 AM
link   
The gaylesbianqueer fad is not for me......to decide whether it is right or wrong, that is for the Creator(s) to decide. My purpose is to give spread love to all walks of Life. I have read the Bible thrice and the one thing that sticks to my Mind is "he who is without sin, cast the first stone". I have never met ANYONE who has the right to do so.


 
Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com
 



posted on Nov, 4 2011 @ 09:35 AM
link   
reply to post by oaf21
 


well love is an idea, a concept. Because of Love is associated with how you feel...it is subject to change. A commitment on the other hand makes feelings irrelevant. Love is a chemistry ( a chemistry nature intended to promote sex and diversity). Those dogs you saw are nothing new, animals do that when it is time for them to mate. What your friend should have done is bring a female so they could act on their drive.

You fail to understand the difference between love and commitment. They are not the same thing



new topics

top topics



 
25
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join