Is the Canadian government officially tracking down and registering extraterrestrial beings??

Short answer: No.

reply to post by snowspirit


Kelowna you say? I live up the valley in Vernon. Cops here wouldn't even care, they would probably say hello and walk away. Im more worried about when the ET's try and land on American government owned land and get shot the hell out of thus sparking an extermination campaign.

Originally posted by AaronWilson
reply to post by snowspirit

 

Kelowna you say? I live up the valley in Vernon. Cops here wouldn't even care, they would probably say hello and walk away. Im more worried about when the ET's try and land on American government owned land and get shot the hell out of thus sparking an extermination campaign.

There's been a documentary type show about some abductees on a couple of times, can't remember the name of it though, and the highway between Kelowna and Vernon, was where they found themselves missing some time.

I found the story here
the-v-factor-paranormal.blogspot.com...

Originally posted by phishyblankwaters
reply to post by superman2012

 

Edit: what I am saying is that these are examples on how to use ARCS and ORCS...not actual articles.

lol i'm not the one claiming these are real, I merely wanted to confirm they are hosted on the government site and are searchable from outside users, which they are. the document is shoddy and half-assedly put together.

Actually I wouldn't be surprised to find spelling mistakes if I took the time to read the entire document.

Anyways, to answer another users question, this document is dated 2011 and is a revised edition as the old "superseeded" edition is still present but out of date.

I really can't wait to see this story spread because no one will bother to vet the information. some university summer student temp is probably going to half a laugh when they get wind of this.

The www2.gov.bc.ca site is the official government site. This one is the ministry of labor: www.gov.bc.ca... its also an official site. Just follow these links: citz iao arcs/admin arcs_orcs_user_guide.pdf

I know. I needed to verify two things:

The pdf was actually hosted there not a tricky url redirect. It is hosted there.
The pdf was accessible from an outside, non government, user. It is and is searchable through the database.

This does nothing to prove the legitimacy of the document, which I still call into question.

Seriously, I could right now upload any document to the official government of New Brunswick website and send you a link. i won't, but I could.

edit on 25-10-2011 by phishyblankwaters because: (no reason given)

Sorry about that. I didn't mean to reply to your post, just a general post. I didn't mean to accuse you of believing this crap.

reply to post by phishyblankwaters


Lol the governemnt has higher standards wow, thats really funny, thats just the best quote of the day thanks

Originally posted by Blarneystoner

Originally posted by 1AnunnakiBastard

Originally posted by Blarneystoner

Originally posted by 1AnunnakiBastard
reply to post by 1AnunnakiBastard

 

In the same discussion someone embedded another link for a document of US Navy, entitled NAVAL ASTRONAUT DESIGNATION, which contains the following paragraph:

2. Qualifications.

Naval Astronaut qualifications for Pilots and Specialists are:

a. Naval and Marine officers trained, qualified, and certified to

• fly (pilots) a powered vehicle designed for flight above 50 miles from the earth’s surface, and/or

• serve as a mission specialist on a powered vehicle designed for flight above 50 miles from the earth’s surface as defined by CNO (see reference (a)) and/or CMC, as appropriate.

b. Have completed a minimum of one flight as a pilot or mission specialist on an extraterrestrial vehicle in a flight above 50 miles from the earth’s surface.

www.public.navy.mil...

Be my guest to analyze the content of these docs...

I'm pretty sure "extraterrestrial vehicle" in this case simply means any vehicle capable of leaving earth's gravity/atmosphere... of course I could be wrong but "extraterrestrial vehicle" doesn't have to mean a vehicle of extraterrestrial origin.

Great find on the Canadian ET database though... S&F for you.

The US military refer to vehicle capable of leaving Earth's gravity/atmosphere, as TAVs "Transatmosphere Vehicles", not as "extraterrestrial vehicles".

LOL... apparently not in THIS document. If you look at the first requirement it says:

a. Naval and Marine officers trained, qualified, and certified to:

• fly (pilots) a powered vehicle designed for flight
above 50 miles from the earth’s surface, and/or

• serve as a mission specialist on a powered vehicle
designed for flight above 50 miles from the earth’s
surface

Clearly the term "extraterrestrial vehicle" in this document refers to "a powered vehicle designed for flight above 50 miles from the earth’s surface."

You're grasping at straws.... trying to find something that just isn't there.

edit on 25-10-2011 by Blarneystoner because: (no reason given)

I don't know how classes of syntax grammar did you miss in school, but the paragraph is using TWO sub-items for referring to TWO different designations:

a. Naval and Marine officers trained, qualified, and certified to

• fly (pilots) a powered vehicle designed for flight above 50 miles from the earth’s surface, and/or
• serve as a mission specialist on a powered vehicle designed for flight above 50 miles from the earth’s surface as defined by CNO (see reference (a)) and/or CMC, as appropriate.

b. Have completed a minimum of one flight as a pilot or mission specialist on an extraterrestrial vehicle in a flight above 50 miles from the earth’s surface.

www.public.navy.mil...

Any person used to write official docs would just fit the content of "b" designation in the "a" designation, for avoid redundancy, if it was referring to the SAME vehicle.

Not sure if anyone else caught this or not but in the document from the Canadian government, the quoted text is under a heading called "Sample Primary to Illustrate ARCS". Learn to research before you post secondary links.

Originally posted by Ryanssuperman
Not sure if anyone else caught this or not but in the document from the Canadian government, the quoted text is under a heading called "Sample Primary to Illustrate ARCS". Learn to research before you post secondary links.

I'm having a hard time figuring out how the word "illustrate" debunks this document. I don't see the words "hypothesis", "hypothetical" or "fictional" anywhere in those docs. The fact that the former Defense Minister of Canada, Paul Hellyer, spilled the beans about the presence of aliens on Earth and cover up of governments led by USA, doesn't help you shills either.

The people that believe this is a leaked document could always go to the parent index and see that it is a guide (even though Isaac already pointed it out as a sample...)



Parent Directory

About ARCS

ARCS Overview
What is ARCS, its purpose, and the difference between administrative and operational records

ARCS/ORCS User Guide
How to read a primary, plus a brief explanation of ARCS and ORCS (replaces old “How to Use” section)

Canadians... We have a sense of humour.

As much as I would like to believe, I think in this instance, it was merely used as an example to make otherwise very dry material vaguely entertaining.

Originally posted by 1AnunnakiBastard

Originally posted by Ryanssuperman
Not sure if anyone else caught this or not but in the document from the Canadian government, the quoted text is under a heading called "Sample Primary to Illustrate ARCS". Learn to research before you post secondary links.

I'm having a hard time figuring out how the word "illustrate" debunks this document. I don't see the words "hypothesis", "hypothetical" or "fictional" anywhere in those docs. The fact that the former Defense Minister of Canada, Paul Hellyer, spilled the beans about the presence of aliens on Earth and cover up of governments led by USA, doesn't help you shills either.

Oooo I got called a shill! I've always wondered if I'd get that designation in a reply one day. Awesome! But seriously, the wording clearly shows its used as a SAMPLE to ILLUSTRATE how ARCS are presented and read. Denying that fact, and playing with semantics, just makes you look moronic.

Originally posted by Ryanssuperman

Originally posted by 1AnunnakiBastard

Originally posted by Ryanssuperman
Not sure if anyone else caught this or not but in the document from the Canadian government, the quoted text is under a heading called "Sample Primary to Illustrate ARCS". Learn to research before you post secondary links.

I'm having a hard time figuring out how the word "illustrate" debunks this document. I don't see the words "hypothesis", "hypothetical" or "fictional" anywhere in those docs. The fact that the former Defense Minister of Canada, Paul Hellyer, spilled the beans about the presence of aliens on Earth and cover up of governments led by USA, doesn't help you shills either.

Oooo I got called a shill! I've always wondered if I'd get that designation in a reply one day. Awesome! But seriously, the wording clearly shows its used as a SAMPLE to ILLUSTRATE how ARCS are presented and read. Denying that fact, and playing with semantics, just makes you look moronic.

You are the one who say that a document of Canadian government is using the subject extraterrestrial visitation only to "illustrate" a brief about classification of data, after the former Defense Minister opened up about this very same government knowing a lot about the presence of extraterrestrials on Earth, and I'm the one who looks moronic???

Do you REALLY call yourself "Ryanssuperman"???

reply to post by 1AnunnakiBastard


Well, you are insinuating that the Canadian Government has a "secret" program where they track and monitor aliens yet in their grand wisdom, accidentally? posted that information on their website, in a section that outlines how boring papers are composed/read.

Originally posted by 1AnunnakiBastard

Originally posted by Ryanssuperman

Originally posted by 1AnunnakiBastard

Originally posted by Ryanssuperman
Not sure if anyone else caught this or not but in the document from the Canadian government, the quoted text is under a heading called "Sample Primary to Illustrate ARCS". Learn to research before you post secondary links.

I'm having a hard time figuring out how the word "illustrate" debunks this document. I don't see the words "hypothesis", "hypothetical" or "fictional" anywhere in those docs. The fact that the former Defense Minister of Canada, Paul Hellyer, spilled the beans about the presence of aliens on Earth and cover up of governments led by USA, doesn't help you shills either.

Oooo I got called a shill! I've always wondered if I'd get that designation in a reply one day. Awesome! But seriously, the wording clearly shows its used as a SAMPLE to ILLUSTRATE how ARCS are presented and read. Denying that fact, and playing with semantics, just makes you look moronic.

You are the one who say that a document of Canadian government is using the subject extraterrestrial visitation only to "illustrate" a brief about classification of data, after the former Defense Minister opened up about this very same government knowing a lot about the presence of extraterrestrials on Earth, and I'm the one who looks moronic???

Do you REALLY call yourself "Ryanssuperman"???

edit on 10/25/2011 by 1AnunnakiBastard because: (no reason given)

I'm not going to turn this into an argument, like you apparently want it to be "1Anunnakibastard". However, it says in the heading of the quote you posted re: ET's, that it is a "Sample Primary to Illustrate ARCS". Whether that's just a "cover" for actual procedure is another story. However, you purposely left out, and are denying the fact, that that heading exists. We're not going into what the ex DM of Canada came clean with here.

Not to mention they use the word "body-snatching". Its very clearly an example of an ARCS, with a bit of humor.

Look at the paper, and use common sense.

Holy crap...are people just stupid or what...

It was being used as a freaking sample...as many other posters have pointed out....GEEEZ.

Should this be considered a hoax...since OP never mentioned in title that it was a sample of a procedure?

It's clearly stated numerous times that its an example. So what's with all the grasping from 1Annunakibastard lol

Originally posted by TinkerHaus
reply to post by 1AnunnakiBastard

 

2.2 Records relating to the registration of extraterrestrial visitors to the province. An extraterrestrial is any sentient being originating from another planet, regardless of appearance or ancestry. Extraterrestrials are registered and tracked to ensure they do not contravene federal and provincial legislation by attempting world domination, body-snatching, or other anti-democratic activities. Registrants must provide identifying information and report regularly to the ministry liaison assigned. Record types include registration forms, reference materials, photographs, videotapes, correspondence, memoranda, and reports.

Haha! It's good to know the Canadian Government is doing their part to protect us from body snatching and other "anti-democratic" activities! Tommy Lee was great in this, as always!

If the document is real, they acknowledge body snatching is possible!
If it is possible, how many people walking around are really aliens that have snatched someones body? I wonder if it is like Stargate where it's more like a symbiotic relationship between the host and symbiode or does the alien take over the host completely?

Originally posted by kerazeesicko
Holy crap...are people just stupid or what...

It was being used as a freaking sample...as many other posters have pointed out....GEEEZ

.

Should this be considered a hoax...since OP never mentioned in title that it was a sample of a procedure?

Way to kill an entertaining thread.

Originally posted by GringoViejo
Short answer: No.

Amen. It just goes to show how completely lame ATS has become that this sort of fabricated junk actually is worthy of posting.

But I love the idea of creating totally fake government "information" just to keep the people who have no ability to discern reality from a complete fabricated hoax separate. Gee. It is like the dang aliens just keep us entertained by making us invent all this nonsense.

I don't think our governments are competent enough to register extraterrestrials, assuming they were indeed travelling to our star system in the first place. If they have that capabilty, it would certainly fall on deaf ears.
like a worm pleading to an eagle.

Sure they can keep us stuck in their system, because we are only human, but trying to register aliens just sounds funny.
They far exceed our norms in all aspects of living. Yes it's our planet, but it could be THEIR universe..