Obamas 3 years of Classwarfare has Paid Off

Originally posted by illuminatislave
The fact that Sanders was even remotely linked to that corporatist pig Obama(since clearly the OP and other posters have no basic understanding of what a socialist is compared to Barack's actions) shows that this thread is nothing more than a troll post that reeks of ignorance.

For the 1000th time, even your god and savior Ron Paul has said that Obama is not a socialist, but a corporatist. Read a bloody book instead of regurgitating whatever bull# Rush spews into your ear canals.

And he has waged class warfare alright...look at who his policies have hurt the most. Look who has taken the hardest hit during his term. And you're in here like little lapdogs, whining over the "poor" elite of this country.

It's #ing pathetic. I'd love to see the bank books of some of the people screaming that he's waging class warfare against the rich. Wall Street has made out like bandits. Record profits from major corporations, while small business goes into the toilet. Yeah, that Obama is really killing those blessed job creators, who won't create jobs since the free trade agreements they paid off the government to enact have made it easier for them to find cheap slave labor elsewhere.

Get over yourselves, you sound foolish.

I really tire of people who are pro socialist say that anti socialist just dont know what socialism is and that's why they oppose it. Lol so silly.
Obama and his class warfare tactics have nothing to do with my bankbook other than he's stealing from it via govt payoffs to his Union friends and supporters.

reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus


you know thats hilarious that socialism clearly has anti social ways and means the destruction of a group for the betterment of the whole never deleivering on those promises.

Originally posted by sweetliberty
Many Americans understand what the repercussions of this "tax the rich" agenda will reap onto the small business owners and their employees.

Obama talks about "millionaires and billionaires", that they need to "pay their fair share"... ect...keeping the focus narrow and direct but the picture is much larger than taxing the "rich".

Since when are businesses who make 250k a year a "millionaire"? These business are the bread and butter for many workers. Isn't obamacare going to be enough? EPA? FDA?

We have a class-A food stamp president who has sold his soul to the devil so that American's are on their knee's and dependent on the few who are powerful and rich.
It's amazing to see how he can utter a few words, rinse and repeat, then he sits back in amusement as to how easy it is to control the unhappy, emotional, gimme-gimme fools who fear someone is getting away with something... let's punish them/judge them and destroy them, no matter who else gets destroyed in the process.

I call this (class warfare) the "misery loves company" crowd, who can't control their emotions long enough to think of the consequences if their tantrums are successful.

Our foodstamp-in-chief began his "group-warfare" agenda from day one. Religion, race, sexual preferences, incomes, ect.
Divide and conquer.

The elections are too far away

You don't seem to realize that people are not following Obama, they are opposing the alternative.

The alternative that advocates re institution of the deregulatory process that set up this long chain of

events.

Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus

 

you know thats hilarious that socialism clearly has anti social ways and means the destruction of a group for the betterment of the whole never deleivering on those promises.

Well, people who buy into the philosophy don't realize the loss of personal freedom that goes along with the Totalitarian ways of the socialist collectivism. I am just flabbergasted by people who say they are not socialist or communist, but that they are anarchist who believe in abolition of private property. What do these people think they are supporting when they support the very groups who are the most Totalitarian in nature?

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus

Originally posted by illuminatislave
The fact that Sanders was even remotely linked to that corporatist pig Obama(since clearly the OP and other posters have no basic understanding of what a socialist is compared to Barack's actions) shows that this thread is nothing more than a troll post that reeks of ignorance.

For the 1000th time, even your god and savior Ron Paul has said that Obama is not a socialist, but a corporatist. Read a bloody book instead of regurgitating whatever bull# Rush spews into your ear canals.

And he has waged class warfare alright...look at who his policies have hurt the most. Look who has taken the hardest hit during his term. And you're in here like little lapdogs, whining over the "poor" elite of this country.

It's #ing pathetic. I'd love to see the bank books of some of the people screaming that he's waging class warfare against the rich. Wall Street has made out like bandits. Record profits from major corporations, while small business goes into the toilet. Yeah, that Obama is really killing those blessed job creators, who won't create jobs since the free trade agreements they paid off the government to enact have made it easier for them to find cheap slave labor elsewhere.

Get over yourselves, you sound foolish.

I really tire of people who are pro socialist say that anti socialist just dont know what socialism is and that's why they oppose it. Lol so silly.
Obama and his class warfare tactics have nothing to do with my bankbook other than he's stealing from it via govt payoffs to his Union friends and supporters.

edit on 3-10-2011 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)

It's not about socialism, its about addressing the cronyism that taints government and pillages America bank accounts.

You guys are gonna fall on the wrong side of this thing, you'll see.

We have been royally screwed by both political parties. There is no difference until we get rid of them all and elect new people.

People can continue this back and forth as willing stooges for both Parties or wake up.

Obama had complete control of the government for two years and what did he do?

Obama - Bush - Clinton - Bush Senior ................ all the same people. It's a game and yet so many are so naive.

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus


Well, people who buy into the philosophy don't realize the loss of personal freedom that goes along with the Totalitarian ways of the socialist collectivism. I am just flabbergasted by people who say they are not socialist or communist, but that they are anarchist who believe in abolition of private property. What do these people think they are supporting when they support the very groups who are the most Totalitarian in nature?

You are talking about a small fringe element, just like the fringe element of the Tea Party that
wanted to over throw the government.

Tell me what loss of personal freedom?

reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus


they support their very own destruction and have their hands out going

yes can i have some please.

thats why i said its distrubing thats what has transpired the past 2 weeks and the past 3 years.

same thing just a slightly hipper rap than still ends up at annihilaition.

Originally posted by Blaine91555
We have been royally screwed by both political parties. There is no difference until we get rid of them all and elect new people.

People can continue this back and forth as willing stooges for both Parties or wake up.

Obama had complete control of the government for two years and what did he do?

Obama - Bush - Clinton - Bush Senior ................ all the same people. It's a game and yet so many are so naive.

edit on 10/3/2011 by Blaine91555 because: (no reason given)

I really agree with you Blaine, both parties are controlled by the CFR and the Shadow Party. Both parties have members in CFR and Bilderbergs. the NWO has infiltrated every industry and media outlet.

Originally posted by mastahunta

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus


Well, people who buy into the philosophy don't realize the loss of personal freedom that goes along with the Totalitarian ways of the socialist collectivism. I am just flabbergasted by people who say they are not socialist or communist, but that they are anarchist who believe in abolition of private property. What do these people think they are supporting when they support the very groups who are the most Totalitarian in nature?

You are talking about a small fringe element, just like the fringe element of the Tea Party that
wanted to over throw the government.

Tell me what loss of personal freedom?

When did you ever hear a Tea Partier talking about overthrowing govt? No one got busted at any Tea Parties, except those Obama supporter SEIU thugs who beat up the guy in St. Louis. and they were the opposition obviously.
Tea Partiers joined the Town Hall meetings and talked with their representatives, so please tell me what was the overthrowing govt part?
Signs that asked Congress to stop the mad spending? Was that overthrowing govt? cmon guy get real. You have always sounded like a BO supporter to me and seem to defend everything he does.

reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus


It's the old divide to control ploy that has worked all throughout history. Create a perceived enemy, incite hate and sit back and watch everyone defeat themselves.

I think lots of us here understand that simple tactic. Stalin, Mao, Hitler and many others used it very effectively. Look at how Hitlers tactic of demonizing the Jews has carried on generations later. It is truly sad.

If we all ever paid attention and joined together it would be all over for the bad guys. No government can stand up to a united people. Question is, how do we unite after decades of orchestrated hate dividing us? I don't know any answer to that one. People are too easily manipulated.

I've gone from the Left to the Right and back again until I woke up and realized what is really going on.

Look at this tax the rich thing. Any extra taxes are simply added to the cost of goods and services and always have been. It's all a game. Those who provide the goods and services have to make a profit to survive and they actually have no choice but to base pricing on their costs.

The last thing on earth either Party wishes to do is reign in spending. It takes away their power. To them, power over us is a drug and it's more important than money.

reply to post by mastahunta

You don't seem to realize that people are not following Obama, they are opposing the alternative. The alternative that advocates re institution of the deregulatory process that set up this long chain of events.

I feel I understand that part of it but what is happening to us is creating a feel-good mob rules mentality.
What I hear out there and here on ATS is more much more than the alternative.
What isn't going to "spread" is the "wealth". What will spread is division and hatred among people who see things in a different light.
What's spreading is the bully mentality. No compromising.

@Blaine91555: What you say is very true. Bush, I mean Obama has simply accelerated the power and control over us. He and his buddies are working overtime on us.

Those who decide with emotions instead of logic are only making it easier for the power grubbers tighten their hold.

It's just a matter of time before everything escalates if the bullies aren't catered to.

Originally posted by Blaine91555
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus

 

It's the old divide to control ploy that has worked all throughout history. Create a perceived enemy, incite hate and sit back and watch everyone defeat themselves.

Exactly what Third Eye of Horus is engaging in...

reply to post by neo96


His plan is definitely working!!

Another proud first for Obama. Wonder why he isn't bragging about these numbers?? That's right.. His goal is to get hit $50 million on the food stamp tit. The more the merrier.

Food Stamp Use reaches record level.

Originally posted by Blaine91555
It takes away their power. To them, power over us is a drug and it's more important than money.

edit on 10/3/2011 by Blaine91555 because: (no reason given)

Their power is in Wall Street, who do you think funds the political campaigns?

You want the power transferred into private hands, so the power can never be questioned
or challenged.

We recently learned from Forbes that the wealthiest 400 Americans net worth is 1.6 trillion while the bottom 150 million Americans net worth is 1.5 trillion. Is it really class warfare to point out the wealth inequality in this country wen it's gotten this bad or mention the that fact that the wealthiest Americas are in no way suffering under a huge tax burden. That they could easily afford to pay a higher tax rate that is still lower than what it was during the Reagan administration.

By the way, less than 2% of American families earn more than $250k. They aren't exactly middle class when the median family income is 50k.

obama is right. rich people are irresponsible with their money. some of them have 14 bentley's in their driveways and 8 unoccupied mansions and 10 luxury condos around the country.

that tells me and the government that they don't care a flying f about their cash. they're squandering it, while the majority of americans have to get buy on a lousy 50k a year.

even if the rich pay 75% on 50 million, that still leaves them with 12.5 million in cash at the end of the year.

i'd love to have that problem.

reply to post by jibeho


yeah and did you read that comment about how well the economy is doing in this thread?

hilarious and yeah it is indeed working about the only thing working in this country at the moment

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus

Originally posted by mastahunta

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus


Well, people who buy into the philosophy don't realize the loss of personal freedom that goes along with the Totalitarian ways of the socialist collectivism. I am just flabbergasted by people who say they are not socialist or communist, but that they are anarchist who believe in abolition of private property. What do these people think they are supporting when they support the very groups who are the most Totalitarian in nature?

You are talking about a small fringe element, just like the fringe element of the Tea Party that
wanted to over throw the government.

Tell me what loss of personal freedom?

When did you ever hear a Tea Partier talking about overthrowing govt? No one got busted at any Tea Parties, except those Obama supporter SEIU thugs who beat up the guy in St. Louis. and they were the opposition obviously.
Tea Partiers joined the Town Hall meetings and talked with their representatives, so please tell me what was the overthrowing govt part?
Signs that asked Congress to stop the mad spending? Was that overthrowing govt? cmon guy get real. You have always sounded like a BO supporter to me and seem to defend everything he does.

edit on 3-10-2011 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)

Ah so this is about political contests, but the Tea Party wasn't about political conquest?

The Tea Party constantly made veiled threats about revolution, they even adopted the characters
and slogans of the revolutionary period. You don't have to lie... On the other hand, I will not say that
the majority of Tea Parties entertained revolution, that is far from the truth.

In an interview this week, Broden was asked if he was actually calling for violence against the government when he told a crowd of Tea Party supporters last year that the "tyrannical" Obama administration might justify a "revolution." If any government destroys our liberty, Broden replied, "we have a right... to get rid of it by any means necessary."

theweek.com...

Enjoy

Originally posted by mastahunta

Originally posted by Blaine91555
It takes away their power. To them, power over us is a drug and it's more important than money.

edit on 10/3/2011 by Blaine91555 because: (no reason given)

Their power is in Wall Street, who do you think funds the political campaigns?

You want the power transferred into private hands, so the power can never be questioned
or challenged.

The Public employee unions and big labor unions in general fund the political campaigns more than Wall Street does. The unions are being manipulated and are subsequently manipulating their members and the money collected through forced dues.

This is just from the 2010 midterms

The American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees is now the biggest outside spender of the 2010 elections, thanks to an 11th-hour effort to boost Democrats that has vaulted the public-sector union ahead of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the AFL-CIO and a flock of new Republican groups in campaign spending.

The 1.6 million-member AFSCME is spending a total of $87.5 million on the elections after tapping into a $16 million emergency account to help fortify the Democrats' hold on Congress. Last week, AFSCME dug deeper, taking out a $2 million loan to fund its push.

Compared to this

News Corp., publisher of The Wall Street Journal, is one of the larger corporate donors on the other side of the ledger, and has donated $1.25 million to the Republican Governors Association and $1 million to the Chamber of Commerce

online.wsj.com...

The reality is quite hair raising.

In fact the top 15 spenders in the 2010 election were Unions. When you combine the 2008 election and the 2010 midterm you will find that Big Labor spent $2.2 Billion in political outlays. That's a big number!!

www.nilrr.org...