It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by defcon5
BTW... If you in a stolen car with an escaped prisoner, your NOT innocent.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by Xcathdra
He had an avenue to escape, but what I'm really interested in now was my other question.
Is it ok that he shot at the car even though there was an innocent passenger that could have been killed?
Originally posted by sonnny1
Originally posted by defcon5
BTW... If you in a stolen car with an escaped prisoner, your NOT innocent.
How about the high speed chase ? Guess she is innocent of that also. Who cares she put law abiding citizens lives in danger. Its the polices fault in that one also,right?
Originally posted by Xcathdra
reply to post by snarfbot
In uniform, telling you to stop, right next to you, and the person doesnt comply, and runs over the deputy in the process. As I said, its not the highway and the speeds arent high.
She knew what she was doing.
Originally posted by Xcathdra
reply to post by snarfbot
In uniform, telling you to stop, right next to you, and the person doesnt comply, and runs over the deputy in the process. As I said, its not the highway and the speeds arent high.
She knew what she was doing.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by sonnny1
If you had a bullet in your body you would drive pretty fast too. So that high speed chase (that the cops lost her on?) that ended at a hospital can be discounted.
Originally posted by snarfbot
Originally posted by Xcathdra
reply to post by snarfbot
In uniform, telling you to stop, right next to you, and the person doesnt comply, and runs over the deputy in the process. As I said, its not the highway and the speeds arent high.
She knew what she was doing.
and that is adequate justification for taking a persons life? not in america.
Originally posted by sonnny1
According to those on here defending her,she has all the rights in the world to be a felon,not face consequences,drive a stolen vehicle,assault LEO's,put other peoples lives in danger,including her passengers. In the end,its the Officers fault for shooting at her,AFTER she hit him with the vehicle. Got it.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by sonnny1
If you had a bullet in your body you would drive pretty fast too. So that high speed chase (that the cops lost her on?) that ended at a hospital can be discounted.
Originally posted by snarfbot
Originally posted by sonnny1
According to those on here defending her,she has all the rights in the world to be a felon,not face consequences,drive a stolen vehicle,assault LEO's,put other peoples lives in danger,including her passengers. In the end,its the Officers fault for shooting at her,AFTER she hit him with the vehicle. Got it.
so they can charge her with the crimes then, and try her in a court. police arent judge jury and executioner.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by Xcathdra
That is absurd!! The passenger could have been anyone. A child. A hostage. You can't just say "well they shouldn't have been in the car with someone that did that." This is the argument I was looking for to show me that you would agree with anyone a cop does without giving it a second thought. Of course it's not ok, that wasn't even a real question.
We do our best to preseve life, however you will find occasions where its not possible.
Originally posted by Xcathdra
Just like a person who is walking in an agresive manner towards a cop with a knife or baseball bat. The cop is justified in drawing their weapon and ordering the person to stop. If the person doesnt stop, the officer can defend themselves by shooting to stop the threat, as was done in this case.