It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by HauntWok
30 years in Washington? Of course he's sold out to the powers that be.
He's just as corrupt as any of them. He does what every politician does, makes you think he's on your side when he's really on the side of the rich and powerful.
Originally posted by RadeonGFXRHumanGTXisAlien
What makes Ron Paul different from any other candidate?
Originally posted by bacci0909
Originally posted by RadeonGFXRHumanGTXisAlien
What makes Ron Paul different from any other candidate?
If you can't figure that out for yourself, then there's no need for any of us to waste our time trying to explain it to you..
Again, I ask.. if Ron Paul were a product of TPTB, then A) why wasn't he elected in 1988 or 2008 and B) why does the media ignore or discredit him? And please don't say "reverse psychology", that's a crock of spit if I've ever heard one. Rick Perry has clearly been groomed, attended Bilderberg in 2007 and (unless for some amazing miracle) is GOING to get the republican nomination.. it's his first time running, he jumped to #1 in the polls within 9 days of announcing his candidacy, and it's because he got the proper push from the media
Originally posted by Swills
Originally posted by HauntWok
30 years in Washington? Of course he's sold out to the powers that be.
He's just as corrupt as any of them. He does what every politician does, makes you think he's on your side when he's really on the side of the rich and powerful.
My last post in this thread says different. Instead of making false accusations & assumptions, why not try to back them up with some sort if evidence?
Go on, get the searching. We'll be waiting.
Originally posted by RadeonGFXRHumanGTXisAlien
Originally posted by SpaDe_
reply to post by RadeonGFXRHumanGTXisAlien
Thank you for your attempted straw man argument. You sir are the OP, and the burden of proof is on you. All you have provided is a roughly thrown together Youtube video that brings no arguable point forward to which Ron Paul could even be construed as a shill.
ETA: Where is the evidence backing up the claim that the Saddam photo even came from an official Ron Paul video? You need to back your claims.edit on 9/4/2011 by SpaDe_ because: (no reason given)
Here's the video, the original video of the Saddam picture subliminally being in the Ron Paul on Bill Mahers "Real time".
It's from 0:36 - 0:40 watch in those frames
Did i break your confirmation bias, or are you still gullible?edit on 4-9-2011 by RadeonGFXRHumanGTXisAlien because: (no reason given)