It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The reason you perceive everyone to be "lying" to you is you fail to read easily written posts.
So Simeon, directed by the Spirit, came into the temple courts, and when the parents brought in the child Jesus to do for him what was customary according to the law,
So the child’s father and mother were amazed at what was said about him
Now Jesus’ parents went to Jerusalem every year for the feast of the Passover.
But when the feast was over, as they were returning home, the boy Jesus stayed behind in Jerusalem. His parents did not know it,
When his parents saw him, they were overwhelmed.
Look, your father and I have been looking for you anxiously.
Yet his parents did not understand the remark he made to them.
Let me qute you from today.
Read that same passage fron the KJB. The clowns at Alexandria removed any reference to the divinity of Christ fro the Textus Sinaticus and Textus Vaticanus that all modern versions rely upon. Westcott and Hort were self-described heretics who denied Christ's divinity too.
Actually, the only Bibles that claim Joseph was the father of Jesus are derived from Westcott and Hort, two unbelievers who rejected the deity of Jesus Christ. The Byzantine text, or Textus Receptus doesn't say Joseph was Jesus's father. The changes were made by those in Alexandria who rejected the divinity of Christ.
Look, your father and I have been looking for you anxiously.
And He said to them, “Why were you looking for me? Did you not know that I must be in my Father's house?”
And they did not understand the saying that he spoke to them.
Lies.
To which Jesus corrects her and tells her His Father is not Joseph, His Father is God and He was in His "Father's house", the temple.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by NOTurTypical
Lies.
To which Jesus corrects her and tells her His Father is not Joseph, His Father is God and He was in His "Father's house", the temple.
You are adding your own words to the Gospel to suite your philosophy.
The Gospel says, Jesus replied, “Why were you looking for me? Didn’t you know that I must be in my Father’s house?”
So the correction was nothing to do with the identity of his father but that he needed to be involved in religious matters, which were the business of his heavenly Father, the same Father of all of us.
Matthew 1:1
This is the record of the genealogy of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham.
This is his bloodline descent. His genetic makeup as a physical human being.
Notice the word, gene, as in genetic.
Jesus was genetically, through Joseph, a descendant of Abraham and David.
The gospel said he was a good man. Joseph was compassionate and caring, Mary came from the most pious and devout family in Judea. God created a perfect man who was resistant to evil as was possible, to take the role of representative of mankind, where Adam failed.
God guided this process of selection from Eve through Mary and from Adam down to Jesus' father from whom the angel may have selected a specific seed. Maybe God planned for Jesus to be born on a specific day, so did not want to wait but took matters into His own hands to get the thing going.
Making Jesus a genetic descendant of God is to throw out all religion which apparently is your stated goal.edit on 13-8-2011 by jmdewey60 because: (no reason given)
Are you a Gnostic now?
The genealogy is only important in order to fulfill prophecy.
Jesus was conceived by the holy spirit, not through the union of flesh.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by NOTurTypical
I'm not the one who is saying Jesus was created.
The person that Jesus was before becoming a man had always been around, as far as I am concerned.
You can't make up rules for God. God does things that we can't understand.
Saying Joseph can not be the genetic father of Jesus is putting your own restrictions on God.
God in the Flesh is a slogan. It's not in the Bible. There is something like that in the KJV, in 1Timothy 3:16 but not in the modern versions. It says God was manifest in the flesh. It doesn't even fit into the phrase and the modern versions have it as He was manifest in the flesh, meaning Jesus was, and that does fit into the phrase.
There is no warnings (in the NT) against people not claiming the deity of Jesus but more like the opposite, which is people who deny the humanity of Jesus. There is no reason for Jesus being a deity in order to be our savior and all the reasons why he has to be one of us to save us. This idea that God had to sacrifice Himself in order to be an effective atonement is wrong in more than one way. It is another slogan with no biblical support. That's why there are slogans, so that people accept them as truth, just from repetition.
edit on 13-8-2011 by jmdewey60 because: (no reason given)
Take those feelings and move on them to repent of your sorcery and turn to the real God.
You are so far off base it is embarrassing.
You make me cringe.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by XplanetX
Take those feelings and move on them to repent of your sorcery and turn to the real God.
You are so far off base it is embarrassing.
You make me cringe.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by XplanetX
Paul is talking about people trying to perpetuate the old Jewish system where they identified themselves as to their linage from whatever tribe. He was not talking about the Gospels and the genealogy of Jesus. Paul is talking about things like the Talmud and other stories that were created to explain various things in Hebrew history.
What I was getting at a little while ago is that your sorcery is failing you and you should realize you are not fighting me but the word because you deny the Bible to support philosophy which you can not defend.
This verse you quoted here would be an example.
So exactly where does it say in the bible that Jesus was not conceived by the holy spirit?
MT 1:20 But after he had considered this, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream and said, "Joseph son of David, do not be afraid to take Mary home as your wife, because what is conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit. She will give birth to a son, and you are to give him the name Jesus, because he will save his people from their sins."
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by XplanetX
This verse you quoted here would be an example.
So exactly where does it say in the bible that Jesus was not conceived by the holy spirit?
MT 1:20 But after he had considered this, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream and said, "Joseph son of David, do not be afraid to take Mary home as your wife, because what is conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit. She will give birth to a son, and you are to give him the name Jesus, because he will save his people from their sins."
All it is saying is that this fetus or whatever developing inside her is there because of the Holy Spirit, which would mean that it was not from her doing unholy things.
Exactly.
Jesus was not born through the union of flesh.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by XplanetX
Exactly.
Jesus was not born through the union of flesh.
You are not defining anything.
What is union and what is flesh?
So you just play a game of insinuation.
I defined my terms earlier so according to my definition, it was.
Fleshly but not sinful.
You apparently have a strong aversion to explaining anything.
So all I can expect back is nanananana. Or something equally enlightening.
Just turn all that you just said and apply it to yourself because it does not apply to me.
Your credibility is now nonexistent. I have shown you a scripture that states Jesus was conceived by the holy spirit and you have twisted that to suit your own philosophy.
Stop twisting something that is very easy to understand. You obviously have a pre-conceived idea on this subject and even when confronted with scripture that contradicts your theory, you cling on due to your own ego.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by XplanetX
Just turn all that you just said and apply it to yourself because it does not apply to me.
Your credibility is now nonexistent. I have shown you a scripture that states Jesus was conceived by the holy spirit and you have twisted that to suit your own philosophy.
Stop twisting something that is very easy to understand. You obviously have a pre-conceived idea on this subject and even when confronted with scripture that contradicts your theory, you cling on due to your own ego.
I am not following a cult guide book on what to believe, you do.
Your only argument is, "it is something easy to understand."
Right, it is according to my explanation.
You don't have an explanation so by definition there is nothing to understand.
You just say I am wrong.
I am reading the verse as it is written. You should try it some time. Read it in the Greek which it was originally written in and it is not ambiguous in the least. You pretend it is but it is not. It is very clear what it means. You are playing on the ambiguity in the English and make it out as if it says something it does not. That is your sorcery.
edit on 14-8-2011 by jmdewey60 because: (no reason given)
When I say someone is lying, I back it up by pointing out how it is false. You are just saying I am. That is not an argument. Why don't you explain what you learned from that web site you linked to. Posting a link is not an argument.
Your argument is false and another lie.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by XplanetX
When I say someone is lying, I back it up by pointing out how it is false. You are just saying I am. That is not an argument. Why don't you explain what you learned from that web site you linked to. Posting a link is not an argument.
Your argument is false and another lie.